MRI or bone scan or both for staging of prostate cancer? [3]

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 25, Issue 36, 2007, Pages 5837-5838

  Venkitaraman, Ramachandran ^a   Sohaib, Aslam ^a   Cook, Gary ^a  

^a ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RADIOISOTOPE;

BONE METASTASIS; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BONE NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 37649020780     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.3875     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Lecouvet FE, Geukens D, Stainier A, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the axial skeleton for detecting bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: Diagnostic and cost-effectiveness and comparison with current detection strategies. J Clin Oncol 25:3281-3287, 2007
2. Jacobson AF, Stomper PC, Cronin EB, et al: Bone scans with one or two new abnormalities in cancer patients with no known metastases: Reliability of interpretation of initial correlative radiographs. Radiology 174:503-507, 1990
3. Citrin DL, Hougen C, Zweibel W, et al: The use of serial bone scans in assessing response of bone metastases to systemic treatment. Cancer 47:680-685, 1981