Prospective randomized study of the restenotic process in small coronary arteries using a carbofilm™ coated stent in comparison with plain old balloon angioplasty: A multicenter study

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 920-927

  Braun, Peter ^a,b  

^a Heart Center Duisburg   (Germany)

^b NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Passive stent coating; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Restenosis; Small coronary arteries

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESTENOSIS; REVASCULARIZATION;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RESEARCH DESIGN; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38049078734     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21306     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hirschfeld J, Schwartz J, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedural variables to restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991:18(3):647-656.
2. Foley DP, Melkert R, Serruys PW, et al. Influence of coronary vessel size on renarrowing process and late angiographic outcome after successful coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1994:90: 1239-1251.
3. Akiyama T, Moussa I, Reimers B, et al. Angiographic and clinical outcome following coronary stenting of small vessels: A comparison with coronary stenting of large vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1610-1618.
4. Mehram R, Hong MK, Lansky A, et al. Vessel size and lesion length influance late clinical outcome after native coronary artery stent placement. Circulation 1998;98:171-174.
5. Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirschinger J, Schömig A. Vessel size and longterm outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation 1998;98:1875-1880.
6. Fishman D, Leon M, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent restenosis study investigators. N Engl J Med 1994:331:496-501.
7. Serruys P, deJaegere P, et al. A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994:331:489-495.
8. Dussaillant G, Mintz G, et al. Small stent size and intimai hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: A volumetric intravascular ultrasoubd analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995:26:720-724.
9. Savage MP, Fischman DL, Rake R, et al. Efficacy of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998:31: 307-311.
10. Schalij MJ, Doucet S, Hilton D, et al. The SISA study: A randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty and stent to prevent restenosis in small arteries. Circulation 2001;104:2029-2033.
11. Mintz G, Kent K, Pichard A, et al. Contibution of inadequate arterial remodeling to the development of focal coronary artery stenosis:an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1997; 95:1791-1799.
12. Hoffmann R, Mintz G, Dussailant G, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996:94:1247-1254.
13. Morice M, Serruys P, Sousa J, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2002:346:1773-1780.
14. Moses J, Leon M, Popma J, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stants in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003:349:1315-1323.
15. Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, et al. Randomized study to asses the effectiveness of slow- and moderate release polymer based paclitaxel eluting stent for coronary artery lesions. Circulation 2003;108:788-794.
16. Stone G, Ellis S, Cox D, et al. A polymer based, paclitaxel eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:221-231.
17. Trabattoni D, Montorsi P, Fabbiocchi F, Loaldi A, Ravagnani P, Galli S, Cozzi S, Grancini L, Bartorelli A. Clinical experience with the Carbostent in "real world" coronary lesions. Am J Cardiol 2001:88 (Suppl 5a).
18. Mut-Vitcu B, Maximov D, Dina C, Slovenski M, Gaita D, Ionac A, Dragulescu S. Primary stenting in angiographic small coronary arteries using a carbon coated stent. Am J Cardiol 2002:90 (Suppl 6A):75H.
19. Bartorelli A, Trabbatoni D, Montorsi P, Fabbiocchi F, Galli S, Ravagnani P, Grancini L, Cozzi S, Loaldi A. Aspirin alone antiplatelet regimen after intracoronary placement of the carbostent: The antares study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002:55:150-156.
20. Antoniucci D, Bartorelli A, Valenti R, Montorsi P, Santoro G, Fabbiocchi F, Bolognese L, Loaldi A, Trapani M, Trabattoni D. Clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary arterial stenting with the carbostent. Am J Cariol 2000:85:821-825.
21. Holmes D, Hirshfeld J, Faxon D, et al. ACC expert consensus document on coronary artery stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998:32: 1471-1482.
22. Moreno R, Fernandez C, Alfonso F, Hernandez R, et al. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels. A meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1964-1972.
23. Al Suwaidi J, Yen W, Williams D, et al. Comparison of immediate and one-year outcome after coronary angioplasty of narrowing <3mm with those > or = 3mm. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:680-686.
24. Briguori C, Nishida T, Adamian M, et al. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary artery with complex lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;50:390-397.
25. Park S, Lee C, Hong M, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2000:21:1785-1789.
26. Kastrati A, Schömig A, Dischinger J, et al. A randomized trial comparing stenting with balloon angioplasty in small vessels in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. ISAR-SMART study investigators. Circulation 2000:102:2593-2598.
27. Moer R, Myreng Y, Molstad P, et al. Stenting in small coronary arteries (SISCA) trial: A randomized comparison between balloon angioplasty and the heparin-coated beStent. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001:38:1598-1603.
28. Koning R, Eltchaninoff H, Commeau P, et al. BESMART trial investigators. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for small coronary arteries: in-hospital and 6-month clinical and angiographic results. Circulation 2001:104:1604-1608.
29. Doucet S, Schalij M, Vrolix M, et al. Stent placement to prevent restenosis after angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Circulation 2001:104:2029-2033.
30. Garcia E, Gomez-Recio M, Moreno R, et al. Stent reduces restenosis in small vessels: Results of the RAP study (Abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol 2001:37:17A.
31. Savage M, Fischmann D, Kada F, Fry E, Kiernan F, Goldberg S. A randomized comparison of elective stenting and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of small coronary arteries. Circulation 1999:100:I-503(abstract).
32. Haude M, Konorza T, Kalnins U, et al. Heparin-coated stent placement for the management of stenosis in small coronary arteries of symptomatic patients. Circulation 2003:107:1265-1270.
33. Rodriguez A, Rodriguez M, Fernandez C, et al. Final angiogrphic and clinical results of the Latin America Small Vessel Randomized Study (LASMALtrial). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41 (Suppl A):26A (abstract).
34. Bonnier J. The Small Vessel Study (SVS) is a silicon carbide coated stent reducing restenosis in small vessels? Cath Cardiovasc Therap 2002. Available at: http://www.tctmd.com/display/expert/pdf/61096/Bonnier.pdf.
35. Muramatsu T, Iwasaki K, Inoue N, et al. Coronary heart disease stenting in small vessels versus balloon angioplasty study (CHIVAS): A randomized prospective multicenter trial (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002:39 (Suppl A):50A.
36. Tsuchikane E, Takeda Y, Kobuyashi Y, Nishibe A, Kobuyoshi T, Awata N. Which is better for coronary artery disease, stenting or balloon angioplasty plus cilostazol? From results of COMPASS. Circulation 2002:106:II482.
37. Regar E, Serruys P, Bode C, et al. RAVEL study group. Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting BX-Velocity balloon expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002:106:1949-1956.