AAPL practice guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 35, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Mossman, Douglas ^a   Noffsinger, Stephen G ^a   Ash, Peter ^a   Frierson, Richard L ^a   Gerbasi, Joan ^a   Hackett, Maureen ^a   Lewis, Catherine F ^a   Pinals, Debra A ^a   Scott, Charles L ^a   Sieg, Karl G ^a   Wall, Barry W ^a   Zonana, Howard V ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNESIA; ANXIETY; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIORAL STRESS; CIVIL DEFENSE; CIVIL RIGHTS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; CONFIDENTIALITY; COUNTER TRANSFERENCE; COURT; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL LAW; CULTURAL COMPETENCE; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; DEFENSE MECHANISM; DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; DELINQUENCY; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; EMOTIONALITY; ETHICS; FEE; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FREEDOM; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HOMICIDE; HONESTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN DIGNITY; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPRETER SERVICE; INTERVIEW; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; KNOWLEDGE; LAW; LAWYER; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL COMPETENCE; LEGAL PROCEDURE; MALINGERING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL HOSPITAL; MENTAL PATIENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOOD DISORDER; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OFFENDER; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSONALITY DISORDER; POLICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RAPE; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SCHIZOPHRENIC REACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SELF DEFENSE; SEXUAL CRIME; SIGN LANGUAGE; SKILL; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SYMPTOM; TRANSFERENCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE; WITNESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; DOCUMENTATION; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL DISORDERS; MINORS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38049005905     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (280)

1. Melton GB, Petrilla J, Poythress NG, et al: Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers (ed 2). New York: Guilford Press, 1997
2. McGarry AL: Competency to Stand Trial and Mental Illness. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health, 1973
3. Skeem JL, Golding SL, Berge G, et al: Logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial. Law Hum Behav 22:519-47, 1998
4. Bonnie RJ, Grisso T: Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders, in Youth on Trial: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice. Edited by Grisso T, Schwartz RG. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp 73-103
5. Poythress NG, Nicholson R, Otto RK, et al: The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool - Criminal Adjudication: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1999
6. Winick BJ, DeMeo TL: Comperency to stand trial in Florida. Univ Miami L Rev 35:31, 1980
7. Blackstone W: Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1765-1769
8. Slovenko R: Psychiatry and Law. New York: Lirtle, Brown, 1974
9. Frith's Case, 22 How. State Trials 307 (1790)
10. United States v. Chisolm, 149 F. 284 (C.C.S.D. Ala. 1906)
11. Jordan v. State, 135 S.W. 327 (Tenn. 1911)
12. Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996)
13. King v. Pritchard, 173 Eng. Rep. 135 (1836)
14. Youtsey v. United States, 97 F. 937 (6th Cir. 1899)
15. United States v. Boylen, 41 F.Supp. 724, 725 (D. Or. 1941)
16. Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960)
17. Pub. L. No. 98-473, 98 Stat. 2057 (1984)
18. 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d)(2007 Supp.)
19. Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975)
20. Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993)
21. Burt MN, Philipsborn JT: Assessment of client competence: a suggested approach. Champion 22:18-26, 55-8, 1998
22. Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966)
23. Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981)
24. Buchanau v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402 (1987)
25. Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437 (1992)
26. Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972)
27. Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992)
28. Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003)
29. Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)
30. United States v. Nichelson, 550 F.2d 502 (8th Cir. 1977)
31. Cowley v. Stricklin, 929 F.2d 640 (11th Cir. 1991)
32. Torres v. Prunty, 233 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2000)
33. Tiller v. Esposito, 911 F.2d 575 (11th Cir. 1990)
34. Wolf v. United States, 430 F.2d 443 (10th Cir. 1970)
35. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989)
36. Miles v. Dorsey, 61 F.3d 1459 (10th Cir. 1995)
37. United States v. Leggett, 162 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 1998)
38. United States v. Morrison, 153 F.3d 34 (2d Cir. 1998)
39. Burket v. Angelone, 208 F.3d 172 (4th Cir. 2000)
40. Moody v. Johnson, 139 F. 3d 477 (5th Cir. 1998)
41. United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir. 1994)
42. Oats v. Singletary, 141 F.3d 1018 (11th Cir. 1998)
43. People v. Baugh, 832 N.E.2d 903 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005)
44. Lawrence v. State, 169 S.W.3d 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)
45. United States v. Gold, 790 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1986)
46. United States v. Williams, 998 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1993)
47. United States v. Santos, 131 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 1997)
48. Blum GL: Adequacy of defense counsel's representation of criminal client - issues of incompetency. ALR 5th. 70:1, 1999
49. Curry v. Zant, 371 S.E.2d 647 (Ga. 1988)
50. Hull v. Kyler, 190 F.3d 88 (3rd Cir. 1999)
51. Woods v. State, 994 S.W.2d 32 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
52. In the Matter of Fleming, 16 P.3d 610 (Wash. 2001) (en banc)
53. State v. Stock, 463 S.W.2d 889 (Mo. 1971)
54. Hayden v. Commonwealth, 563 S.W.2d 720 (Ky. 1978)
55. Thompson v. Commonwealth, 56 S.W.3d 406 (Ky. 2001)
56. United States v. Wayt, 24 Fed.Appx. 880 (10th Cir. 2001)
57. United States v. Veatch, 842 F.Supp. 480 (W.D. Okla. 1993)
58. Terry v. State, 105 So.386 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
59. State v. Barber, 617 So.2d 974 (La. Ct. App. 1993)
60. People v. Doe, 602 N.Y.S.2d 507 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 1993)
61. State v. Schaim, 600 N.E.2d 661 (Ohio 1992)
62. State v. Natividad, 526 P.2d 730 (Ariz. 1974)
63. Holmes v. State, 494 So.2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
64. Shook v. State, 552 So.2d 841 (Miss. 1989), writ of habeas corpus denied, Shook v. Mississippi, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8851 (N.D. Miss. 2000)
65. State v. Burnett, 2005 Ohio 49 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
66. United States v. Jones, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9257 (E.D. Tenn. 2006)
67. Wilson v. United States, 391 F.2d 460 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
68. United States v. Rinchack, 820 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir. 1987)
69. United States v. Borum, 464 F.2d 896 (10th Cir. 1972)
70. United States v. Davis, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1030 (10th Cir. 1999)
71. State v. Ferguson, 547 P.2d 1085 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976)
72. State v. Gilbert, 640 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1994)
73. State v. Martens, 521 N.W.2d 768 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994)
74. United States v. Swanson, 572 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1978)
75. State v. Owens, 807 P.2d 101 (Kan. 1991)
76. People v. Palmer, 31 P.3d 863 (Colo. 2001)
77. United States v. Stubblefield, 325 F.Supp 485 (D.C. Tenn. 1971)
78. People v. Stanhope, 254 N.E.2d 512 (Ill. 1969)
79. Carter v. State, 21 So.2d 404 (Miss. 1945)
80. Hansford v. United States, 365 F.2d 920 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
81. State v. Madden, 33 P.3d 549 (Haw. Ct. App. 2001)
82. Casey v. State, 924 S.W.2d 946 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
83. Bradley v. Preston, 263 F.Supp. 283 (D. D.C. 1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 990 (1968)
84. Purver JM: Amnesia as affecting capacity to commit crime or stand trial. ALR 3d. 46:544, 1972
85. Morrow v. State, 423 A.2d 251 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980)
86. State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001)
