A polymorphic dynamic network loading model

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 86-103

  Ma, Jingtao ^b   Zhang, H Michael ^b  

^a Marco), Nie   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; POLYMORPHISM; ROADS AND STREETS;

MACROSCOPIC LINK/NODE MODELS; MACROSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION; POLYMORPHIC DYNAMIC NETWORK LOADING;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; POLYMORPHISM; ROADS AND STREETS; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

MODELING; PARALLEL COMPUTING; POLYMORPHISM; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 38049129377     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00525.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Astarita, V. (1996), A continuous time link model for dynamic network loading based on travel time function, in The Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France, 79-102.
2. Barcelo, J. (1998), Parallelization of microscopic traffic simulation for ATT systems analysis, in P. Marcotte and S. Nguyen (eds.), Equilibrium and Advanced Transportation Modelling, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Koutsopoulos, H. & Mishalani, R. (1998), Dynamit: A simulation-based system for traffic prediction, presented at the DAC-CORD short-term forecasting workshop, Delft, The Netherlands.
4. Burghout, W., Koutsopoulos, H. N. & Andreasson, I. (2005), Hybrid mesoscopic-microscopic traffic simulation, Transportation Research Record, 1934, 218-225.
5. Bush, B. W. (2000), An Algorithmic Overview of TRANSIMS, Los Alamos National Laboratories.
6. Carey, M. & Ge, Y. E. (2005), Convergence of a discretised travel-time model, Transportation Science, 39, 25-38.
7. Carey, M. & McCartney, M. (2002), Behaviour of a whole-link travel time model used in dynamic traffic assignment, Transportation Research, 36B, 83-95.
8. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K. & Lewy, H. (1928), ber die partiellen differenzengleichungen der-mathematischen physik, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 32-74.
9. Daganzo, C. F. (1994), The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory, Transportation Research, 28B, 269-287.
10. Daganzo, C. F. (1995a), The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic, Transportation Research, 29B, 79-93.
11. Daganzo, C. F. (1995b), Properties of link travel times under dynamic load, Transportation Research, 29B, 95-98.
12. Daganzo, C. F. (2005a), A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Basic theory and complex boundary conditions, Transportation Research, 39B, 187-96.
13. Daganzo, C. F. (2005b), A variational formulation of kinematic waves: Solution methods, Transportation Research, 39B, 934-50.
14. Fellendorf, M. (1994), VISSIM: A microscopic simulation tool to evaluate actuated signal control including bus priority, presented at the 64th ITE Annual Meeting, Session 32, Dallas.
15. Friesz, T. L., Bernstein, D., Smith, T. E., Tobin, R. L. & Wei, B. W. (1993), A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network equilibrium problem, Operation Research, 41, 179-91.
16. FWHA, (1996), CORSIM User Guide. Technical Report Version 1.0, Federal Highway Administration, US-DOT, McLean, Virginia.
17. Godunov, S. K. (1959), A difference method for numerical calculations of discontinuous solutions of the equations of hydrodynamics, Matematicheskii Sbornik, in Russian, 47, 271-306.
18. Jin, W.-L. (2003), Kinematic wave traffic flow models for road networks: Theories, simulations, and applications, PhD thesis, The University of California, Davis, CA.
19. Jin, W.-L. & Zhang, H. M. (2001), On the distribution schemes in the discrete kinematic wave model of merges, Transportation Research, 37B, 521-40.
20. Jin, W.-L. & Zhang, H. M. (2004), A multicommodity kinematic wave simulation model of network traffic flow, Transportation Research Record 1883, 59-67.
21. Lebacque, J. P. (1996), The Godunov scheme and what it means for firrst order traffic flow models, in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France, 647-677.
22. Lebacque, J. P. & Khoshyaran, M. M. (2005), First order macroscopic traffic flow models: Intersections modeling, network modeling, in H. S. Mahmassani (ed.), Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium of Transportation and Traffic Theory, College Park, MD, pp. 365-86.
23. Lighthill, M. J. & Whitham, J. B. (1955), On kinematic waves. I. flow modeling in long rivers. II. a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 229, 291-345.
24. Luke, J. (1972), Mathematical models for landform evolution, Journal of Geophysical Research, 77, 2460-4.
25. Mahmassani, H. S. (2000), DYNASMART-P, volume II, user guide, Technical Report STO67-85-PII, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin.
26. Mahut, M., Florian, M. & Tremblay, N. (2003), Space-time queues and dynamic traffic assignment: A model, algorithm and applications, presented at the 82th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
27. Merchant, D. K. & Nemhauser, G. L. (1978a), A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem, Transportation Science, 12, 183-99.
28. Merchant, D. K. & Nemhauser, G. L. (1978b), Optimality conditions for a dynamic traffic assignment model, Transportation Science, 12, 200-7.
29. Michalopoulos, P., Beskos, D. & Lin, J. (1984), Analysis of interrupted traffic flow by finite difference methods, Transportation Research, 18B, 409-21.
30. Michalopoulos, P. & Plum, R. (1986), KRONOS-4: Final Report and Users Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
31. Newell, G. F. (1993), A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, Transportation Research, 27B, 281-314.
32. Nie, Y. (2006), A Variational Inequality Approach For Inferring Dynamic Origin-Destination Travel Demands, PhD thesis, The University of California, Davis, CA, http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/nie/ nie-diss.pdf.
33. Nie, Y. & Zhang, H. M. (2007), Solving the dynamic user optimal assignment problem considering queue spillback, Networks and Spatial Economics, available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/ w6653261h1uOr57/.
34. Palma, A. D. & Marchal, F. (1998), Analysis of traffic cost components using large-scale, dynamic traffic models, Transportation Research Record, 1676, 177-83.
35. Papageorgiou, M. (1990), Dynamic modeling, assignment, and route guidance in traffic net-works, Transportation Research, 24B, 471-95.
36. Payne, H. J. (1979), FREFLO: A macroscopic simulation model of freeway traffic, Transporta-tion Research Record, 722, 68-77.
37. Quadstone (2002), Paramics user guide and references, Technical report.
38. Richards, P. I. (1956), Shockwaves on the highway, Operation Research, 4, 42-51.
39. Taylor, N. B. (1990), CONTRAM 5: An enhanced trac assignment model, Report RR249, Transport and Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK.
40. Van-Aerde, M. & Yagar, S. (1988), Dynamic integrated freeway/traffic signal networks: A routing-based modelling approach, Transportation Research, 22A, 445-53.
41. Velan, S. M. (2000), The cell-transmission model: A new look at a dynamic network loading model, PhD thesis, Center for research on transportation, University of Montreal, Canada.
42. Xu, Y. W., Wu, J. H., Florian, M., Marcotte, P. & Zhu, D. L. (1999), Advances in the continuous dynamic network loading problem, Transportation Science, 33, 341-53.
43. Yang, Q. & Koutsopoulos, H. N. (1996), A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems, Transportation Research, 4C(3), 113-29.
44. Yang, Q. & Morgan, D. (2006), A hybrid traffic simulation model, presented at 85th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
45. Zhang, H. M. & Nie, Y. (2006), Modeling network flow with and without link interaction: Properties and implications, presented at the 84th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.