Effectiveness of enforcement to deter illegal angling harvest of northern pike in Alberta

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1369-1377

  Walker, Jordan R ^a   Foote, Lee ^b   Sullivan, Michael G ^b  

^a Alberta Sustainable Resource Development   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; FINFISH; HARVESTING; LAW ENFORCEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

ALBERTA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

ESOX LUCIUS;

EID: 37748999884     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/M06-011.1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Crane, B. D., S. Warner, and M. H. Kuchma. 1999. Fisheries law enforcement: assessment of deterrence. Institute for Defense Analyses, Document D-2381, Alexandria, Virginia.
2. Charles, A. T., R. L. Mazany, and M. L. Cross. 1999. The economics of illegal fishing: a behavioural model. Marine Resource Economics 14:95-110.
3. Forsyth, C. J., R. Gramling, and G. Wooddell. 1998. The game of poaching: folk crimes in southwest Louisiana. Society and Natural Resources 11:25-38.
4. Furlong, W. J. 1991. The deterrent effect of regulatory enforcement in the fishery. Land Economics 67:116-129.
5. Gigliotti, L. M., and W. W. Taylor. 1990. The effect of illegal harvest on recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 10:106-110.
6. Glass, R. D., and O. E. Maughan. 1984. Angler compliance with length limits on largemouth bass in an Oklahoma reservoir. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 4:457-459.
7. Haddon, M. 2001. Modelling and quantitative methods in fisheries. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
8. Hatcher, A., S. Jaffry, O. Thebaud, and E. Bennett. 2000. Normative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations. Land Economics 76:448-461.
9. Hirsch, A., A. E. Bottoms, E. Burney, and P. O. Wikstrom. 1999. Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: an analysis of recent research. Hart Publishing, Oxford, UK.
10. Liska, A. E., and S. F. Messner. 1999. Perspectives on crime and deviance. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
11. Ludwig, D., R. Hilborn, and C. Walters. 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260:17-36.
12. Mendes, S. M. 2004. Certainty, severity, and their relative deterrent effects: questioning the implications of the role of risk in criminal deterrence policy. Policy Studies Journal 32:59-74.
13. Mitchell, P., and E. Prepas. 1990. Atlas of Alberta lakes. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
14. Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contigent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
15. Nagin, D. S. 1998. Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Pages 51-91 in M. Tonry, editor. Crime and justice, volume 23: an annual review of research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Nelson, J. S., and M. J. Paetz. 1992. The fishes of Alberta, 2nd edition. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
17. Novinger, G. D. 1984. Observations on the use of size limits for black basses in large impoundments. Fisheries 9(4):2-6.
18. Page, K. S., and P. Radomski. 2006. Compliance with sport fishery regulations in Minnesota as related to regulation awareness. Fisheries 31:166-178.
19. Paragamian, V. L. 1982. Catch rates and harvest records under a 14.0-inch minimum length limit for largemouth bass in a new Iowa impoundment. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2:224-231.
20. Paternoster, R. 1987. The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: a review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly 4:173-217.
21. Pfohl, S. 1994. Images of deviance and social control: a sociological history, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. Pierce, R. B., and C. M. Tomcko. 1998. Angler noncompliance with slot limits for northern pike in five small Minnesota lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:720-724.
23. Pogarski, G. 2002. Identifying "deferrable" offenders: implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly 19:431-452.
24. Post, J. R., C. Mushens, A. Paul, and M. Sullivan. 2003. Assessment of alternative harvest regulations for sustaining recreational fisheries: model development and application to bull trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:22-34.
25. Post, J. R., M. Sullivan, S. Cox, N. P. Lester, C. J. Walters, E. A. Parkinson, A. J. Paul, L. Jackson, and B. J. Shuter. 2002. Canada's recreational fisheries: the invisible collapse? Fisheries 27(1):6-17.
26. Richards, L. J., and J. Maguire. 1998. Recent international agreements and the precautionary approach: new directions for fisheries management science. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1545-1552.
27. Schindler, D. W. 2001. The cumulative effects of climate warming and other human stresses on Canadian freshwaters in the new millennium. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:18-29.
28. Shuter, B., M. L. Jones, R. M. Korver, and N. P. Lester. 1998. A general, life-history-based model for regional management of fish stocks: the inland lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) fisheries of Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:2161-2177.
29. Sullivan, M.G. 2002. Illegal angling harvest of walleyes protected by length limits in Alberta. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1053-1063.
30. Sullivan, M.G. 2003. Active management of Alberta's walleyes: dilemmas of managing recovering fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:1343-1358.
31. Sutinen, J., and P. Anderson. 1985. The economics of fisheries law enforcement. Land Economics 61:387-397.
32. Sutinen, J. G., and K. Kuperan. 1999. A socioeconomic theory of regulatory compliance in fisheries. International Journal of Social Economics 26:174-193.
33. Van Vooren, A. 1991. Roles of biology and sociology in regulating bass harvest in Idaho. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-207:278-282.