87. State v. McClendon, 437 P. 2d 421 (Ariz. 1968)
88. Rector v. State, 638 S.W.2d 672 (Ark. 1982), later app. 659 S.W.2d 168 (Ark. 1983), cert. den. 466 U.S. 988 (1984)
89. State v. Forsyth, 547 N.W.2d 833 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996)
90. State v. Leming, 3 S.W.3d 7 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998)
91. Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 60 (1932)
92. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
93. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
94. State v. Taylor, 776 A.2d 1154 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001)
95. Vanisi v. State, 22 P.3d 1164 (Nev. 2001)
96. Barnes v. State, 528 S.W.2d 370 (Ark. 1975)
97. Com. v. Martin, 683 N.E.2d 280 (Mass. 1997)
98. State v. Vermillion, 51 P.3d 188 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)
99. Sherwood v. State, 717 N.E.2d 131 (Ind. 1999)
100. People v. Burnett, 234 Cal. Rptr. 67 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)
101. People v. Williams, 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 732 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)
102. Dobbins v. State, 721 N.E.2d 867 (Ind. 1999)
103. Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418 (Fla. 2001)
104. State v. Briggs, 787 A.2d 479 (R.I. 2001)
105. State v. Coleman, 644 N.W.2d 283 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002)
106. People v. Manson, 139 Cal. Rptr. 275 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 953 (1978)
107. People v. Davis, 234 Cal. Rptr. 859 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)
108. State v. Plunkett, 934 P.2d 113 (Kan. 1997)
109. People v. Eady, 755 N.Y.S.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
110. Stepp v. Estelle, 524 F2.d 447 (5th Cir. 1975)
111. State v. Hartford, 636 P.2d 1204 (Ariz. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 933 (1982), reh. denied, 456 U.S. 1001 (1982), and later app., 651 P.2d 856 (Ariz. 1982)
112. Bridges v. State, 6 P.3d 1000 (Nev. 2000)
113. State v. Rose, 809 A.2d 534 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)
114. People v. Anderson, 247 N.W.2d 857 (Mich. 1976)
115. United States v. Purnett, 910 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1990)
116. Mossman D, Dunseith NW Jr: "A fool for a client": print portrayals of 49 pro se criminal defendants. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 29:408-19, 2001
117. Rogers R, Sewell KW, Goldstein AM: Explanatory models of malingering: a prototypical analysis. Law Hum Behav 18:543-52, 1994
118. Gothard S, Rogers R, Sewell KW: Feigning incompetency to stand trial: an investigation of the Georgia Court Competency Test. Law Hum Behav 19:363-73, 1995
119. Perlin ML: The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1994
120. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) (Scalia, J., dissenting)
121. United States v. Greer, 158 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 1998)
122. United States v. Binion, 132 Fed.Appx. 89 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 919 (2005)
123. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)
124. Darani S: Behavior of the defendant in a competency-to-stand-trial evaluation becomes an issue in sentencing. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:126-8, 2006
125. Fisher WH, Packer IK, Grisso T, et al: From case management to court clinic: examining forensic system involvement of persons with severe mental illness. Ment Health Serv Res 2:41-9, 2000
126. Golding SL, Roesch R: Competency for adjudication: an international analysis, in Law and Mental Health: International Perspectives (vol 4). Edited by Weisstub DN. New York: Pergamon, 1988, pp 73-109
127. People v. Stanfill, 229 Cal. Rptr. 215 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)
128. People v. Robinson, 61 Cal. Rptr. 2d 587 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)
129. Randleman v. State, 837 S.W.2d 449 (Ark. 1992)
130. Grisso T: Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (ed 2). New York: Plenum Press, 2003
131. Geller JL, Fisher WH, Kaye NS: Effect of evaluations of competency to stand trial on the state hospital in an era of increased community services. Hosp Community Psychiatry 42:818-23, 1991
132. rd Cir. 1975)
133. Maryland v. Pratt, 398 A.2d 421 (Md. 1979)
134. Noggle v. Marshall, 706 F.2d 1408, 1414 (6th Cir. 1983)
135. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985)
136. Diamond BL: The forensic psychiatrist: consultant versus activist in legal doctrine. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 20:119-32, 1992
137. Sadoff RL: Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 12:243-52, 1984
138. American Bar Association Criminal Justice Standards Committee: ABA Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, 1989
139. Gutheil TG, Appelbaum PS: Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law (ed 3). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000
140. Slobogin C: Mental illness and the death penalty. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep 24:667-77, 2000
