Atmospheric emissions modeling of energetic biomass alternatives using system dynamics approach

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 403-414

  Szarka, Nora ^a,b   Kakucs, Orsolya ^a   Wolfbauer, Jürgen ^a   Bezama, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEOBEN   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

Author keywords

Atmospheric emissions; Energetic biomass; Regional modeling; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAS EMISSIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS; ENERGETIC BIOMASS; REGIONAL MODELING; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

BIOMASS;

BIOFUEL; CARBON DIOXIDE;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; BIOMASS; EMISSION; MODELING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CROP PRODUCTION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY CONVERSION; ENERGY CROP; EXHAUST GAS; HEATING; HUNGARY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRAFFIC;

AUSTRIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; HUNGARY;

EID: 38049080576     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.051     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Afgan N.H., Al Gobaisi D., Carvalho M.G., and Cumo M. Sustainable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2 3 (1998) 235-286
2. Anderl, M., Poupa, S., Ritter, M., 2004. Bundesländer Luftschadstoff-Inventur 1990 bis 2002 (Air pollutants inventory in the federal states). Report No. Be-250, Austrian Federal Ministry of Environment, Vienna, Austria, pp. 15-61.
3. BABBI (Burgenland Agrar Beratungs-u. Betreuungsinitiative), 2004. Energie Umwelt Wertschöpfung Zukunftschance Biomasse. Eisenstadt, p. 2. 〈http://www.burgenland.at/media/file/146_biomasse_broschuere_2004.pdf〉.
4. Bai, A., Lakner, Z., Marosvölgyi, B., Nábrádi, A., 2002. A Biomassza Felhasználása (The Utilization of Biomass). Ed. Szaktudás Kiadó Ház Rt, Budapest, Hungary.
5. Barótfi I. A Biomassza Energetikai Hasznosítása-Energiagazdálkodási Kézikönyv 9 (Energetic Utilization of Biomass-Energy Management Handbook 9) (1998), Hungarian Ministry of Economy, Budapest, Hungary
6. Berka V., and Dobrosi L. High level handling of system dynamics models in rural development planning. In: Wolfbauer J., and Kürzl H. (Eds). Proceedings of Iron Curtain International Symposium (2004), Geonardo Ltd., Budapest, Hungary 82
7. BFW (Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape), 2002. Austrian Forest Inventory 2000/02. Department of Forest Inventory, Vienna. 〈http://web.bfw.ac.at/700/790.html〉.
8. BTH (Statistical Department of the Province Council Bureau of Burgenland/Eisenstadt, Hungarian Central Statistical Office, County Council Bureau of Gyo{combining double acute accent}r-Moson-Sopron, County Council Bureau of Vas, County Council Bureau of Zala), 2003. The EuRegion in Numbers 2001, p. 44. 〈http://www.euregio.hu/eu/kiadvanyok/〉.
9. EC (European Commission), 1997. Energy for the future: renewable sources of energy. White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan. Communication from the Commission. COM(97)599 final (26/11/1997), Brussels, Belgium.
10. EC (European Commission), 2003. Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on promotion the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. Official Journal of the European Union L123/42, Brussels, Belgium.
11. EC (European Commission), 2005a. The European Sustainable Development Strategy 2005-2010, Brussels, Belgium.
12. EC (European Commission), 2005b. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Thematic Strategy on air pollution {SEC(2005) 1132}. COM(2005) 446 fin, Brussels, Belgium.
13. EC (European Commission), 2007. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, limiting global climate change to 2 degrees celsius. The Way Ahead for 2020 and Beyond. {SEC(2007) 7}, {SEC(2007) 8}, Brussels, Belgium.
14. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2003. Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook, third ed. Co-operative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long Range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe, Brussels. 〈http://reports.eea.eu.int/EMEPCORINAIR4/en/AEIG_Section_A.pdf〉.
15. EREC (European Renewable Energy Council), 2004. Renewable Energy Policy Review Austria, p. 9. 〈http://www.erec-renewables.org/〉.
16. EuRégió, 2003a. Jövo{combining double acute accent}kép és Fejlesztési Stratégia, I. Kötet (Vision and Development Strategy, I. Volume), p. 10. 〈http://www.euregio.hujovokep1.zip〉.
17. EuRégió, 2003b. Jövo{combining double acute accent}kép és Fejlesztési Stratégia, II. Kötet: a tervezés során elkészült munkaanyagok teljes terjedelemben (Vision and Development Strategy, II. Volume: Work Materials Made in the Planning Phase in Full Extent), p. 27. 〈http://www.euregio.hujovokep2.zip〉.
18. Eurostat (Statistical Office of the Environment and Energy), 2006. EUROPA-Eurostat-Homepage, Brussels, Belgium. 〈http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int〉.
19. FEA (Federal Environment Agency), 2004. Biofuels in the transport sector in Austria in 2004, summary of information from the Republic of Austria in accordance with Article 4(1) of Directive 2003/30/EC for the reporting year 2003, Vienna, Austria.
20. Forrester, J.W., 1989. The beginning of system dynamics. In: Milling, P.M., Zahn, E.O.K. (Eds.), Computer Based Management of Complex Systems: Proceedings of the 1989 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
21. Giber, J., Gönczi, P., Somosi, L., Szerdahelyi, Gy., Tombor, A., Varga, T., Braun, A., Dobos, G., 2005. Az új magyar energiapolitika tézisei a 2006-2030 évek közötti ido{combining double acute accent}szakra, 12. fejezet: a megújuló energiaforrások szerepe az energiaellátásban (Theses of the New Hungarian Energy Policy for the Period 2006-2030, Chapter 12: The Role of RES in the Energy Supply), Hungarian Ministry of Economy and Transport, Budapest, p. II.
