Comparison of full-text searching to metadata searching for genes in two biomedical literature cohorts

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 2341-2352

  Hemminger, Bradley M ^a   Saelim, Billy ^a   Sullivan, Patrick F ^b   Vision, Todd J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE DOMAINS; FULL-TEXT SEARCHES;

GENES; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

METADATA;

EID: 38049110868     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20708     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Beall, J. (2006). The death of full-text searching. PNLA Quarterly, 70(2), Winter, 1984-1998.
2. Blair, D.C., & Marion, M.E. (1985). An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Communication of the Association for Computing Machinery, 28(3), 289-299.
3. Brin, S., & Page. L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. WWW7/Computer Networks Conference, April 1998, 107-117, Brisbane, Australia.
4. Chiang, J.H., & Yu, H.C (2003). MeKE: Discovering the functions of gene products from biomedical literature via sentence alignment. Bioinformatics, 19(11), 1417-1422.
5. de Bruijn, B., & Martin, J. (2002). Getting to the (c)ore of knowledge: Mining biomedical literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 67(1-3), 7-18.
6. Donaldson, I., Martin, J., de Bruijn, B., Wolting, C. Lay, V., Tuekam, B., et al. (2003, March 27). PreBIND and Textomy-Mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 11.
7. Hawking, D., & Zobel, J. (2007). Does topic metadata help with Web search? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 613-628.
8. Hemminger, B.M. (2005, November). Information seeking behavior of scientists. Panel presentation at the American Society of Information Science and Technology Conference, Charlotte, NC.
9. Hemminger, B.M. (2007). Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (in press).
10. Hersh. W.R., Bhupatiraju, R.T., Ross, L., Roberts. P., Cohen, A.M., & Karemer, D.R (2006). Enhancing access to the Bibliome: The TREC 2004 Genomics Track. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 1(3), DOI: 10.1186/1747-5333-1-3.
11. Hirschman, L., Park, J.C., Tsujii, J., Wong, L., & Wu, C.H. (2002). Accomplishments and challenges in literature data mining for biology. Bioint'ormatics, 18(12), 1553-1561.
12. HUGO. (2006). [database]. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www. genenames.org/index.html.
13. Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., Bateman, J., & Saracevic, T. (1998). Real life information retrieval: A study of user queries on the Web. ACM SIGIR Forum. 32(1), 5-17.
14. Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33. 159-174.
15. Lucene. (2007). Lucene full-text search engine application. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/
16. McKinin, E.J., Sievert, M., Johnson, E.D., & Mitchell, J.A. (1991). The Medline/Full-Text Research Project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 297-307.
17. MeSH. (2007). National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
18. Müller, H.M., Kenny, E.E., & Sternberg, P.W. (2004). Textpresso: An ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature. PLoS Biology, 2(11).
19. MySQL. (2006a). MySQL Database System. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://dev.mysql.com
20. MySQL. (2006b). MySQL full-text search functions. Retrieved October 10. 2006, from http://dev.mysql.eom/doc/refman/5.0/en/fulltext-search. html
21. MySQL. (2006c). MySQL stopword list. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://dev.mysql.eom/doc/refman/5.0/en/fulltext-stopwords.html
22. NeoRef. (2006), NeoRef demonstration article review system. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://neoref.ils.unc.edu/review/
23. NLM. (2006). Efetch routine. Retrieved July 8. 2006, from http://eutils. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/static/efetch_help.html
24. Online Computer Library Center, (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources (2005). PEW Survey for Online Computer Library Center. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.odc.org/reports/ 2005perceptions.htm
25. PDFbox. (2006). PDFbox application interface. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.pdfbox.org/
26. Pitkin, R.M, Branagan, M.A., & Burmeister, L.F. (1999). Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(12), 1110-1111.
27. PubMed. (2006). National Library of Medicine PubMed Database. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query. fcgi?DB=pubmed
28. Ries, J.E., Su, K., Peterson, G., Sievert, M.E.C., Patrick, T.B., Moxley, D.E., & Ries, L.D. (2001). Comparing frequency of content-bearing words in abstracts and texts in articles from four medical journals: An exploratory study. Medinfo, 10(Pt. 1), 381-384.
29. Salton, G. (1968). Automatic information organization and retrieval. McGraw-Hill.
30. Salton, G. (1970). Automatic text analysis. Science, 168(3929), 335-343.
31. Shatkay, H., & Feldman, R. (2003), Mining the biomedical literature in the Genomic Era: An overview. Journal of Computational Biology, 10(6). 821-855.
32. Spark, K.J., & van Rijsbergen, C. (1975). Report on the need for and provision of an "ideal" information retrieval test collection (British Library Research and Development Report No. 5266). University of Cambridge, England, Computer Laboratory.
33. Sullivan. (2006). Pat Sullivan Research Laboratory. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.med.unc.edu/-pfsulliv/welcome.htm
34. Swanson, D.R. (1960). Searching natural language text by computer. Science, 132(3434), 1099-1104.
35. Swanson, D.R. (1987). Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38, 228-233.
36. Swanson, D.R. (1990). Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 78(1), 29-37.
37. TAIR. (2006). TAIR Database Resource. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.arabidopsis.org/
38. Tanabe, L., Scherf, U., Smith L.H., Lee, J.K., Hunter, L., & Weinstein, J.N. (1999). MedMiner: An Internet text-mining tool for biomedical information, with application to gene expression profiling, BioTechniques, 27, 1210-1217.
39. Tenopir, C. (1984). Retrieval performance in a full-text journal article database. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois School of Library and Information Science, Champaign-Urbana.
40. Vision. (2006). Todd Vision Research Laboratory. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://visionlab.bio.unc.edu/
41. Voorhees, E., & Harman, D. (2000). Overview of the 9th Text Retrieval Conference.
42. Weinberg, B.H. (1981). Word frequency and automatic indexing (dissertation). New York: Columbia University, School of Library Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1983.
43. Yeh, A.S., Hirschman, L., & Morgan, A.A. (2003). Evaluation of text data mining for database curation: Lessons learned from the KDD Challenge Cup Bioinformatics, 19(Suppl, 1), i331-i339.