Farmworker housing and spaces of belonging in Woodburn, Oregon

Geographical Review

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 520-541

  Nelson, Lise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Belonging; Farmworkers; Housing; Oregon

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY; HOUSING PROJECT; HUMAN SETTLEMENT; LOW INCOME HOUSING; PLANNING HISTORY; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; UNITED STATES; WOODBURN;

EID: 38049014518     PISSN: 00167428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00410.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alarcón-González, D., and T. McKinley. 1999. The Adverse Effects of Structural Adjustment on Working Women in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives 26 (3): 103-118.
2. Alejandro, R. 1993. Hermeneutics, Citizenship and the Public Sphere. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Allensworth, E. M., and R. I. Rochin. 1998. Ethnic Transformation in Rural California: Looking Beyond the Immigrant Farmworker. Rural Sociology 63 (1): 26-50.
4. Anderson, K., and A. Taylor. 2005. Exclusionary Politics and the Question of National Belonging. Ethnicities 5 (4): 460-485.
5. Baker, S. G. 1997. The "Amnesty" Aftermath: Current, Policy Issues Stemming from the Legalization Programs of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act. International Migration Review 31 (1): 5-27.
6. Castles, S., and A. Davidson. 2000. Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. New York: Routledge.
7. City of Woodburn [Oregon]. 1991. City Council meeting minutes. 12 August.
8. Cornelius, W. A., and J. A. Bustamante, eds. 1989. Mexican Migration to the United States: Origins, Consequences, and Policy Options. San Diego: University of California, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
9. CRB [Crop Reporting Board]. 1980. Farm Labor. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
10. Croucher, S.L. 2004. Globalization and Belonging: The Politics of Identity in a Changing World. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
11. Current, T., and M. Martinez Infante. 1959. And Migrant Problems Demand Attention. Salem: Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries.
12. Debuse, N. 1991. HUD Sides with Plaza del Sol. Woodburn [Oregon] Independent, 11 October, 1, 2.
13. Debuse, N. 1995. National Convention Tours Woodburn's Nuevo Amanecer Apartments. Woodburn [Oregon] Independent, 10 July, 1.
14. FHDC [Farmworker Housing Development Corporation]. 1991a. Farmworker Housing Development Corporation Bylaws, 21 June.
15. FHDC [Farmworker Housing Development Corporation] 1991b. Farmworker Housing Needs Assessment and Recommendations for Woodburn, Oregon. Woodburn, Ore.: Farmworker Housing Development Corporation.
16. FHDC [Farmworker Housing Development Corporation] 1992. Farmworker Housing Development Corporation Board meeting minutes. 16 September.
17. Flores, E. 2004. Festejando Community: Celebrating Fiesta Mexicana in Woodburn, Oregon. In Chicanas and Chicanos in Contemporary Society, edited by R. M. De Anda, 219-232. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
18. Ford Foundation. 1989. Affordable Housing: The Years Ahead. New York: Ford Foundation.
19. Fortier, A. 2000. Migrant Belongings: Memory, Space, Identity. New York: Berg.
20. Friedman, J., and S. Randeria, eds. 2004. Worlds on the Move: Globalization, Migration and Cultural Security. New York: I. B. Tauris.
21. Gamboa, E. [1990] 2000. Mexican Labor & World War II: Braceros in the Pacific Northwest, 1942-1947. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
22. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
23. Grijalva, A. 1995. FHDC Has New Hope for Downtown. Woodburn [Oregon] Independent, 12 July, 1.
24. Hardwick, S. W. 1993. Russian Refuge: Religion, Migration, and Settlement on the North American Pacific Rim. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Harrison, B., and B. Bluestone. 1990. The Great U-Turn: Corporate Restructuring and the Polarizing of America. New York: Basic Books.
26. Henderson, T. 1990. Cold Reality in Migrant Housing: Farmworkers Shiver through Season. Woodburn [Oregon] Independent, 19 December, 2.
27. Henderson, T. 1991. Landlords Told to Fix Complex. Woodburn [Oregon] Independent, 6 February, 2.
28. Ho, E. 2006. Negotiating Belonging and Perceptions of Citizenship in a Transnational World: Singapore, a Cosmopolis? Social and Cultural Geography 7 (3): 385-401.
29. Holden, C. 2002. Bitter Harvest: Housing Conditions of Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers. In The Human Cost of Food: Farmworkers' Lives, Labor and Advocacy, edited by C. D. Thompson and M. F. Wiggins, 169-194. Austin: University of Texas Press.
30. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 1994. Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Jones, R.C. 1995. Ambivalent Journey: U.S. Migration and Economic Mobility in North-Central Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
32. Kandel, W., and J. Cromartie. 2004. New Patterns of Hispanic Settlement in Rural America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
33. Kearney, M. 2000. Transnational Oaxacan Indigenous Identity: The Case of Mixtecs and Zapotecs. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 7 (2): 173-195.
34. Lawson, V. 1999. Questions of Migration and Belonging: Understanding of Migration Under Neoliberalism in Ecuador. International Journal of Population Geography 5 (4): 261-276.
35. Loprinzi, M. 1991. Hispanic Migrant Labor in Oregon, 1940-1990. M.A. thesis, Portland State University.
36. Mackie, G. 1990. The Rise and Fall of the Forest Workers' Cooperatives of the Pacific Northwest. M.S. thesis, University of Oregon.
37. Mann, G. 2001. The State, Race, and "Wage Slavery" in the Forest Sector of the Pacific North-West United States. Journal of Peasant Studies 29 (1): 61-88.
38. Manzo, K.A. 1996. Creating Boundaries: The Politics of Race and Nation. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