22. IEA (International Energy Agency, Energy Statistics), 2006. IEA Energy Statistics Homepage, Paris, France. 〈http://www.iea.org/Textbase/stats/index.asp〉.
23. Kaltschmitt, M., Hartmann, H., 2001. Energie aus Biomasse (Energy from Biomass), ed. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany.
24. KSH (Központi Statisztikai Hivatal, Hungarian Central Statistical Office), 2006, Budapest, Hungary. 〈http://portal.ksh.hu〉.
25. KvVM (Ministry of Environmental Protection and Water Management), 2002. Adatok Hazánk Környezeti Állapotáról (Data on the Environmental State of Hungary), Budapest, Hungary.
26. KvVM (Ministry of Environmental Protection and Water Management), 2004. National greenhouse gas inventories 2001 Hungary. Submission under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 〈http://www.kvvm.hu/szakmai/klima/〉.
27. Li X. Diversification and localization of energy systems for sustainable development and energy security. Energy Policy 33 17 (2005) 2237-2243
28. Miller I., Knopf S., and Kossik R. Linking general-purpose dynamic simulation models with GIS. In: Maguire J.D., et al. (Ed). GIS, Spatial Analysis and Modeling (2005), ESRI Press, California 126
29. MTESZ (County Organization of Gyo{combining double acute accent}r-Moson-Sopron), 1999. Gyo{combining double acute accent}r-Moson-Sopron megye energetikai programja, Gyo{combining double acute accent}r (Energy Program of County Gyo{combining double acute accent}r-Moson-Sopron, Gyo{combining double acute accent}r), Gyo{combining double acute accent}r, Hungary, pp. 38-65.
30. Neubarth, J., Kaltschmitt, M., 2000. Erneuerbare Energien in Österreich (Renewable Energy in Austria), Springer, Vienna, Austria.
31. Ökohydro Kft., 2002. Nyugat-dunántúli Regionális Környezetgazdálkodási Program, Helyzetfeltárás I. Kötet (Environmental Management Program of West-Transdanubia, Current State I. Volume), Szombathely, Hungary, p. 3.
32. Palkovits, I., Pogátsa, Z., Kohlheb, N., Ádám, K., Erdo{combining double acute accent}s, K., 2003. Economic development strategy of the West-Pannonia Euregion 2004-2006, Phare CBC Hungary-Austria Programme, HU 001503-28/1. Project, pp. 23-25. 〈http://www.westpa.hu/cgi-bin/rhti/dokutar/dokulist_guest.cgi?mode=1&parentid=30&nyelv=en〉.
33. Republic of Hungary (Permanent Representation of the Republic of Hungary to the EU), 2004. Report of the Republic of Hungary to the Commission on the promotion of the use of biofuels for transport. First Report. 〈http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/doc/biofuels/member_states/2003_30_hu_report_en.pdf〉.
34. Sims R.E.H. Bioenergy Options for a Cleaner Environment In Developed and Developing Countries (2004), Elsevier pp. 1-50
35. Statistic Austria, 2006. Statistics Austria-The Information Manager, Vienna, Austria. 〈http://www.statistik.at〉.
36. Streimikiene D., Ciegis R., and Grundey D. Energy indicators for sustainable development in Baltic States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 5 (2007) 877-893
37. Streimikiene D., Klevas V., and Bubeliene J. Use of EU structural funds for sustainable energy development in new EU member states. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 6 (2007) 1167-1187
38. Szarka, N., 2006. Forest and agriculture-origin biomass potential of Borsod county. Presentation of the I. Eco-energetic and IX. Biomass conference, Sopron, Hungary.
39. Szarka, N., Wolfbauer, J., Kakucs, O., Bezama, A., 2006. Selection of appropriate processes for a sustainable regional energy use from agricultural and forest biomass with system dynamics modelling. In: International Waste Working Group (Eds.), Proceedings of first the Biomass and Waste to Energy Symposium, Venice 2006, Venice, Italy.
40. Taylor, P.G., Wiesenthal, T., Mourelatou, A., 2005. Energy and environment in the European Union: an indicator-based analysis. Natural Resources Forum, November 2005, vol. 29(4), pp. 360-380.
41. Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environmental Agency), 2004. Environmental situation in Austria. Seventh State of the Environment Report of the Federal Minister of Environment to the National Assembly of the Austrian Parliament, Vienna, pp. 266-279. 〈http://www.umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/umweltkontrolle/2004/E0402_luft.pdf〉.
42. Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environmental Agency), 2005. ProBas-Prozessorientierte Basisdaten für Umweltmanagement-Instrumente (ProBas-Process-oriented database for environmental management instruments), Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany. 〈http://www.probas.umweltbundesamt.de〉.
43. United Nations, 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
44. ® Standard Professional DSS Tutorial, 60 Jacob Gates Road, Harvard, USA.
45. Vera I., and Langlois L. Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy 32 6 (2007) 875-882
46. Vester, F., Hesler, A.V., 1980. Sensitivitätsmodell, Regionale Planungs-Gemeinschaft Untermain (Sensitivity Model, Regional Planning Society Untermain). 〈http://sysdyn.clexchange.org/sd-intro/home.html〉.
47. Weidou N., and Johansson T.B. Energy for sustainable development in China. Energy Policy 32 10 (2004) 1225-1229
48. Wolfbauer, 2005. Integrated decision support in spatial planning for sustainable rural development in areas along the former Iron Curtain. In: Proceedings of Iron Curtain International Symposium, Geonardo Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
49. Yue C., Liu C., and Liou E. A transition toward a sustainable energy future: feasibility assessment and development strategies of wind power in Taiwan. Energy Policy 29 12 (2001) 951-963