141. Appelbaum PS: The parable of the forensic psychiatrist: ethics and the problem of doing harm. Int J Law Psychiatry 13:249-59, 1990
142. Appelbaum PS: A theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 25:233-47, 1997
143. American Psychiatric Association: The Principles of Medical Ethics: with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry (2001 rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2001
144. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law: Ethics Guidelines for the Practice of Forensic Psychiatry. Adopted May 1987; revised October 1989, 1991, 1995, and 2005
145. Giorgi-Guarnieri D, JanofskyJ, Keram E, et al: AAPL Practice guideline: for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 30(Suppl):S3-S40, 2002
146. MacKinnon B: On not harming: two traditions. J Med Phil 13:313-28, 1988
147. Shuman DW, Greenberg SA: The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: reconciling impartiality and advocacy. Prof Psychol 34:219-24, 2003
148. Mossman D: Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: ethics, in Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Edited by Payne-James J, Byard RW, Corey TS, et al. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2005, pp 359-64
149. Gutheil TG, Simon RI: Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness: early warning signs of endangered honesty, objectivity, and fair compensation. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 27:546-53, 1999; discussion 554-62
150. American Medical Association. Available at www.ama-assn.org. Accessed September 29, 2007
151. Strasburger LH, Gutheil TG, Brodsky A: On wearing two hats: role conflict in serving as both psychotherapist and expert witness. Am J Psychiatry 154:448-56, 1997
152. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Report 12-A-04, Medical Testimony (December 2004). Chicago: AMA, 2004
153. Miller RD: Hospitalization of criminal defendants for evaluation of competence to stand trial or for restoration of competence: clinical and legal issues. Behav Sci Law 21:369-91, 2003
154. United States v. Gomes, 387 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 2004)
155. Sell v. United States, No. 02-5664, Brief Amicus Curiae, American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri in Support of Petitioner, 2002 U.S. Briefs 5664, December 19, 2002
156. Sell v. United States, No. 02-5664, Brief for Amicus Curiae American Psychological Association, 2002 U.S. Briefs 5664, December 19, 2002
157. Sell v. United States, No. 02-5664, Brief Amicus Curiae of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics in Support of the Petitioner, 2002 U.S. Briefs 5664, December 19, 2002
158. Annas GJ: Forcible medication for courtroom competence - the case of Charles Sell. N Engl J Med 350:2297-301, 2004
159. Mossman D: Is prosecution "medically appropriate"? N Engl J Crim Civil Confine 31:15-80, 2005
160. Sell v. United States, No. 02-5664, Brief for the American Psychiatric Association and American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondent, 2002 U.S. Briefs 5664, January 22, 2003
161. American Medical Association: Opinion E-9.07, Medical Testimony. Chicago: AMA, 1994, E-9.07, August 29, 2005
162. Fed. Rules Evid. 702
163. Commons ML, Miller PM, Gutheil TG: Expert witness perceptions of bias in experts. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 32:70-5, 2004
164. Sattar SP, Pinals DA, Gutheil T: Countering countertransference: a forensic trainee's dilemma. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 30:65-9, 2002; discussion 70-63
165. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. Law No. 104-191 (1996)
166. Miller RD, Maier GJ, Kaye M: The right to remain silent during psychiatric examination in civil and criminal cases: a national survey and an analysis. Int J Law Psychiatry 9:77-94, 1986
167. Appelbaum PS: In the wake of Ake: the ethics of expert testimony in an advocate's world. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 15:15-25, 1987
168. Binder RL: Liability for the psychiatrist expert witness. Am J Psychiatry 159:1819-25, 2002
169. Pettus v. Cole, 57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 46 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)
170. Dalton v. Miller, 984 P.2d 666 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999)
171. Miller RD: Criminal competence, in Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry (ed 2). Edited by Rosner R. London: Arnold, 2003, pp 213-32
172. Tseng W, Matthews D, Elwyn TS: Cultural Competence in Forensic Mental Health: A Guide for Psychiatrists, Psychologists, and Attorneys. New York: Brunner/Routledge, 2004
173. Cross T, Bazron B, Dennis K, et al: Towards a Culturally Competent System of Care: A Monograph on Effective Services for Minority Children Who Are Severely Emotionally Disturbed (vol 1). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, 1989
