Self-consistent theory of reversible ligand binding to a spherical cell

Physical Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 344-354

  Ghosh, Shivam ^a,b,d   Gopalakrishnan, Manoj ^a   Forsten Williams, Kimberly ^c  

^a HARISH CHANDRA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^c State University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; DISSOCIATION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 38049103229     PISSN: 14783967     EISSN: 14783975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/4/4/010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lauffenburger D A and Linderman J L 1996 Receptors: Models of Binding, Trafficking and Ssignaling (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p 133
2. Berg H C and Purcell E M 1977 Physics of chemoreception Biophys. J. 20 193-219
3. DeLisi C and Wiegel F W 1981 Effect of nonspecific forces and finite receptor number on rate constants of ligand-cell bound-receptor interactions Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78 5569-72
4. Shoup D and Szabo A 1982 Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors Biophys. J. 40 33-9
5. Zwanzig R 1990 Diffusion-controlled ligand binding to spheres partially covered by receptors: an effective medium treatment Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87 5856-7
6. Erickson J, Goldstein B, Holowka D and Baird B 1987 The effect of receptor density on the forward rate constant for binding of ligands to cell surface receptors Biophys. J. 52 657-62
7. Wiley H S 1988 Anomalous binding of epidermal growth factor to A431 cells is due to the effect of high receptor densities and a saturable endocytic system J. Cell. Biol. 107 801-10
8. Guerts B J and Wiegel F W 1987 Time-dependent ligand current into a single cell performing chemoreception Biophys. Chem. 28 7-12
9. Zwanzig R and Szabo A 1991 Time dependent rate of diffusion-influenced ligand binding to receptors on cell surfaces Biophys. J. 60 671-8
10. Goldstein B and Dembo M 1995 Approximating the effects of diffusion on reversible reactions at the cell surface: ligand-receptor kinetics Biophys. J. 68 1222-30
11. Lagerholm B C and Thompson N L 1998 Theory for ligand binding at cell membrane surfaces Biophys. J. 74 1215-28
12. Gopalakrishnan M, Forsten-Williams K, Nugent M A and Täuber U C 2005 Effects of receptor clustering on ligand dissociation: theory and simulations Biophys. J. 89 3686-700
13. Gopalakrishnan M, Forsten-Williams K, Cassino T R, Pedro L, Ryan T E and Täuber U C 2005 Ligand rebinding: self-consistent mean-field theory and numerical simulations applied to surface plasmon resonance studies Eur. Biophys. J. 34 943-58
14. Abramowitz M and Stegun I A 1970 Handbook of Mathematical Functions (New York: Dover)
15. Zeldovich Ya B and Ovchinnikov A A 1977 JETP Lett. 26 440
16. Rey P-A and Cardy J 1999 Asymptotic form of the approach to equilibrium in reversible recombination reactions J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 1585-603
17. Gopich I V and Agmon N 2000 Rigorous derivation of the long-time asymptotics of reversible binding Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2730-3
18. Hendriks et al 2003 Quantitative analysis of HER2-mediated effects on HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis J. Biol. Chem. 278 23343-51
19. Tkachenko E and Simons M 2002 Clustering induces redistribution of syndecan-4 core proteins into raft membrane domains J. Biol. Chem. 277 19946-51
20. Sourjik V 2004 Receptor clustering and signal processing in bacterial chemotaxis Trends Microbiol. 12 569-76
21. Bialek W and Setayeshgar S 2005 Physical limits to biochemical signaling Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 10040-5
22. Carslaw H S and Jaegar J C 1959 Conduction of Heat in Solids 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
23. Berg O G 1978 On diffusion-controlled dissociation Chem. Phys. 31 47-57