Orientational dynamics of ferrofluids with finite magnetic anisotropy of the particles: Relaxation of magneto-birefringence in crossed fields

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2002, Pages

  Raikher, Yu L ^a,b   Stepanov, V I ^a   Bacri, J C ^b   Perzynski, R ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CONTINUOUS MEDIA MECHANICS   (Russian Federation)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIREFRINGENCE; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DISPERSIONS; FLUID DYNAMICS; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIZATION; REFRACTIVE INDEX; RELAXATION PROCESSES;

FERROFLUIDS; MACROSCOPIC BIREFRINGENCE; MAGHEMITES; MOLECULAR OPTICS;

MAGNETIC FLUIDS;

EID: 37649028507     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.021203     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J.-C. Bacri and R. Perzynski, in Complex Fluids, edited by L. Garrido (Springer, New York, 1993), p. 85.
2. Yu.L. Raikher and V.I. Stepanov, Europhys. Lett. 32, 589 (1995).
3. Yu.N. Skibin, V.V. Chekanov, and Yu.L. Raikher, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 72, 949 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 496 (1977)].
4. Yu.L. Raikher and Yu.N. Skibin, Dok. Akad. Nauk (SSSR) 302, 1088 (1988) [Sov. Phys. Dokl. 302, 746 (1988)].
5. Yu.L. Raikher and P.C. Scholten, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 74, 275 (1988).
6. E. Hasmonay, E. Dubois, S. Neveu, J.-C. Bacri, and R. Perzynski, Eur. Phys. J. B 21, 19 (2001).
7. Yu.L. Raikher and M.I. Shliomis, Adv. Chem. Phys. 87, 595 (1994).
8. V.I. Stepanov and M.I. Shliomis, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 55, 1 (1991) [Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Ser. (Engl. Transl.) 55, 1 (1991)].
9. M.I. Shliomis and V.I. Stepanov, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 122, 176 (1993);
10. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.M.I. ShliomisV.I. Stepanov122, 196 (1993).
11. M.I. Shliomis and V.I. Stepanov, Adv. Chem. Phys. 87, 1 (1994).
12. W.F. Brown, Jr., Phys. Rev. 130, 1677 (1963).
13. R. Ullman, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 1869 (1972).
14. M.A. Martsenyuk, Yu.L. Raikher, and M.I. Shliomis, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 834 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 413 (1974)].
15. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
16. W.T. Coffey, P.J. Cregg, D.S.F. Crothers, J.T. Waldron, and A.W. Weakstead, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 131, L103 (1994).
17. Yu.L. Raikher, V.I. Stepanov, A.N. Grigorenko, and P.I. Nikitin, Phys. Rev. E 56, 6400 (1997).
18. A. Aharoni, Phys. Rev. 177, 799 (1969).
19. E. Blums, A. Cebers, and M. Maiorov, Magnetic Fluids (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1997).
20. M.C. Miguel and J.M. Rubí, Phys. Rev. E 51, 2190 (1995).
21. Note that in these estimations the average volume is taken as proportional to (Formula presented) and not to (Formula presented) as in Ref. 6. We surmise that it is more realistic since (Formula presented) being the most probable diameter, does not have any other meaning. The numerical estimations for (Formula presented) (and (Formula presented) that we get are considerably greater that those given in Ref. 6 due to two reasons: (1) a different way of definition of the average volume and (2) an error in Ref. 6, due to which the value of (Formula presented) really used there was 2.5 times smaller than the one announced in the text.