Evaluation of tracheoesophageal substitute voices using prosodic features

Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Haderlein, Tino ^a   Nöth, Elmar ^a   Schuster, Maria ^a   Eysholdt, Ulrich ^a   Rosanowski, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PATIENT REHABILITATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION CRITERIA; PROSODIC FEATURES; SPEECH REHABILITATION; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL SPEECH; VOICE QUALITY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 38049133464     PISSN: 23332042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. M. I. Singer and E. D. Blom. An Endoscopic Technique for Restoration of the Voice after Laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 89: 529. 533, 1980.
2. J. Robbins, H. B. Fisher, E. D. Blom, and M. I. Singer. A Comparative Acoustic Study of Normal, Esophageal, and Tracheoesophageal Speech Production. J Speech Hear Disord, 49: 202. 210, 1984.
3. M. H. Bellandese, J. W. Lerman, and H. R. Gilbert. An Acoustic Analysis of Excellent Female Esophageal, Tracheoesophageal, and Laryngeal Speakers. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 44: 1315. 1320, 2001.
4. H. K. Schutte and G. J. Nieboer. Aerodynamics of esophageal voice production with and without a Groningen voice prosthesis. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 54: 8. 18, 2002.
5. J. Gandour and B. Weinberg. Perception of Intonational Contrasts in Alaryngeal Speech. J Speech Hear Res, 26: 142. 148, 1983.
6. J. P. Searl and M. A. Carpenter. Acoustic Cues to the Voicing Feature in Tracheoesophageal Speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45: 282. 294, 2002.
7. T. Haderlein, S. Steidl, E. Nöth, F. Rosanowski, and M. Schuster. Automatic Recognition and Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Speech. In P. Sojka, I. Kopecek, and K. Pala, editors, Proc. TSD 2004, volume 3206 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 331. 338, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
8. M. Schuster, E. Nöth, T. Haderlein, S. Steidl, A. Batliner, and F. Rosanowski. Can You Understand Him? Let's Look at His Word Accuracy. Automatic Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Speech. In Proc. ICASSP, volume I, pages 61. 64, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
9. A. Batliner, J. Buckow, H. Niemann, E. Nöth, and V. Warnke. The Prosody Module. In W. Wahlster, editor, Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation, pages 106. 121. Springer, Berlin, 2000.
10. R. Likert. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives in Psychology, 140: 1. 55, 1932.
11. J. Lohscheller. Dynamics of the Laryngectomee Substitute Voice Production. Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, Germany, 2003. PhD thesis.
12. G. Stemmer. Modeling Variability in Speech Recognition, volume 19 of Studien zur Mustererkennung. Logos Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
13. A. Batliner, J. Buckow, R. Huber, V. Warnke, E. Nöth, and H. Niemann. Prosodic Feature Evaluation: Brute Force or Well Designed? In Proc. 14th ICPhS, volume 3, pages 2315. 2318, San Francisco, 1999.
14. A. Batliner, K. Fischer, R. Huber, J. Spilker, and E. Nöth. How to Find Trouble in Communication. Speech Communication, 40: 117. 143, 2003.
15. A. Kießling. Extraktion und Klassikation prosodischer Merkmale in der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung. Berichte aus der Informatik. Shaker, Aachen, 1997.