A generalizability study of the Norwegian version of KINDLR in a sample of healthy adolescents

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 87-93

  Christophersen, Knut Andreas ^a   Helseth, Sølvi ^b   Lund, Thorleif ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Dependability; Generalizability; Psychometrics; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; NORWAY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 37749053198     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9289-y     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Crocker, L., & Algina J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
2. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H, & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioural measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
3. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.
4. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park: Sage.
5. R: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 399-407.
6. R. Berlin.
7. R. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19, 102-119.
8. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417-1432.