174. Davis K: Race, health status and managed health care, in Cultural Competence for Health Care Professionals Working With African American Communities: Theory and Practice. Edited by Brisbane FL. Bethesda, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, 1998
175. Saldana D. Cultural Competency: A Practical Guide for Mental Health Service Providers. Austin, TX: Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, University of Texas at Austin, 2001
176. Griffith EE: Ethics in forensic psychiatry: a culrural response to Stone and Appelbaum. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 26:171-84, 1998
177. Griffith EE: Personal narrative and an African-American perspective on medical ethics. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33:371-81, 2005
178. Candilis PJ, Martinez R, Dording C: Principles and narrative in forensic psychiatry: toward a robust view of professional role. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 29:167-73, 2001
179. Pinals DA, Packer IK, Fisher W, et al: Relationship between race and ethnicity and forensic clinical triage dispositions. Psychiatr Serv 55:873-8, 2004
180. American Psychiatric Association: Practice Guideline for Psychiatric Evaluation of Adults. Am J Psychiatry 152(Suppl 11):63-80, 1995
181. Resnick PJ: Malingering, in Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry. Edited by Rosner R. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1994, pp 417-26
182. Bonnie RJ: The competence of criminal defendants: beyond Dusky and Drope. Univ Miami L Rev 47:539-601, 1993
183. Bonnie RJ: The comperence of criminal defendants: a theoretical reformulation. Behav Sci Law 10:291-316, 1992
184. Hoge SK, Poythress N, Bonnie RJ, et al: The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: diagnosis, psychopathology, and competence-related abilities. Behav Sci Law 15:329-45, 1997
185. Gutheil TG, Bursztajn H: Clinicians' guidelines for assessing and presenting subtle forms of patient incompetence in legal settings. Am J Psychiatry 143:1020-3, 1986
186. People v. Kashney, 472 N.E.2d 164 (Ill. App. Ct. 1984)
187. People v. Pokovich, 15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 503 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)
188. People v. Jablonski, 126 P.3d 938 (Cal. 2006)
189. Borum R, Grisso T: Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 24:297-317, 1996
190. Lally SJ: What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? - a survey of experts. Prof Psychol 34:491-8, 2003
191. Pinals DA, Tillbrook CE, Mumley DL: Practical application of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA) in a public sector forensic setting. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:179-88, 2006
192. Grisso T: Center for Studies of Antisocial and Violent Behavior (U.S.). Evaluating competencies: forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum Press, 1986
193. Robey A: Criteria for competency to stand trial: a checklist for psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry 122:616-23, 1965
194. Vann CR, Morganroth F: Psychiatry and the competence to stand trial. Univ Det Law J 42:75-85, 1964
195. Hess JH, Thomas HE: Incompetence to stand trial: procedures, results, and problems. Am J Psychiatry 119:713-20, 1963
196. McGarry AL: Competence to stand trial and due process via the state hospital. Am J Psychiatry 122:623-31, 1965
197. Lipsitt PD, Leios D, McGarry AL: Competency for trial: a screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry 128:105-9, 1971
198. Brakel SJ: Presumption, bias, and incompetency in the criminal process. Wisc Law Rev 1974:1105-30, 1974
199. Harvard Medical School Laboratory of Community Psychiatry: Competency to stand trial and mental illness. New York: Jason Aronson, 1974
200. Grisso T: Five-year research update (1986-1990): evaluations for competence to stand trial. Behav Sci Law 10:353-69, 1992
201. Wildman RW, Batchelor ES, Thompson L, et al: The Georgia Court Competency Test: an attempt to develop a rapid quantitative measure for fitness for trial. Milledgeville, GA: Forensic Services Division, Central State Hospital, 1978
202. Johnson WG, Mullett N: The Georgia Court Competency Test-R, in Dictionary of Behavioral Assessment Techniques. Edited by Hersen M, Belleck AS. New York: Pergamon, 1987, pp 80-92
203. Archer RP, Buffington-Vollum JK, Stredny RV, et al: A survey of psychological rest use patterns among forensic psychologists. J Personality Assess 87:84-94, 2006
204. Golding SL, Roesch R, Schreiber J: Assessment and conceptualization of competency to stand trial: preliminary data on the Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview. Law Hum Behav 8:321-34, 1984
205. Golding SL: Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview - Revised (Training Manual and Interview Procedure). State of Utah Division of Mental Health, 1993
206. Skeem J, Golding SL, Emke-Francis P: Assessing adjudicative competency: using legal and empirical principles to inform practice, in Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Edited by O'Donohue W, Levensky E. New York: Elsevier, 2004, pp 175-211
