A personalized re-ranking algorithm based on relevance feedback

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4537 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 255-263

  Gong, Bihong ^a   Peng, Bo ^a   Li, Xiaoming ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Personalized; Re ranking; Relevance feedback

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; FEEDBACK; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

PERSONALIZED RE-RANKING ALGORITHM; QUERY REFORMULATION STRATEGY; RELEVANCE FEEDBACK;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 38049056636     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ruthven, I., Laimas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(2), 95-145 (2003)
2. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of American Society of Information System 41(4), 288-297 (1990)
3. Robertson, S.E., Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society of Information Sciences 27(3), 129-146 (1976)
4. White, R., Jose, J., Ruthven, I.: Comparing explicit and implicit feedback techniques for web retrieval: Tree-10 interactive track report. In: Text Retrieval Conference(TREC) (2001)
5. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B.: Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In: Annual ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR), pp. 154-162 (2005)
6. Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S., Ragno, R.: Learning User Interaction Models for Predicting Web Search Result Preferences. In: annual ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR), pp. 3-11 (2006)
7. Beitzel, S. M., Jensen, E. C., Chowdhury, A., Grossman, D., Frieder, O.: Hourly analysis of a very large topically categorized query log. In: Proceedings of SIGIR2004, pp. 321-328 (2004)
8. Joachims, T.: Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In: Proceedings of SIGKDD 2002 (2002)
9. White, R.W., Ruthven, I., Jose, J.M., Van, Rijsbergen, C.J.: Evaluating implicit feedback models using searcher simulations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) (2005)
10. Kelly, D., Teevan, J.: Implicit Feedback for Inferring User Preference: A Bibliography, sigir forum (2003)
11. Shen, X., Tan, B., Zhai, C.: Implicit user modeling for personalized search, CIKM (2005)
12. Oard, D., Jim, J.: Modeling information content using observable behavior. In: proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2001)
13. Voorhees, E.M.: Evaluation by highly relevant documents. In: 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, LA (2001)
14. Jarvelin, K., Kekalainen, J.: IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In: proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval, pp. 41-48 (2000)
15. TREC. http://trec.nist.gov
16. TianWang search engine. http://e.pku.edu.cn
17. Ide, E.: New experiments in relevance feedback. In: Salton, G. (ed.) The Smart Retrieval System, pp. 337-354. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)