Volume-targeted ventilation in the neonate: Time to change?

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Grover, A ^a   Field, D ^b  

^a LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LUNG SURFACTANT;

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BREATHING MECHANICS; CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LUNG DYSPLASIA; LUNG VENTILATION; LUNG VOLUME; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; SHORT SURVEY;

HUMANS; INFANT CARE; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 38049110259     PISSN: 13592998     EISSN: 14682052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.113464     Document Type: Short Survey

References (27)

1. Fitzgerald DA, Mesiano G, Brosseau L, et al. Pulmonary outcome in extremely low birth infants. Pediatrics 2000;105:1209- 15.
2. Jobe A. The new BPD: an arrest of lung development. Pediatr Pes 1999;46:641-6.
3. Hernandez LA, Peevy KJ, Moise AA, et al. Chest wall restriction limits high airway pressure-induced lung injury in young rabbits. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:2364-8
4. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:294-323.
5. Bjorklund LJ, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, et al. Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatr Res 1997;42:348-55.
6. Anonymous. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8.
7. Luyt K, Wright D, Baumer JH. Randomised study comparing extent of hypocarbia in preterm infants during conventional and patient triggered ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;84:F14-7.
8. Fujimoto S, Togari H, Yamaguchi N, et al. Hypocarbia and cystic periventricular leucomalacia in premature infants. Arch Dis Child 1994;71:107-10.
9. Donn SM, Sinha SK. Newer modes of mechanical ventilation for the neonate. Curr Opin Pediatr 2001;13:99-103.
10. Keszler M. Voulme-targeted ventilation. Early Hum Dev 2006;82:811-8.
11. McCallion N, Lau R, Morley CJ, et al. Neonatal volume guarantee ventilation: effects of spontaneous breathing, triggered and untriggered inflations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:36-9.
12. Sinha SK, Donn SM, Gavey J, et al. Randomised trial of volume controlled versus time cycled, pressure limited ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;77:F202-5.
13. Singh J, Sinha SK, Clarke P, et al. Mechanical ventilation of very low birth infants: is voulme or pressure a better variable? J Pediatr 2006;149:308-13.
14. Singh J, Alsop E, Sinha SK, et al. Volume control versus pressure limited ventilation in very low birth weight infants: long term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. E-PAS 2007;616090.2.
15. Cheema IU, Ahluwalia JS. Feasibility of tidal volume-guided ventilation in newborn infants: a randomized, crossover trial using the volume guarantee modality. Pediatrics 2001;107:1323-8.
16. Herrera CM, Gerhardt T, Claure N, et al. Effects of volume-guaranteed synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants recovering from respiratory failure. Pediatrics 2002;110:529-33.
17. Abubakar KM, Keszler M. Patient-ventilator interactions in new modes of patient-triggered ventilation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001;32:71-5.
18. Keszler M, Abubakar KM. Stability of tidal volume and incidence of hypocarbia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2004;38:240-5.
19. Abubakar KM, Keszler M. Effect of volume guarantee combined with assist/control vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. J Perinatol 2005;25:638-42.
20. Nafday SM, Green RS, Lin J, et al. Is there an advantage of using pressure support ventilation with volume guarantee in the initial management of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome? A pilot study. J Perinatol 2005;25:193-7.
21. Olsen SL, Thibeault DW, Truog W. Crossover trial comparing pressure suppport with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. J Perinatol 2002;22:461-6.
22. Lista G, Colnaghi M, Castoldi F, et al. Impact of targeted-volume ventilation on lung inflammatory response in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Pediatr Pulmonol 2004;37:510-4.
23. Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al. Lung inflammation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: effects of ventilation with different tidal volumes. Pediatr Pulmonol 2006;41:357-63.
24. Cheema IU, Sinha AK, Kempley ST, et al. Impact of volume guarantee ventilation on arterial carbon dioxide tension in newborn infants: a randomised control trial. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:183-9.
25. Piotrowski A, Sobala W, Kawczyn'ski P. Patient-initiated, pressure-regulated, volume-controlled ventilation compared with intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates: a prospective, randomised study. Intensive Care Med 1997;23:975-81.
26. D'Angio CT, Chess PR, Kovacs SJ, et al. Pressure-regulated volume control ventilation vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for very low-birth-weight infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:868-75.
27. McCallion N, Davis P, Morley C. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(3):CD003666.