Towards a systematic evaluation of protein mutation extraction systems

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1339-1359

  Witte, René ^a   Baker, Christopher J O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Mutation evaluation metrics; Mutation evaluation tasks; Mutation extraction systems

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EVALUATION; GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; GENE MUTATION; POINT MUTATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MUTATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; POINT MUTATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEINS;

EID: 38049046226     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720007003193     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kawabata T, Ota M, Nishikawa K, The protein mutant database, Nucleic Acids Res 27(1):355-357, 1999.
2. Ananiadou S, McNaught J (eds.), Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine, Artech House, London, 2006.
3. Cohen AM, Hersh WR, A survey of current work in biomedical text mining, Brief Bioinform 6:57-71, 2005.
4. Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Kirsch H, Couto F, Facts from text - Is text mining ready to deliver?, PLoS Biol 3:188-191, 2005.
5. Spasic I, Ananiadou S, McNaught J, Kumar A, Text mining and ontologies in biomedicine: Making sense of raw text, Brief Bioinform 6 239-251, 2005.
6. Hirschman L, Blaschke C, Evaluation of text mining in biology, in Baker CJO, Cheung KH (eds.), Semantic Web: Revolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences, Springer Science+ Business Media, New York, pp. 213-246, 2006.
7. Hirschman L, Yeh A, Blaschke C, Valencia A, Overview of BioCreAtIvE: Critical assessment of information extraction for biology, BMC Bioinformatics 6(Suppl 1), 2005.
8. Chang J, Schütze H, Abbreviations in biomedical text, Ananiadou S, McNaught J, (eds.), Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine, Artech House, London, pp. 99-120, 2006.
9. Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Marcel S, Albert S, Tolle R, Casari G, Kirsch H, Automatic extraction of mutations from Medline and cross-validation with OMIM, Nucleic Acids Res 32(1):135-142, 2001.
10. Caporaso JG, Baumgartner WA Jr, Randolph DA, Cohen KB, Hunter L, Mutation-Finder: A high-performance system for extracting point mutation mentions from text, Bioinformatics 23(14):1862-1865, 2007.
11. Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Wu CH, Barker WC, Boeckman B, Ferro S, Gasteiger E, Huang II, Lopez R, Magrane M, Martin MJ, Natale DA, O'Donovan C, Reelaschi N, Yeh LSL, The Universal Protein Resource (UtiiProt), Nucleic Acids Res 33(Database issue):D154-D159, 2005.
12. Federhen S, The taxonomy project, in McEntyre J, Ostell J (eds.), The NCBI Handbook, National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, pp. 4-1-4-34, 2003.
13. Hahn U, Wermter J, Levels of natural language processing for text mining, in Ananiadou S, McNaught J (eds.), Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine, Artech House, London, pp. 13-41, 2006.
14. Leroy G, Chen H, Martinez JD, A shallow parser based on closed-class words to capture relations in biomedical text, J Biomed Inform 36:145-158, 2003.
15. Wattarujeekrit T, Shah PK, Collier N, PASBio: Predicate-argument structures for event extraction in molecular biology, BMC Bioinformatics 5:155, 2004.
16. Leroy C, Chen H, Genescene: An ontology-enhanced integration of linguistic and co-occurrence based relations in biomedical texts, J Am Soc Inf Syst Technol (JASIST) 56(5):457-468, 2005.
17. Witte R, Kappler T, Baker CJO, Ontology design for biomedical text mining, in Baker CJO, Cheung KH (eds.), Semantic Web: Revolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp. 281-313, 2007.
18. Kim JJ, Park JC, BioAR: A naphora resolution for relating protein names to proteome database entries, in Harabagiu S, Farwell D (eds.), ACL 2004: Workshop on Reference Resolution and its Applications, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 79-86, 2004.
19. Witte R, Kappler T, Baker CJO, Enhanced semantic access to the protein engineering literature using ontologies populated by text mining, Int J Bioinform Res Appl 3(3):389-413, 2007.
20. Horn F. Lau AL, Cohen FE, Automated extraction of mutation data from the literature: Application of MuteXt to G protein-coupled receptors and nuclear hormone receptors, Bioinformatics 20(4):557-568, 2004.
21. Witte R, Baker CJO, Combining biological databases and text mining to support new bioinformatics applications, in 10th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3513, Springer, Berlin, pp. 310-321, June 15-17, 2005.
22. Schomburg I, Chang A, Ebeling C, Gremse M, Heldt C, Huhn G, Schomburg D, BRENDA, the enzyme database: Updates and major new developents, Nucleic Acids Res 32(Database issue):D431-D433, 2004.
23. Wittig U, Golebiewski M, Kania R, Krebs O, Mir S, Weidemann A, Anstein S, Saric J, Rojas I, SABIO-RK: Integration and curation of reaction kinetics data, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Data integration in the Life Sciences 2006 (DILS'06), Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, No. 4075, Springer, Hinxton, UK, pp. 94-103, 2007.
24. Goble C, Wolstencroft K, Goderis A, Hull D, Zhao J, Alper P, Lord P, Wroe C, Bethajjame K, Turi D, Stevens R, Oinn T, De Roure D, Knowledge discovery for biology with Taverna, in Baker CJO, Cheung KH (eds.), Semantic Web: Revolutionizing Knomledge Discovery in the Life Sciences Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp. 355-395, 2007.
25. Castaño J, Zhang J, Pustejovsky J, Anaphora resolution in biomedical literature, International Symposium on Reference Resolution, Alicante, Spain, 2002.
26. Gasperin C, Semi-supervised anaphora resolution in biomedical texts, Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Workshop on Linking Natural Language Processing and Biology (BioNLP), New York, 2006.
27. Vlachos A, Gasperin C, Lewin I, Briscoe T, Bootstrapping the recognition and anaphoric linking of namcd entities in Drosophila articles, Pac Symp Biocomput: 100-111, 2006.
28. Couto FM Silva MJ, Coutinho P, ProFAL: PROtein Functional Annotation through Literature, VH Conference on Software Engineering and Databases (JISBD), pp. 747-756, 2003.
29. Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B, Modern Information Retrieval, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, MA, 1999.
30. Manning CD, Schütze H, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
31. Lin CY, ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries, in Proceedings of Workshop or, Text Summarization Branches Out (WAS 2004) Barcelona, Spain, July 25-26, 2004. http://www.isi.edu/~cyl/ ROUGE/
32. Hovy E, Lin C, Zhou L, Evaluating DUC 2005 using Basic Elements, Proceedings of the HLT/EMNLP WorkShop on Text Summarization, DUC 2005 Vancouver, Canada, October 9-40, 2005.
33. Nenkova A, Passonneau RJ, Evaluating content selection in summarization: The pyramid method, Proc HLT/NAACL, pp. 145-152, 2004.
34. Vilain M, Burger J, Aberdeen J, Connolly D, Hirschman L, A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme, in MUC6 '95: Proceedings of the 6th, Conference on Message Understanding, pp. 45-52, 1995.
35. Luo X, On coreference resolution performance Dietrics, in Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conferencee on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 25-32, October 2005.