Highly frequent terms and sentence retrieval

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4726 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 217-228

  Losada, David E ^a   Fernández, Ronald T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Sentence retrieval; Term frequency

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; FEEDBACK; QUERY LANGUAGES; ROBUST CONTROL;

RETRIEVED DATA; SENTENCE RETRIEVAL; TERM FREQUENCY;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 38049027981     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75530-2_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Abdul-Jaleel, N., Allan, J., Croft, B., Diaz, F., Larkey, L., Li, X., Smucker, M., Wade, C.: UMass at TREC 2004: Novelty and Hard. In: Proc. TREC-2004, the 13th Text Retrieval Conference (2004)
2. Allan, J., Wade, C., Bolivar, A.: Retrieval and novelty detection at the sentence level. In: Proc. SIGIR-2003, the 26th ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Toronto, Canada, pp. 314-321. ACM Press, New York (2003)
3. Amati, C., van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 20(4), 357-389 (2002)
4. Buckley, C., Singhal, A., Mitra, M., Salton, C.: New retrieval approaches using SMART: TREC 4. In: Harman, D. (ed.) Proc. TREC-4, pp. 25-48 (1996)
5. Cardie, C., Ng, V., Pierce, D., Buckley, C.: Examining the role of statistical and linguistic knowledge sources in a general-knowledge question-answering system. In: Proc. ANLP-2000, the 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, Seattle, Washington, pp. 180-187 (2000)
6. Collins-Thompson, K., Ogilvie, P., Zhang, Y., Callan, J.: Information filtering, novelty detection, and named-page finding. In: Proc. TREC-2002 (2002)
7. Dkaki, T., Mothe, J.: TREC novelty track at IRIT-SIC In: Proc. TREC-2004, the 13th text retrieval conference (2004)
8. Harman, D.: Overview of the TREC 2002 novelty track. In: Proc. TREC-2002 (2002)
9. Kwok, K.L., Deng, P., Dinstl, N., Chan, M.: TREC 2002 web, novelty and filtering track experiments using PIRCS. In: Proc. TREC-2002, the 11th text retrieval conference (2002)
10. Larkey, L., Allan, J., Connell, M., Bolivar, A., Wade, C.: UMass at TREC 2002:cross language and novelty tracks. In: Proc. TREC-2002 (2002)
11. Li, X., Croft, B.: Novelty detection based on sentence level patterns. In: Proc. CIKM-2005. ACM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM Press, New York (2005)
12. Mani, I., Maybury, M.T.: Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
13. Murdock, V.: Aspects of sentence retrieval. PhD thesis, Univ. Massachussetts (2006)
14. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Jones, S., HancockBeaulieu, M.M., Gatford, M.: Okapi at TREC-3. In: Harman, D. (ed.) Proc. TREC-3, the 3rd Text Retrieval Conference, pp. 109-127. NIST (1995)
15. Schiffman, B.: Experiments in novelty detection at Columbia university. In: Proc. TREC-2002, the 11th text retrieval conference (2002)
16. Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H., Moricz, M.: Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. ACM SIGIR Forum 33(1), 6-12 (1999)
17. Soboroff, I.: Overview of the TREC 2004 novelty track. In: Proc. TREC-2004, the 13th text retrieval conference (2004)
18. Soboroff, I., Harman, D.: Overview of the TREC 2003 novelty track. In: Proc. TREC-2003, the 12th text retrieval conference (2003)
19. Stokes, N., Carthy, J.: First story detection using a composite document representation. In: Proc. of HTL-01, the Human Language Technology Conference, San Diego, USA (March 2001)
20. Tombros, A., Sanderson, M.: Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval. In: Proc. SIGIR-1998, the 21st ACM Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 1998, pp. 2-10. ACM Press, New York (1998)
21. Voorhees, E.: Using Wordnet to disambiguate word senses for text retrieval. In: Proc. SIGIR-1993, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 171-180 (1993)
22. Voorhees, E., Harman, D.: Overview of the eight text retrieval conference. In: Proc. TREC-8, the 8th text retrieval conference (1999)
23. Voorhees, E., Harman, D. (eds.): The TREC AdHoc Experiments, chapter The TREC AdHoc Experiments, pp. 79-97. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
24. White, R., Jose, J., Ruthven, I.: A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching. Information Processing and Management 39, 707 733 (2003)
25. White, R., Jose, J., Ruthven, I.: Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 56(10), 1113-1125 (2005)
26. Xu, J., Croft, B.: Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In: Proc. SIGIR-1996, Zurich, Switzerland, July 1996, pp. 4-11 (1996)
27. Zhang, H.P., Xu, H.B., Bai, S., Wang, B., Cheng, X.Q.: Experiments in TREC 2004 novelty track at CAS-ICT. In: Proc. TREC-2004 (2004)
28. Zhang, M., Song, R., Lin, C., Ma, S., Jiang, Z., Jin, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, L.: THU TREC 2002: Novelty track experiments. In: Proc. TREC-2002, the 11th text retrieval conference (2002)