Immune response to xenogeneic matrix grafts used in pediatric surgery

European Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 420-425

  Meyer, Th ^a,b   Meyer, B ^b   Schwarz, K ^c   Hocht B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lyoplant ; TH2 pathway; Xenogeneic extracellular matrix

Indexed keywords

CD68 ANTIGEN; POLYPROPYLENE;

ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECT; ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; BODY WEIGHT; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL INFILTRATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GROWTH RATE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; MALE; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); NONHUMAN; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; RAT; XENOGRAFT;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD; ANTIGENS, CD4; ANTIGENS, CD8; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION, MYELOMONOCYTIC; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHILD; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GRAFT REJECTION; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, CELLULAR; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; POLYPROPYLENES; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; T-LYMPHOCYTES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38049110131     PISSN: 09397248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Abbas AK, Murphy KM, Sher A. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 1996; 383: 787
2. Adedeji OA, Bailey CA, Varma S. Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal wall reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55: 85-86
3. Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Badylak SF, Kullakury B, Sheehan et al. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response. Transplantation 2001; 71: 1631-1640
4. Bach FH, Ferran C, Hechenleitner P et al. Accommodation of vascularized xenografts: expression of "protective genes" by donor epithelial cells in a host Th2 cytokine environment. Nature Med 1997; 3: 196
5. Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B et al. Morphologic study of small intestine submucosa as a body wall repair device. J Surg Res 2002; 103: 190-202
6. Bellon JM, Contreras LA, Pascual G, Bujan J. Neoperitoneal formation after implantation of various biomaterials for the repair of abdominal wall defects in rabbits. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 145-150
7. Chen N, Filed EH. Enhanced type 2 and diminished type 1 cytokines in neonatal tolerance. Transplantation 1995; 59: 933
8. Chen N, Gao Q, Field EH. Prevention of Th1 responses is critical for tolerance. Transplantation 1996; 61: 1076
9. Clarke KM, Lantz GC, Salisburry SK et al. Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res 1996; 60: 107-114
10. Disa JJ, Klein MH, Goldberg NH. Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 801-806
11. Hengirmen S, Cete M, Soran A, Aksoy F, Sencer H, Okay E. Comparison of meshes for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects. J Invest Surg 1998; 11: 315-325
12. Jenkins SD, Klamer TW, Parteka JJ, Condon RE. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery 1983; 94: 392-398
13. Matsumiya G, Shirakura R, Miyagawa S, Izutani H, Nakata S, Matsuda H. Assessment of T-cell subsets involved in antibody production and cell-mediated cytotoxicity in rat-to-mouse cardiac xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 1994; 26: 1214
14. Meyer T, Höcht B. Defektdeckung mittels Integra™ im Kindesalter. Chir Praxis 2001; 58: 685-690
15. Meyer T, Schwarz K, Ulrichs K, Höcht B. A new biocompatible material (Lyoplant®) for the therapy of congenital abdominal wall defects: first experimental results in rats. Ped Surg Int 2006; 22: 369-374
16. Piccotti JR, Chan SY, VanBuskirk AM, Eichwald EJ, Bishop DK. Are Th2 helper T lymphocytes beneficial, deleterious, or irrelevant in promoting allograft survival? Transplantation 1997; 63: 619
17. Roeder R, Wolfe J, Lianakis N, Hinson T, Geddes LA, Obermiller J. Compliance, elastic modulus, and burst pressure of small-intestine submucosa (SIS), small-diameter vascular grafts. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 47: 65
18. Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Bercowsky E et al. Laparoscopic replacement of urinary tract segments using biodegradable materials in a large animal model. J Endourol 1999; 13: 241
19. Smith S, Gantt N, Rowe MI, Lloyd DA. Dura versus Gore-Tex as an abdominal wall prosthesis in an open and closed infected model. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24: 519-521
20. Soiderer EE, Lantz GC, Kazacos EA, Hodde JP, Wiegand RE. Morphologic study of three collagen materials for body wall repair. J Surg Res 2004; 118: 161-175
21. Strom TB, Roy-Chaudhury P, Manfro R. The Th1/Th2 paradigm and the allograft response. Curr Opin Immunol 1996; 8: 688
22. Szabo A, Haj M, Waxsman I, Eitan A. Evaluation of seprafilm and amniotic membrane as adhesion prophylaxis in mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia in rats. Eur J Surg Res 2000; 32: 125-128
23. Wunsch L, Ehlers EM, Russlies M. Matrix testing for urothelial tissue engineering. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 164-169
24. Zhai Y, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW, Kupiec-Weglinski JW. Th1 and Th2 cytokines in organ transplantation: paradigm lost? Crit Rev Immunol 1999; 19: 155