Images: To alter or not to alter? The ethics of image modification

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 79-80

  Kremenak, Nellie ^a   Siegel, Sharon Crane ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD;

ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MEDICAL ILLUSTRATION; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PHOTOGRAPHY; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 38049052654     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00283.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Dreifus C : Proving that seeing shouldn't always be believing: a conversation with Hany Farid. The New York Times, D-2, October 2, 2007
2. Pritt B, Cooper K : Digital manipulation of pathologic images. Int J Surg Pathol 2006 14 : 107.
3. Pritt BS, Gibson PC, Cooper K : Digital imaging guidelines for pathology: A proposal for general and academic use. Adv Anat Pathol 2003 10 : 96 100.
4. Rossner M, Yamada KM : What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation. Mike Rossner and Kenneth M. Yamada. J Cell Biol 2004 166 : 11 15.
5. Tsang A, Sweet D, Wood RE : Potential for fraudulent use of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1999 130 : 1325 1329.
6. Wade N : It may look authentic; Here's how to tell it isn't. The New York Times, Science Section, January 2006.
7. Weissman G : Science fraud: from patchwork mouse to patchwork data. FASEB J 2006 20 : 587 590.