39. Marion County. 1988. Report of the Special Seasonal Farmworker Housing Task Force. Salem, Ore.: Marion County Board of Commissioners.
40. Marshall, J., and N. Foster. 2002. "Between Belonging": Habitus and the Migration Experience. Canadian Geographer 46 (1): 63-83.
41. Martinis, C. 1990. Solution Eludes Migrant Housing Problem. The Oregonian [Portland], 15 June, §D, 2.
42. Mason, R. 1989. Farm Labor Demand for Six Oregon Crops. Corvallis: Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station.
43. Massey, D. S., and K. E. Espinosa. 1997. What's Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 102 (4): 939-999.
44. Massey, D. S., L. Goldring, and J. Durand. 1994. Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities. American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1492-1533.
45. McMichael, P., ed. 1994. The Global Restructuring of Agro-Food Systems. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
46. Mehta, K., S. M. Gabbard, V. Barrat, M. Lewis, D. Carroll, and R. Mines. 2000. Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) 1997-1998: A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farmworkers. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Program Economics.
47. Mitchell, D. 1996. The Lie of the Land: Migrant Workers and the California Landscape. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
48. Murphy, A. D., C. Blanchard, and J. A. Hill, eds. 2001. Latino Workers in the Contemporary South. Southern Anthropological Society Proceedings, No. 34. Athens: University of Georgia.
49. Nelson, L. Forthcoming. Racialized Landscapes: Whiteness and the Struggle over Farmworker Housing in Woodburn, Oregon. Cultural Geographies.
50. Nevins, J. 2002. Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the "Illegal Alien" and the Making of the U.S.-Mexico Boundary. New York: Routledge.
51. ORHC [Oregon Rural Housing Coalition]. 1982. Report on Rural Housing. Salem: Oregon Rural Housing Coalition.
52. Pallack, K. 1991. Oregon Farm Labor Housing Survey. Newberg, Ore.: CASA of Oregon.
53. Pastor, M., and C. Wise. 1997. State Policy, Distribution and Neoliberal Reform in Mexico. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program.
54. Peters, E. D. 2000. Polarizing Mexico: The Impact of Liberalization Strategy. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
55. Roberts, M. W. 1986. The Dilemma of Farmworker Housing: An Issue of Statewide Concern in Oregon. Salem: Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries.
56. Rothenberg, D. 1998. With These Hands: The Hidden World of Migrant Farmworkers Today. New York: Harcourt Brace.
57. Rouse, R. 1995. Questions of Identity-Personhood and Collectivity in Transnational Migration to the United States. Critique of Anthropology 15 (4): 351-380.
58. Sassen, S. 1998. Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: New Press.
59. Sassen, S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
60. Singer, A. 2004. The Rise of New Immigrant Gateways. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. [www3.brookings.edu/urban/pubs/20040301_gateways.pdf].
61. Smithson, M. J. 1976. Of Icons and Motorcycles: A Sociological Study of Acculturation among Russian Old Believers in Central Oregon and Alaska. Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon.
62. Stephen, L. 2001. The Story of PCUN and the Farmworker Movement in Oregon. University of Oregon, Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics.
63. Stuesse, A. C. 2003. Hablando "Mexicano": La restructuración industrial y los desafíos para la organización a través de la diferencia en un Mississippi transnacional. Estudios Migratorios Latino-americanos 17 (52): 603-626.
64. Thompson, C. D., and M. F. Wiggins, eds. 2002. The Human Cost of Food: Farmworkers' Lives, Labor and Advocacy. Austin: University of Texas.
65. Tönnies, F. 1957. Community and Society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). Translated and edited by Charles P. Loomis. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
66. Trudeau, D. 2006. Politics of Belonging in the Construction of Landscapes: Place-Making, Boundary-Drawing and Exclusion. Cultural Geographies 13 (3): 421-443.
67. USCB [U.S. Census Bureau]. 1963. Census of Population, 1960. Vol. 1, Characteristics of the Population. Part 39, Oregon, General Population Characteristics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
68. USCB [U.S. Census Bureau]. 1973. 1970 Census of Population. Vol. 1, Characteristics of the Population. Part 39, Oregon. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
69. USCB [U.S. Census Bureau]. 1981. 1977 Census of Manufactures. Vol. 3, Geographic Area Statistics. Part 2, General Summary, Nebraska-Wyoming. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
70. USCB [U.S. Census Bureau]. 1982. 1980 Census of Population]. Vol. 1, Characteristics of the Population. Chap. B, General Population Characteristics. Part 39, Oregon. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
71. USCB [U.S. Census Bureau]. 1990. 1987 Census of Manufactures. Geographic Area Series, Oregon. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
72. USCB [U.S. Census Bureau]. 2000. United States Census 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau. [www.census.gov/main/www/ cen2000.html].
73. USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture]. 2004a. 2002 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, Geographic Area Series. Part 37, Oregon, State and County Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. [www.nass.usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/or/index1.htm].
74. USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture]. 2004b. U.S. Census of Agriculture 1987, 1992, 1997. Cornell University, Albert R. Mann Library. [http:// agcensus.mannlib.cornell.edu/show2.php].
75. Woodburn Independent. 1991. Boarding House Shut, Code Violations Cited. Woodburn [Oregon] Independent, 2 January, 1-2.
76. Zúñiga, V., and R. Hernández-León. 2004. New Destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.