Digital media

The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 145-164

  Van Dijk, Jan A G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37649021422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976077.n8     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Adoni, H. Nossek, H. The new media consumers: Media convergence and the displacement effect. European Journal of Communication Research 26 (1) (2001). 59-83.
2. ARD-Forschungsdienst. Digitales und interaktives Fernsehen: Nutzererwartungen und Akzeptanzchancen [Digital interactive television: User expectations and acceptance chances]. Media Perspektiven 8 (1999). 430-436.
3. Baldwin, T., McVoy, D., & Steinfield, C.(1996). Convergence, integrating media, information & communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Boyle, J. A politics of intellectual property: Environmentalism on the Net? Duke Law Journal 47 (1997). 78-89.
5. Cameron, A. Dissimulations: The illusion of interactivity. Millennium Film Journal 28 (1995). 33-47.
6. Castells, M.(1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. 1. The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7. Castells, M.(2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Catinat, M.(1997). The "National Information Infrastructure Initiative" in the US: Policy or non-policy?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Center for International Affairs.
9. Daft, R. L. Lengel, R. H. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (1984). 191-233.
10. Dyson, E.(1997). Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age. New York: Broadway.
11. Ferguson, D. A. Perse, E. M. The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44 (2) (2000). 155-174.
12. Flanagin, A. J. Metzger, M. Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research 27 (1) (2001). 153-177.
13. Fulk, J. Steinfield, C. Schmitz, J. Power, J. G. A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research 14 (5) (1987). 529-552.
14. Goodman, N.(1968). Languages of art. Indianapolis, IN: Hacket.
15. Haddon, L.(1999). The development of interactive games. In H. Mackay & T.O'Sullivan (Eds.), The media reader: Continuity and transformation (pp. 305-328). London: Sage.
16. Halbert, D.(1999). Intellectual property in the information age: The politics of expanding ownerships rights. Westport, CT: Quorum.
17. Heim, M.(1987). Electric language: A philosophical study of word processing. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Jensen, J.(1999). The concept of "interactivity." In J. Jensen & C. Toscan (Eds.), Interactive television: TV of the future or the future of TV? (pp. 25-66). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.
19. Jensen, J., & Toscan, C. (Eds.). (1999). Interactive television: TV of the future or the future of TV?Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.
20. Keane, J. Structural transformations of the public sphere. The Communication Review 1 (1) (1995). 1-22.
21. Kiesler, S. Siegel, J. McQuire, T. Social-psychological effects of computer-mediated information. The American Psychologist 39 (10) (1984). 1123-1143.
22. Lee, B. Lee, R. S. How and why people watch TV: Implications for the future of interactive television. Journal of Advertising Research 35 (6) (1995). 9-18.
23. Lessig, L.(1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
24. Lessig, L.(2001). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Vintage.
25. Leung, L. Wei, R. More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (2) (2000). 308-320.
26. Lievrouw, L. Nonobvious things about new media: How fast is fast? ICA Newsletter 28 (2) (2000). 6-7.
27. Mansell, R., & Wehn, U. (Eds.). (1998). Knowledge societies: Information technology for sustainable development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28. Meyrowitz, J.(1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Meyrowitz, J. Shifting worlds of strangers: Medium theory and changes in "them" versus "us." Sociological Inquiry 67 (1) (1997). 59-71.
30. Meyrowitz, J. Maguire, J. Media, place and multiculturalism. Society 30 (5) (1993). 41-48.
31. Noble, G. Discriminating between the intrinsic and instrumental domestic telephone user. Australian Journal of Communication 11 (1987). 63-85.
32. Perritt, H.(1996). Law and the information superhighway. New York: John Wiley.
33. Rice, R. E. Computer-mediated communication and media preference. Behaviour & Information Technology 17 (3) (1998). 164-174.
34. Salomon, G.(1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B.(1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
36. Social and Cultural Planning Authority of the Netherlands (SCP). (2001). Trends in de Tijd. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
37. Spears, R., & Lea, M.(1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hemp-stead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
38. Toffler, A.(1980). The third wave. London: Pan.
39. U.S. Census Bureau. (1997). Current population surveys. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40. van Dijk, J.(1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. London: Sage.
41. van Dijk, J.(2002, July). Outline of a multilevel theory of the network society. Paper presented at the 52nd annual conference of the International Communication Association, Seoul, South Korea.
42. van Dijk, J.(2004). Divides in succession: Possession, skills and use of the new media for participation. In E. Bucy & J. Newhagen (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 233-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. van Dijk, J. (in press). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. London: Sage.doi:10.4135/9781452229812 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
44. van Dijk, J. A. G. M.(1991). De Netwerk-maatschappij, Sociale aspecten van nieuwe media [The network society, social aspects of new media]. Houten, the Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
45. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. The mental challenge of the new media. Medienpsychologie, Zeitschrift für Individual- und Massenkommunikation 5 (1) (1993). 20-45.
46. van Dijk, J. A. G. M.(2001). De Netwerk-maatschappij, Sociale aspecten van nieuwe media [The network society, social aspects of new media] (4th ed.). Alphen a.d. Rijn, the Netherlands: Samsom.
47. van Dijk, J. de Vos, L. Searching for the Holy Grail: Images of interactive television. New Media and Society 3 (4) (2001). 443-465.
48. van Dijk, J. Hacker, K. The "digital divide" as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society 19 (4) (2003). 315-326.
49. Walther, J. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 19 (1) (1992). 52-90.
50. Walther, J. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23 (1) (1996). 1-43.
51. Wellman, B. Computer networks as social networks. Science 293 (2001). 2031-2034.