207. Nicholson RA, Kugler KE: Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: a quantitative review of comparative research. Psychol Bull 109:355-70, 1991
208. Schreiber J, Roesch R, Golding S: An evaluation of procedures for assessing competency to stand trial. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 15:187-203, 1987
209. Nicholson RA, Barnard GW, Robbins L, et al: Predicting treatment outcome for incompetent defendants. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 22:367-77, 1994
210. Everington C: The Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR): a validation study. Crim Just Behav 17:147-68, 1990
211. Everington C, Dunn C: A second validation study of the Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR). Crim Just Behav 22:44-59, 1995
212. Poythress NG: Adjudicative Competence: The MacArthur Studies. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002
213. Otto RK, Poythress NG, Nicholson RA, et al: Psychometric properties of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool - Criminal Adjudication. Psychol Assess 10:435-43, 1998
214. Grisso T, Steinberg L, Woolard J, et al: Juveniles' competence to stand trial: a comparison of adolescents' and adults' capacities as trial defendants. Law Hum Behav 27:333-63, 2003
215. Ficke SL, Hart KJ, Deardorff PA: The performance of incarcerated juveniles on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:360-73, 2006
216. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
217. Rogers R, Grandjean N, Tillbrook CE, et al: Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data. Behav Sci Law 19:503-18, 2001
218. Rogers R, Jackson RL, Sewell KW, et al: An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial. Psychol Assess 16:139-45, 2004
219. Rogers R, Jackson RL, Sewell KW, et al: Assessing dimensions of competency to stand trial: construct validation of the ECST-R. Assessment 10:344-51, 2003
220. Rogers R, Sewell KW, Grandjean NR, et al: The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures. Psychol Assess 14:177-83, 2002
221. American Psychological Association: Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (effective June 1, 2003). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2003
222. State v. Griffin, 869 A.2d 640 (Conn. 2005)
223. Warren JI, Fitch WL, Dietz PE: Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 19:63-9, 1991
224. Reich J, Wells J: Psychiatric diagnosis and competency to stand trial. Compr Psychiatry 26:421-32, 1985
225. Roesch R, Eaves D, Sollner R, et al: Evaluating fitness to stand trial: a comparative analysis of fit and unfit defendants. Int J Law Psychiatry 4:145-57, 1981
226. Hubbard KL, Zapf PA, Ronan KA: Competency restoration: an examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency. Law Hum Behav 27:127-39, 2003
227. Miller RD, Germain EJ: The retrospective evaluation of competency to stand trial. Int J Law Psychiatry 11:113-25, 1988
228. Clark v. Arizona, 126 S. Ct. 2709 (2006)
229. Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961 (1956)
230. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Text Revision): DSM-IV-TR (ed 4). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2000
231. Gothard S, Viglione DJ, Meloy JR, et al: Detection of malingering in competency to stand trial evaluations. Law Hum Behav 19:493-505, 1995
232. Lamb HR: Incompetency to stand trial; appropriateness and outcome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:754-8, 1987
233. Mowbray CT: A study of patients treated as incompetent to stand trial. Soc Psychiatry 14:31-9, 1979
234. Rodenhauser P, Khamis HJ: Relationships between legal and clinical factors among forensic hospital patients. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 16:321-32, 1988
235. Noffsinger SG: Restoration to competency practice guidelines. Int J Offend Ther Comp Criminol 45:356-62, 2001
236. Nicholson RA, McNulty JL: Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial. Behav Sci Law 10:371-83, 1992
237. Roesch R, Golding S: Competency to Stand Trial. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, 1980
238. Cuneo DJ, Brelje TB: Predicting probability of attaining fitness to stand trial. Psychol Rep 55:35-9, 1984
239. Carbonell JL, Heilbrun K, Friedman FL: Predicting who will regain trial competency: initial promise unfulfilled. Forensic Rep 5:67-76, 1992
240. Mossman D: Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:34-43, 2007
241. Pinals DA: Where two roads meet: competence to stand trial restoration from a clinical perspective. N Engl J on Criminal & Civil Confinement 31:81-108, 2005
242. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, Committee on Psychiatry and Law: Misuse of Psychiatry in the Criminal Courts: Competency to Stand Trial. New York: Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1974
243. Roesch R, Zapf PA, Golding SL: Defining and assessing competency to stand trial, in Handbook of Forensic Psychology (ed 2). Edited by Weiner IB, Hess AK. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999, pp 327-49
