Debating the politics of security studies: Response to Goldmann, Wæver and Williams

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 345-352

  Eriksson, Johan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37949042307     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00108369921961924     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.
2. Eriksson, J. (1999) Agendas, Threats and Politics: Securitization in Sweden. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop: 'Redefining security', Mannheim, 26-31 March 1999.
3. Goldmann, K. (1978) Det internationella systemet: En teori och dess begränsningar. Stockholm: Aldus/Bonniers.
4. Goldmann, K. (1997) 'Miljöhot, migration och terrorister i Tokyo - om begreppet säkerhetspolitik', pp. 3-19 in L. Leiflandet al. (eds) Brobyggare: En vänbok till Nils Andrén. Stockholm: Nerenius and Santérus Förlag.
5. Huysmans, J. (1999) Language and the Mobilization of Security Expectations: The Normative Dilemma of Speaking and Writing Security. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop: 'Redefining security', Mannheim, 26-31 March 1999.
6. Kingdon, J. W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd ed.New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
7. Machiavelli, N. ([1517-1518] 1970) The Discourses. London: Penguin.
8. Neumann, I. B. and Wæver, O. (eds) (1997) The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making. London: Routledge.
9. Smith, S. (1997) Truth and Power: a Reply to William Wallace, Review of International Studies23: 507-516.