Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-44

  Grantham, D Wesley ^a   Ashmead, Daniel H ^a   Ricketts, Todd A ^a   Haynes, David S ^a   Labadie, Robert F ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 37649011738     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d636f     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Grantham, D. W. (1995). Spatial hearing and related phenomena. In Brian C. J. Moore (Eds.) Handbook of perception and cognition: hearing (pp. 297-345). San Diego: Academic Press.
2. Grantham, D. W., Ashmead, D. H., Ricketts, T. A., Labadie, R., & Haynes, D. (2007). Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 28, 524-541.
3. King, A. J., Kacelnik, O., Mrsic-Flogel, T. D., Schnupp, J. W., Parsons, C. H., & Moore, D. R. (2001). How plastic is spatial hearing? Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 6, 182-186.
4. Laback, B., Pok, S.-M., Baumgartner, W.-D., Deutsch, W. A., & Schmid, K. (2004). Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear and Hearing, 25, 488-500.
5. Lawson, D. T., Wilson, B. S. Z. M., van den Honert, C., Finley, C. C., Farmer, J. C. Jr., et al. (1998). Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. The American Journal of Otology, 19, 758-761.
6. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467-477.
7. Long, C. J., Eddington, D. K., Colburn, H. S., & Rabinowitz, W. M. (2003). Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1565-1574.
8. Majdak, P., Laback, B., & Baumgartner, W.-D. (2006). Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 2190-2201.
9. Nopp, P., Schleich, P., & D'Haese, P. (2004). Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 25, 205-214.
10. Ricketts, T. A., Grantham, D. W., Ashmead, D. H., Haynes, D. S., & Labadie, R. F. (2006). Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear and Hearing, 27, 763-773.
11. Schoen, F., Mueller, J., Helms, J., & Nopp, P. (2005). Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Otology & Neurotology, 26, 429-437.
12. Senn, P., Kompis, M., Vischer, M., & Haeusler, R. (2005). Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 10, 342-352.
13. Stobich, B., Zierhofer, C. M., & Hochmair, E. S. (1999). Influence of automatic gain control parameter settings on speech understanding of cochlear implant users employing the continuous interleaved sampling strategy. Ear and Hearing, 20, 104-116.
14. van Hoesel, R., Ramsden, R., & O'Driscoll, M. (2002). Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear and Hearing, 23, 137-149.
15. van Hoesel, R. J. M. (2004). Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 9, 234-246.
16. van Hoesel, R. J. M., & Tyler, R. S. (2003). Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1617-1630.
17. Yost, W. A., & Hafter, E. R. (1987). Lateralization. In Yost, W. A., & Gourevitch, G. (Eds.), Directional hearing (pp. 49-84). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Ashmead, D. H., Wall, R. S., Grantham, D. W., Ricketts, T. A., Labadie, R., & Haynes, D. (March 15-19, 2005). Auditory distance perception by unilaterally and bilaterally implanted adults. Talk presented at the 10th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Dallas.
19. Nopp, P. (March 15-19, 2005). Fine structure coding and channel interaction compensation. Talk presented at the 10th symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Dallas.
20. Patrick, J., & van den Honert, C. (March 15-19, 2005). Coding strategies utilizing fine-time structure stimuli. Talk presented at the 10th symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Dallas.