Statistical properties and attack tolerance of growing networks with algebraic preferential attachment

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2002, Pages

  Liu, Zonghua ^a   Lai, Ying Cheng ^a   Ye, Nong ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTRIC PHASE; LINEAR DEFECTS; PARTICLE STABILIZATION; RUBBER ELASTICITY;

COLLOIDS; CRYSTAL DEFECTS; DATA REDUCTION; DEFORMATION; ELASTIC MODULI; FREE ENERGY; GELS; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; RHEOLOGY; VISCOELASTICITY;

CHOLESTERIC LIQUID CRYSTALS;

ARTICLE;

EID: 37649032456     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.036112     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
2. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
3. D.J. Watts and S.H. Strogatz, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998).
4. P. Erdös and A. Rényi, Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5, 17 (1960);B. Bollobaás, Random Graphs (Academic, London, 1985).
5. A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, and H. Jeong, Physica A 272, 173 (1999);
6. Physica AA.-L. BarabásiR. AlbertH. Jeong281, 69 (2000).
7. P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, and F. Leyvraz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4629 (2000).
8. S.N. Dorogovtsev, J.F.F. Mendes, and A.N. Samukhin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4633 (2000);
9. S.N. DorogovtsevJ.F.F. MendesA.N. Samukhine-print cond-mat/0009090;
10. S.N. DorogovtsevJ.F.F. MendesA.N. Samukhine-print cond-mat/0011077.
11. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5234 (2000).
12. A. Vázquez, e-print cond-mat/006132; e-print
13. A. Vázquezcond-mat/0105031.
14. S.N. Dorogovtsev and J.F.F. Mendes, Phys. Rev. E 63, 025101 (2001);
15. Phys. Rev. ES.N. DorogovtsevJ.F.F. Mendes63, 056125 (2001).
16. A.-L. Barabási, H. Jeong, E. Ravasz, Z. Néda, A. Schubert, and T. Vicsek, e-print cond-mat/0104162.
17. G. Bianconi and A.-L. Barabási, Europhys. Lett. 54, 436 (2001);
18. G. BianconiA.-L. BarabásiPhys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5632 (2001).
19. G. Ergün and G.J. Rodgers, e-print cond-mat/0103423.
20. P.L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066123 (1999);
21. P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, and F. Leyvraz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4629 (2000).
22. P.L. Krapivsky, G.J. Rodgers, and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5401 (2001).
23. B. Tadić, Physica A 293, 273 (2001);
24. B. Tadiće-print cond-mat/0104029 (2001).
25. M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001);
26. Phys. Rev. EB.J. Kim, C.N. Yoon, S.K. Han, and H. Jeong, 65, 027103 (2002).
27. Another class of attachment rules that can generate networks with mixture of random and scale-free characteristics has recently been studied [Z. Liu, Y.-C. Lai, N. Ye, and P. Dasgupta, (unpublished)]. The model assumes that the attachment probability contains both a perferential and a random components, with a physical parameter controlling the relative weights between these components.
28. R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabási, Nature (London) 401, 130 (1999).
29. R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabási, Nature (London) 406, 378 (2000).
30. R. Cohen, K. Erez, D. Ben-Avraham, and S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4626 (2000);
31. Phys. Rev. Lett.R. Cohen K. Erez D. Ben-Avraham S. Havlin 86, 3682 (2001).