Patient selection for lumbar arthroplasty and arthrodesis: The effect of revision surgery in a controlled, multicenter, randomized study

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 13-16

  Geisler, Fred H ^a   Guyer, Richard D ^b   Blumenthal, Scott L ^b   McAfee, Paul C ^c   Cappuccino, Andrew ^d   Bitan, Fabien ^e   Regan, John J ^f  

^a Illinois Neuro Spine Center   (United States)

^b TEXAS BACK INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Scoliosis and Spine Center   (United States)

^d Buffalo Spine Surgery   (United States)

^e Lennox Hill Hospital   (United States)

^f Goldstein and Penenberg Orthopedic Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty; Clinical trial; Patient selection; Revision surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR DISK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COHORT STUDIES; DISABLED PERSONS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; REOPERATION; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37849004997     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/SPI-08/01/013     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565-1575, 2005
2. Duggal N, Mendiondo I, Pares HR, Jhawar BS, Das K, Kenny KJ, et al: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: an outcome analysis. Neurosurgery 54:636-644, 2004
3. Epstein NE, Hood DC: A comparison of surgeon's assessment to patient's self analysis (short form 36) after far lateral lumbar disc surgery. An outcome study. Spine 22:2422-2428, 1997
4. Geisler FH: Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc. Neurosurgery 56 (1 Suppl):ONS46- ONS57, 2005
5. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, et al: Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143-154, 2004
6. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG II, Harrington JF, Magge SN, et al: Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 1:267-272, 2004
7. Hsu CJ, Chou WY, Chang WN, Wong CY: Clinical follow up after instrumentation-augmented lumbar spinal surgery in patients with unsatisfactory outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 5:281-286, 2006
8. Lai PL, Chen LH, Niu CC, Fu TS, Chen WJ: Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine 29:2527-2532, 2004
9. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple GA, Adams KA, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ Artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583, 2005
10. Slipman CW, Shin CH, Patel RK, Isaac Z, Huston CW, Lipetz JS, et al: Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Medicine 3:200-217, 2002