Security and tolerable risk for hydrogen service stations

Technology in Society

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 64-70

  Schjølberg, Ingrid ^a   Østdahl, Anne B ^a  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

Author keywords

Automotive; Fuel; Hydrogen; Natural gas; Norway; Risk; Service station; Tolerable risk

Indexed keywords

FILLING STATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

NORWAY; PETROL STATIONS; TOLERABLE RISK; UNITED STATES;

HYDROGEN STORAGE;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; AUTOMOBILE; HYDROGEN; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 37849028605     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Shinnar R. The hydrogen economy, fuel cells and electric cars. Technol Soc 25 (2003) 455-476
2. Schjolberg I, Lundteigen MA, Bjertnes A. Safety issues and safety philosophy in a small scale hydrogen fuel station. Pisa: H2www; 2004.
3. Ubong EU. Safety issues in hydrogen transportation. In: Proceedings of the electrical insulation conference, and the electrical manufacturing and coil winding technology conference, 2003. p. 395-401.
4. Utgikar V.P., and Thiesen T. Safety of compressed hydrogen fuel tanks. Technol Soc 27 (2005) 315-320
5. Adamson K.A., and Pearson P. Hydrogen and methanol: a comparison of safety, economics, efficiencies and emissions. J Power Sources 86 (2000) 548-555
6. HyNor website. 〈http://www.hynor.no〉.
7. IEC 61508. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic (E/E/PE) safety related systems, 1998. Part 1-7.
8. ISO website. ISO TC 197. Hydrogen technology. 〈http://www.iso.ch〉.
9. ISO websiste. ISO PDTR 15916. Basic considerations for the safety of hydrogen systems. ISO 2001. 〈http://www.iso.ch〉.
10. Rackwitz R. The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes, and predictive cohort life table on risk acceptability criteria. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 (2006) 469-484
11. Kjellen U., and Sklet S. Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process. Part I: A review of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods. Saf Sci 18 (1995) 215-227
12. Aven T. A discussion of the acceptable risk problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 61 (1998) 159-166
13. UK health and safe executive website. 〈http://www.hse.gov.uk〉.
14. Wigger P, Hovel R. Safety assessment-application of CENELEC standards. In: Proceedings of the metro inauguration seminar, Copenhagen, 2002.
15. L-B-Systemtechnik (LBST) website. EIHP2: risk acceptance criteria for hydrogen refuelling stations, 2003. 〈http://www.lbst.de〉.
16. Vatn J. Use of risk acceptance criteria in Norwegian offshore industry. Dilemmas and challenges. In: Proceedings of the ESRE conference, 2003.
17. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) website. Fire in or at service stations and motor vehicle repair and paint shops. Report, April 2002. 〈http://www.nfpa.org〉.