How exact is the performance of mediolateral episiotomy;Jak přesné je provedení mediolaterální epiziotomie

Ceska Gynekologie

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 381-385

  Stepan Jr J ^a   Kralickova M ^a   Ulmanova E ^a   Rokyta, Z ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cutting of episiotomy; Mediolateral episiotomy; Perineum

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; STANDARD;

ADULT; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 37749026115     PISSN: 12107832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andrews, V., Thakar, R., Sultan, AH. Episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors - time for reappraisal? ICS 2004, Paris, France, Abstract No. 0277, non-discussion poster, category Pregnancy.
2. Andrews, V., Thakar. R., Sultan, AH., Jones, PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? BJOG, 2005, 1 12, 8, p. 1156-1158. Erratum in: BJOG, 2005, 112, 10, p. 1459.
3. Argentine Episiotomy Collaborative Group. Routine versus selective episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 1993, 342,p.1517-1518.
4. Bek, KM., Laurberg, S. Intervention during labour: risk factors associated with complete tear of anal sphincter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1992, 71, p. 520-524.
5. Clayton, SG., Monga, A., Baker, P. Obstetric procedures. In Obstetrics by Ten Teachers. London: Arnold, 1995, p. 285-303.
6. Čech, E., Hájek, Z., Maršal, K., et al. Porodnictví. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2006.
7. de Leeuw, JW, Struijk, PC, Vierhout, ME, Wallenburg, HC. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG, 2001, 108, 4, p. 383-387.
8. Doležal, A. Porodnické operace. Praha: Grada Publishing. 2007 s. 36.
9. Eason, E., Labrecque, M., Marcoux, S., Mondor, M. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ, 2002, 66, 3, p. 326-330.
10. Eogan, M., Daly, L., O'Connell, P., O'Herlihy, C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG, 2006, 113, 2, p. 190-194.
11. Henriksen, TB., Bek, KM., Hedegaard, M., Secher, NJ. Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1992, 99, p. 950-954.
12. Kališ, V., Chaloupka, P., Turek, J., Rokyta, Z. Rizikové faktory ruptury perinea 3. (a 4.) stupně během porodu. Ces Gynek, 2005, 70, 1, s. 30-36.
13. Kališ, V., Chaloupka, P., Turek, J., Rokyta, Z. Délka hráze a porodní poranění. Ces Gynek, 2005, 70, 5, s. 355-361.
14. Kališ, V., Štěpán, J. jr., Horák, M.., et al. One Europe. How Many Definitions of Mediolateral Episiotomy? XV. Praktická urogynekologie, Mělník, 2006.
15. Nager, CW., Helliwell, JP. Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185, 2, p. 444-450.
16. Poen, AC., Felt-Bersma, RJ., Dekker, GA., et al. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. 1997, 104, 5, p. 563-566.
17. Sheiner, E., Levy, A., Walfisch, A., et al. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005, 271, 4, p. 307-310. Epub 2004 Mar 16.
18. Shihadeh, AS., Nawafleh, AN. Third degree tears and episiotomy. Saudi Med J, 2001, 22, 3, p. 272-275.
19. Thacker, SB., Banta, DH. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1983, 38, 6, p. 322-338.
20. Tincello, DG., Williams, A., Fowler, GE., et al.Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. BJOG, 2003, 110, 12, p. 1041-1044.
21. Williams Obstetrics. 21st edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2001.
22. Woolley, RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1995,50, p. 806-835.
23. Zwinger, A., et al. Porodnictví. Praha: Galén, 2004.