Dynamics-dependent criticality in models with q absorbing states

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2002, Pages

  Lipowski, Adam ^a,b   Droz, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRANULAR MATERIALS; KINETIC THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; MIXTURES; POLYNOMIALS; RANDOM PROCESSES; RELAXATION PROCESSES;

INELASTIC HARD SPHERE MODEL (IHS); INELASTIC MIXTURES; MAXWELL MODEL; MEAN-FIELD MODEL; POLYNOMIAL EXPANSION;

ELASTICITY;

EID: 37649032473     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016106     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. H. Hinrichsen, Adv. Phys. 49, 815 (2000);J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
2. P. Grassberger, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 47, 365 (1982);
3. Z. Phys. B: Condens. MatterH.K. Janssen, 42, 151 (1981).
4. P. Grassberger, F. Krause, and T. von der Twer, J. Phys. A 17, L105 (1984);
5. I. Jensen, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3623 (1994);
6. H. Takayasu and A.Yu. Tretyakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3060 (1992).
7. K.E. Bassler and D.A. Browne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4094 (1996).
8. H.K. Janssen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2890 (1997).
9. A. Lipowski, J. Phys. A 29, L355 (1996).
10. H. Hinrichsen, Phys. Rev. E 55, 219 (1997).
11. J.L. Cardy and U.C. Täuber, J. Stat. Phys. 90, 1 (1998).
12. J. Hooyberghs, E. Carlon, and C. Vanderzande, Phys. Rev. E 64, 036124 (2001)
13. G. Ódor and N. Menyhárd, e-print cond-mat/0109399.
14. It is already known that when some asymmetry between two absorbing states is introduced then the model typically exhibits DP criticality see, e.g., H. Park and H. Park, Physica A 221, 97 (1995). Similarly, models with three asymmetric absorbing states might exhibit DP or PC criticality 49.
15. G. Ódor and N. Menyhárd, e-print cond-mat/0203419
16. S. Kwon, J. Lee, and H. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1682 (2000).
17. G. Ódor, Phys. Rev. E 63, 021113 (2001).
18. F.Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982).
19. K. Binder, in Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Berlin, Springer, 1984).
20. P. Grassberger and A. de la Torre, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 122, 373 (1979).
21. In dynamical simulations we set all but two sites of our ladder in a state 0. Two remaining sites (which are nearest neighbors) are set as 1 and 2, respectively.
22. N. Menyhárd, J. Phys. A 27, 6139 (1994).
23. Reactions (2) and (4) describe our B model only at the coarse-grained level. There are some other than processes (4) in B model that are parity-nonconserving but that are short lived and most likely irrelevant.