Adaptation of the Bridgman anvil cell to liquid pressure mediums

Review of Scientific Instruments

Volumn 78, Issue 12, 2007, Pages

  Ruetschi A S ^a   Jaccard, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROSTATIC PRESSING; ORGANIC CONDUCTORS; SOLID SOLUTIONS; STEATITE; SUPERCONDUCTING CABLES; WIRE;

BRIDGMAN ANVIL CELL; LIQUID PRESSURE; RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS;

PRESSURE CONTROL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; TRANSDUCER;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLUTIONS; SPECIMEN HANDLING; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 37649010404     PISSN: 00346748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2818788     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Thomasson, Y. Dumont, J. C. Griveau, and C. Ayache, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 1514 (1997).
2. J. Thomasson, Y. Okayama, I. Sheikin, J.-P. Brison, and D. Braithwaite, Solid State Commun. 106, 637 (1998).
3. A. Demuer, D. Jaccard, I. Sheikin, S. Raymond, B. Salce, J. Thomasson, D. Braithwaite, and J. Flouquet, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 9335 (2001).
4. A. T. Holmes, D. Jaccard, and K. Miyake, Phys. Rev. B 69, 024508 (2004).
5. L. G. Khvostantsev, V. N. Slesarev, and V. V. Brazhkin, High Press. Res. 24, 371 (2004).
6. T. Nakanishi, N. Takeshita, and N. Môri, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 1828 (2002).
7. H. Fukazawa, N. Yamatoji, Y. Kohori, C. Terakura, N. Takeshita, Y. Tokura, and H. Takagi, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 015106 (2007).
8. E. Colombier and D. Braithwaite, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 093903 (2007).
9. P. W. Bridgman, Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 81, 165 (1952).
10. J. Wittig, Z. Phys. 195, 215 (1966).
11. F. P. Bundy, in Modern Very High Pressure Techniques, edited by, R. H. Wentorf, (Butterworth, London, 1962).
12. D. Jaccard, E. Vargoz, K. Alami-Yadri, and H. Wilhelm, Rev. High Pressure Sci. Technol. 7, 412 (1998).
13. The transition width is defined as the temperature range where the resistivity is between 10% and 90% of the residual resistivity. The calibration of Tc against p from Bireckoven and Wittig is used [B. Bireckoven and J. Wittig, J. Phys. E 21, 841 (1988)].
14. T. Itou, K. Kanoda, K. Murata, T. Matsumoto, K. Hiraki, and T. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 216408 (2004).
15. R. Lortz, personal communication (2003). Here, the pressure calibration for Pb manometers from Thomasson is used [J. Thomasson, C. Ayache, I. L. Spain, and M. Villedieu, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5933 (1990)]. This calibration was recently confirmed up to 10 GPa under optimal hydrostatic conditions by Deemyad [S. Deemyad, Ph.D. thesis, Washington University, 2004].
16. R. Lortz, personal communication (2003).
17. Here, the pressure calibration for Pb manometers from Thomasson is used [J. Thomasson, C. Ayache, I. L. Spain, and M. Villedieu, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5933 (1990)]
18. This calibration was recently confirmed up to 10 GPa under optimal hydrostatic conditions by Deemyad [S. Deemyad, Ph.D. thesis, Washington University, 2004].
19. This calibration was recently confirmed up to 10 GPa under optimal hydrostatic conditions by Deemyad [S. Deemyad, Ph.D. thesis, Washington University, 2004].
20. H. Wilhelm, D. Jaccard, R. Duprat, C. Bourbonnais, D. Jerome, J. Moser, C. Carcel, and J. M. Fabre, Eur. Phys. J. B 21, 175 (2001).
21. N. Toyota, M. Lang, and J. Müller, Low-Dimensional Molecular Metals (Springer, Berlin, 2007).