Comparison of different methods of measurement of aspirin resistance: Using the appropriate statistic [1]

European Heart Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 138-

  Lotrionte, Marzia ^a   Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe G L ^b   Agostoni, Pierfrancesco ^c   Sheiban, Imad ^b  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c MIDDELHEIM HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; ARACHIDONIC ACID; THROMBOXANE;

ASSAY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOCYTE FUNCTION; BLOOD CLOTTING PARAMETERS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESISTANCE; NOTE; THROMBOCYTE ACTIVATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; THROMBOCYTE;

ASPIRIN; CORONARY DISEASE; DRUG RESISTANCE; HUMANS; PLATELET ACTIVATION; PLATELET AGGREGATION INHIBITORS; PLATELET FUNCTION TESTS;

EID: 37849000898     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: 15229645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm505     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Lordkipanidzé M, Pharand C, Schampaert E, Turgeon J, Palisaitis DA, Diodati JG. A comparison of six major platelet function tests to determine the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1702-1708.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-310.
3. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 1983;32:307-317.
4. Ryan TP, Woodall WH. The most-cited statistical papers. J Appl Stat 2005;32:461-474.