244. Morse SJ: Law and mental health professionals: the limits of expertise. Prof Psychol 9:389-99, 1978
245. Halleck SJ, Hoge SK, Miller RD, et al: The use of psychiatric diagnoses in the legal process: task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 20:481-99, 1992
246. Grisso T: Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations: A Manual for Practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange, 1988
247. Cruise KR, Rogers R: An analysis of competency to stand trial: an integration of case law and clinical knowledge. Behav Sci Law 16:35-50, 1998
248. Plotnick S, Porter J, Bagby M: Is there bias in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial? Int J Law Psychiatry 21:291-304, 1998
249. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2945.38(G)(3)(2006)
250. S.C. Code Ann. § 44-23-420(2006)
251. R.I. Gen. Laws § 40.1-5.3-3(f)(2006)
252. S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-46-2(a)(2004)
253. Tex. Code of Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 46B.025(2006)
254. Poythress NG: Psychological issues in criminal proceedings: judicial preference regarding expert testimony. Law Hum Behav 10:175-94, 1983
255. Redding RE, Floyd MY, Hawk GL: What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar. Behav Sci Law 19:583-94, 2001
256. Cooper DK, Grisso T: Five year research update (1991-1995): evaluations for competence to stand trial. Behav Sci Law 15:347-64, 1997
257. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, § 15(c)(2003)
258. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967)
259. Redding RE, Frost LE: Adjudicative competence in the modern juvenile court. Virginia J Soc Policy Law 9:353-409, 2001
260. G.J.I, v. Oklahoma, 778 P.2d 485 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989)
261. Savitsky JC, Karras D: Competency to stand trial among adolescents. Adolescence 1974:349-58, 1984
262. Cowden VL, McKee GR: Competency to stand trial in juvenile delinquency proceedings: cognitive maturity and the attorney-client relationship. J Fam Law 33:629-61, 1995
263. Cooper DK: Juveniles' understanding of trial-related information: are they competent defendants? Behav Sci Law 15:167-80, 1997
264. McKee GR, Shea SJ: Competency to stand trial in family court: characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 27:65-73, 1999
265. Warren JI, Aaron J, Ryan E, et al: Correlates of adjudicative competence among psychiatrically impaired juveniles. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 31:299-309, 2003
266. Scott ES, Reppucci ND, Woolard JL: Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law Hum Behav 19:221-44, 1995
267. Steinberg L, Cauffman E: Maturity of judgment in adolescence: psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law Hum Behav 20:249-72, 1996
268. Marsteller FA, Brogan D, Smith I, et al: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among juveniles admitted to regional youth detention centers operated by the Georgia Department of Children and Youth Services. Atlanta, GA: Department of Children and Youth Services, 1997
269. Teplin LA, Abram KM, McClelland GM, et al: Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:1133-43, 2002
270. McGaha A, Otto RK, McClaren MD, et al: Juveniles adjudicated incompetent to proceed: a descriptive study of Florida's competence restoration program. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 29:427-37, 2001
271. McKee GR: Competency to stand trial in preadjudicatory juveniles and adults. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 26:89-99, 1998
272. Grisso T: Forensic Evaluation of Juveniles. Juvenile's competence to stand trial. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press, 1998, pp 83-126
273. Barnum R: Clinical and forensic evaluation of competence to stand trial in juvenile defendants, in Youth on Trial: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice. Edited by Grisso T, Schwartz RG. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp 193-224
274. Warren JI, Murrie DC, Stejskal W, et al: Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations. Behav Sci Law 24:113-32, 2006
275. Cooper VG, Zapf PA: Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions. Law Hum Behav 27:423-36, 2003
276. Scott CL: Commentary: a road map for research in restoration of competency to stand trial. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 31:36-43, 2003
277. Pendleton L: Treatment of persons found incompetent to stand trial. Am J Psychiatry 137:1098-100, 1980
278. Davis DL: Treatment planning for the patient who is incompetent to stand trial. Hosp Community Psychiatry 36:268-71, 1985
279. Brown DR: A didacric group program for persons found unfit to stand trial. Hosp Community Psychiatry 43:732-3, 1992
280. Wall BW, Krupp BH, Guilmette T: Restoration of competency to stand trial: a training program for persons with mental retardation. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 31:189-201, 2003