Quantum energy inequalities in two dimensions

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 70, Issue 12, 2004, Pages

  Fewster, Christopher J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENERGY; GEOMETRY; QUANTUM ENERGY INEQUALITY; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SPACE;

EID: 37649031628     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.127501     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. L. H. Ford, Proc. R. Soc. London A 364, 227 (1978).
2. É. É. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4922 (1997).
3. L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5496 (1996).
4. M. J. Pfenning and L. H. Ford, Classical Quantum Gravity 14, 1743 (1997).
5. É. É. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104007 (2002).
6. D. N. Vollick, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084022 (2000).
7. α to be a subordinate partition of unity.
8. a.
9. T. A. Roman, gr-qc/0409090.
10. S. A. Hayward, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D8, 373 (1999).
11. As is evident from Eq. (2), QEIs along highly accelerated trajectories give weak bounds even in Minkowski space.
12. 1, there exist smooth G with values of C arbitrarily close to this value.
13. L. H. Ford, M. J. Pfenning, and T. A. Roman, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4839 (1998).
14. M. J. Pfenning and L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3489 (1998).
15. C. J. Fewster and E. Teo, Phys. Rev. D 59, 104016 (1999).
16. C. J. Fewster, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 1897 (2000).
17. C. J. Fewster and R. Verch, Commun. Math. Phys. 225, 331 (2002).
18. M. J. Pfenning, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024009 (2002).
19. C. J. Fewster and M. J. Pfenning, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 44, 4480 (2003).
20. In order to invalidate the usual assumption, however, it would be necessary to show that all Hadamard reference states gave such an anomalous contribution.