A role for professional development in sustainability: Linking the written curriculum to enactment

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 363-369

  Kubitskey, Beth ^a   Fishman, Barry J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULAR REFORMS; CURRICULUM DESIGNS; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL DATA; LEARNING SCIENCE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TEACHERS';

DESIGN; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CURRICULA;

EID: 37649013863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
2. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York: Macmillan.
3. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 2-14.
4. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643-658.
5. Fogleman, J., Fishman, B., & Krajcik, J. S. (in press). Sustaining innovations through lead teacher learning: A Learning Sciences perspective on supporting professional development. Teaching Education.
6. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C, Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
7. Goertz, M. E. (2001). Standards-based accountability: Horse trade or horse whip? In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. 100th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II) (pp. 39-59). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Kubitskey, B., & Fishman, B. (2005). Untangling the relationship(s) between professional development, practice, student learning and teacher learning, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
9. Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2004). Leacher learning from reform-based professional development and its impact on student learning: A case study, Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research on Science Teaching. Vancouver, Canada.
10. Lin, H.-L., & Fishman, B. (2004). Supporting the scaling of innovations: Guiding teacher adaptation of materials by making implicit structures explicit. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 617). Santa Monica, CA: Erlbaum.
11. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, B. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
13. Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165-178.
14. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1996). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402-435). New York: Macmillan.
15. Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Leuhmann, A., & Barab, S. A. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468-489.
16. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Lhousand Oaks, CA: Sage.