Evaluating importance of conditions in the set of discovered rules

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4482 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 314-321

  Greco, Salvatore ^a   Slowiński, Roman ^b,c   Stefanowski, Jerzy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^b POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Fuzzy measures; Knowledge discovery; Rule evaluation

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; DATA MINING;

DISCOVERY PROBLEMS; ELEMENTARY CONDITIONS; FUZZY MEASURES; RULE EVALUATION;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 38049034391     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72530-5_37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Bayardo R., Agrawal R., Mining the most interesting rules. In Proc. 5th ACM SIGKDD Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1999, 145-154.
2. Banzhaf, J. F., Weighted voting doesn't work: A mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Review, 19, 1965, 317-343.
3. Greco S., Matarazzo B., Slowinski R., Fuzzy measures as a technique for rough set analysis. In Proc. 6th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques & Soft Computing (EUFIT'98), Aachen, September 7-10, 1998, 99-103.
4. Greco S., Pawlak Z., Slowinski R., Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17, 2004, 345-361
5. Greco S., Mataxazzo B., Slowinski R., Stefanowski J., Importance and interactions of conditions in decision rules. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conference RSCTC 2002, Springer Verlag, LNAI no. 2475, 2002, 255-262.
6. Hilderman R.J., Hamilton H.J, Knowledge Discovery and Measures of Interest. Kluwer Academic Boston, 2002.
7. Jedrzejczak B., An evaluation of conditions in decision rules. Master Thesis (supervisor J.Stefanowski), Poznań Univeristy of Technology, June 2006.
8. Shapley L.S., A value for n-person games. In Kuhn H.W., Tucker A.W. (eds), Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953, 307-317.
9. Slowinski K., Stefanowski J., Siwinski D., Application of rule induction and rough sets to verification of magnetic resonance diagnosis. Fundamenta Informaticae, 53 (no. 3/4), 2002, 345-363.
10. Slowinski R., Stefanowski J., Susmaga R., Rough set analysis of attribute dependencies in technical diagnostics. In Tsumoto S. et al. (eds), Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Machine Discovery, Tokyo, 1996, 284-291.
11. Yao Y.Y., Zhong N., An analysis of quantitative measures associated with rules. In Proc. of the 3rd Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Springer, LNAI no. 1574, 1999, 479-488.