A prospective functional outcome and motion analysis evaluation of the hip abductors after femur fracture and antegrade nailing

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-9

  Archdeacon, Michael ^a   Ford, Kevin R ^b   Wyrick, John ^a   Paterno, Mark V ^b   Hampton, Shelley ^a   Ludwig, Mary Beth ^a   Hewett, Timothy E ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Femur fracture; Functional outcome; Hip abductors; Motion analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GAIT; HIP ABDUCTOR MUSCLE; HUMAN; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; KINEMATICS; LEG MUSCLE; MALE; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE NAILS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY; FRACTURE HEALING; GAIT; HIP JOINT; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37849016680     PISSN: 08905339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816073b6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bain GL, Zacest AC, Paterson DC, et al. Abduction strength following intramedullary nailing of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:93-97.
2. Danckwardt-Lilliestrom G, Sjogren S. Postoperative restoration of muscle strength after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the femoral shaft. Acta Orthop Scand. 1976;47:101-107.
3. Ostrum RF, Agarwal A, Lakatos R, et al. Prospective comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:496-501.
4. Ostrum RF, DiCicco J, Lakatos R, et al. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:464-468.
5. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1984;66:529-539.
6. Winquist RA. Closed intramedullary osteotomies of the femur. Cln Orthop. 1986;212:155-164.
7. Paterno MV, Archdeacon MT, Ford KR, et al. Early rehabilitation following surgical fixation of a femoral shaft fracture. Phys Ther. 2006;86:558-572.
8. Archdeacon MT, Hewett TE, Hampton S, et al. A prospective, functional evaluation of hip abductor function after femur fracture and antegrade nailing. The 20th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, October 8-10; 2004.
9. Perry J. Motion analysis. Gait analysis: Normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 1992.
10. Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, et al. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1999;81:1245-1260.
11. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Fracture and Dislocation Compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:1-158.
12. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1976;58:453-458.
13. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: A new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma. 1984;24:742-746.
14. Dujardin FH, Roussignol X, Mejjad O, et al. Interindividual variations of the hip joint motion in normal gait. Gait Posture. 1997;5:246-250.