Uncertainty of predicted greenhouse tomato production: Mechanistic versus stochastic models?

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 718, Issue , 2006, Pages 139-146

  Schrevens, Eddie ^a   Bojacá, Carlos ^b   Cooman, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSIDAD JORGE TADEO LOZANO   (Colombia)

Author keywords

General linear mixed models; Tomato yield prediction; TOMGRO2; Uncertainty propagation

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 37849189927     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.718.15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Cooman, A. 2002. Feasibility of protected tomato cropping in the high altitude tropics using statistical and system dynamic models for plant growth and development. PhD thesis, K. Universiteit Leuven.
2. Cooman, A. and Schrevens, E. 2003. Sensitivity analysis of TOMGRO output variables to variations in climate conditions. Acta Hort. 654:317-324.
3. Cooman, A. and Schrevens, E. 2003. The uncertainty of TOMGRO predictions caused by variations on model parameters. Acta Hort. 654:155-162.
4. Gary, C., Bertin, N. and Tchamitchian, M. 1996. TOMGRO, un modèle explicatif de fonctionnement de cultures sous serre: un outil pour la recherche et pour l'aide à la décision. p.90-99. In: A. Baille (ed.), Actes du séminaire de l'AIP intersectorielle "Serres", INRA, Avignon, France.
5. Jones, J.W., Dayan, E., Allen, L.H., VanKeulen, H. and Challa, H. 1991. A dynamic tomato growth and yield model (TOMGRO). Trans. ASAE 34(2):663-672.
6. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. and Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc.
7. Marquardt, D.W. 1963. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Industrial and Applied Mathematics 11:431-441.
8. Searle, S.R. 1971. Linear models. Wiley series in probability and statistics.
9. Searle, S.R., Casella, G. and McCulloch, C.E. 2006. Variance components. Wiley series in probability and statistics.