An adaptive semantic framework to support multiple user viewpoints over multiple databases

Studies in Computational Intelligence

Volumn 93, Issue , 2008, Pages 261-284

  Poslad, Stefan ^a   Zuo, Landong ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049078813     PISSN: 1860949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76361_13     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pellet, an open-source Java based OWL DL reasoner, Home page, retrieved from http://www.mindswap.org/2003/pellet/index.shtml on 2006-01.
2. Adnani, M.E., Ygtongnon, K. and Benslimane, D., A multiple layered functional data model to support multiple representations and interoperability of GIS: Application to urban management systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA), 2001, 70-75.
3. Baader, F. and Nutt, W., Basic Description Logics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
4. Baldwin, D., Applying multiple views to information systems: A Preliminary framework. ACM SIGMIS Database, 24 (4), 15-30.
5. Bechhofer, S., The DIG description logic interface: DIG/1.0, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, http://dl-web.man.ac.uk/dig/2002/10/ interface.pdf on 2006-01.
6. Bechhofer, S., Harmelen, F.v., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A. and Olin, F.W., OWL Web ontology language reference, W3C recommendation, 10 February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#Sublanguages on 2006-01.
7. Benchikha, F. and Boufaida, M., Roles, views and viewpoints in object-oriented databases. Workshop at European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2005), Glasgow, UK, 2005.
8. Bertino, E., Catania, B. and Zarri, G.P., Intelligent Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2001, 170-178.
9. Bouquet, P., Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J., Franconi, E., Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Serafini, L., Stamou, G., Sure, Y. and Tessaris, S., Knowledge Web project deliverable version 2.2.1, speci.cation of a common framework for characterizing alignment, Home page, retrieved from http://knowledgeweb.semanticweb.org on 2005-02.
10. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D. and Lenzerini, M., A Framework for ontology integration. In Proceedings of the 2001 Int. Semantic Web Working Symposium, 2001, 303-316.
11. Damasio, C.V., Analyti, A., Antoniou, G. and Wagner, G., Supporting open and closed world reasoning on the Web. In Proceedings of Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning (PPSWR06) LNCS, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2005, 21-36.
12. Das, S., Deductive Databases and Logic Programming. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, 1992.
13. De Bruijn, J., Eiter, T., Polleres, A. and Tompits H., On representational issues about combinations of classical theories with nonmonotonic rules. DERI Technical Report, retrieved from http://www.deri.at/digital-library/browse/technical-reports/ on 2006-03.
14. Haastrup, P. and Wurtz, J. (eds.) Environmental Data Exchange Network for Inland Water. ISBN 978-0-444-52973-2. Elsevier, New York, 2007.
15. Jung, E.-C., Sato, K., Chen, Y., He, X., MacTavish, T. and Cracchiolo, D., DIF knowledge management system: Bridging viewpoints for interactive system design. In Proceeding 11th Human Computer Interaction International Conference (Las Vegas, Nevada USA), 2005.
16. Michael Stonebraker, Paul Brown and Martine Herbach, Interoperability, distributed applications and distributed databases: The virtual table interface. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 21 (3), 25-33.
17. Ng., G., Open vs. closed world, rules vs. queries: Use cases from industry. In OWL experiences and directions workshop (Galway, Ireland), 2005.
18. Pan, Z. and He.in, J., DLDB: Extending relational databases to support semantic Web queries. Technical Report LU-CSE-04-006, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/ ~he.in/pubs/psss03-poster.pdf on 2006-01.
19. Patel-Schneider, P.F. and Horrocks I., A Comparison of two modelling paradigms in the semantic Web. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2006), ACM, 2006, 3-12.
20. Ribière, M. and Dieng-Kuntz, R., A viewpoint model for cooperative building of an ontology. In Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2002), (Borovets, Bulgaria), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2002, 220-234.
21. Sheth, A. and Larson, J., Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22 (3), 183-230.
22. Spaccapietra, S., Parent, C. and Vangenot, C., GIS databases: From multiscale to MultiRepresentation. In Proceedings 4th InternationalSymposium, SARA-2000 (Horseshoe Bay, Texas, USA), 2000, 57-70.
23. Stjernholm, M., Preux, D., Sortkjaer, O. and Zuo, L., DILIVERABLE 17, Structured list integration into IW distributed semantic hybrid agents application, The Environmental Data Exchange Network for Inland Water (EDEN-IW) project, retrieved from http://www.eden-iw.org on 2006-05.