CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia [3]

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 358, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-

  Glaser, David S ^a  

^a Exempla Saint Joseph Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COLON CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; LEUKEMIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; UNITED STATES; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; NOTE; RADIOGRAPHY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; RADIATION DOSAGE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38049070363     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Martin DR, Semelka RC. Health effects of ionising radiation from diagnostic CT. Lancet 2006;367:1712-4. [Erratum, Lancet 2006;368:1494.]
2. Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, Forman HP. Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1120-4.
3. Picano E. Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: how to escape from a communication inferno. BMJ 2004;329:849-51.