Efficient estimation of hidden state dynamics from spike trains

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 227-234

  Danóczy, Márton G ^a   Hahnloser, Richard H R ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENT ESTIMATION; HIDDEN STATE; MARKOV MODEL; MULTIPLE NEURONS; NON-PARAMETRIC ALGORITHM; SPIKE TRAIN; STATE DYNAMICS; STATE SEQUENCES; TIME COURSE; TWO-STATE MODEL; UNDERLYING NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; NEURONS;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 37649003473     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Z. Nádasdy, H. Hirase, A. Czurkó, J. Csicsvári, and G. Buzsáki. Replay and time compression of recurring spike sequences in the hippocampus. J Neurosci, 19(21):9497-9507, Nov 1999.
2. K. G. Thompson, D. P. Hanes, N. P. Bichot, and J. D. Schall. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. J Neurophysiol, 76(6):4040-4055, Dec 1996.
3. R. Cossart, D. Aronov, and R. Yuste. Attractor dynamics of network UP states in the neocortex. Nature, 423(6937):283-288, May 2003.
4. E. N. Brown, R. Barbieri, V. Ventura, R. E. Kass, and L. M. Frank. The time-rescaling theorem and its application to neural spike train data analysis. Neur Comp, 14(2):325-346, Feb 2002.
5. J. Deppisch, K. Pawelzik, and T. Geisel. Uncovering the synchronization dynamics from correlated neuronal activity quantifies assembly formation. Biol Cybern, 71(5):387-399, 1994.
6. A. M. Fraser and A. Dimitriadis. Forecasting probability densities by using hidden Markov models with mixed states. In Weigend and Gershenfeld, editors, Time Series Prediction: Forecasting the Future and Understanding the Past, pages 265-82. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
7. A. Berchtold. The double chain Markov model. Comm Stat Theor Meths, 28:2569-2589, 1999.
8. L. R. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE, 77(2):257-286, Feb 1989.
9. R. H. R. Hahnloser, A. A. Kozhevnikov, and M. S. Fee. An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird. Nature, 419(6902):65-70, Sep 2002.
10. A. S. Dave and D. Margoliash. Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science, 290(5492):812-816, Oct 2000.
11. D. J. Thomson and A. D. Chave. Jackknifed error estimates for spectra, coherences, and transfer functions. In Simon Haykin, editor, Advances in Spectrum Analysis and Array Processing, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 58-113. Prentice Hall, 1991.
12. A. Leonardo and M. S. Fee. Ensemble coding of vocal control in birdsong. J Neurosci, 25(3):652-661, Jan 2005.
13. G. Radons, J. D. Becker, B. Dülfer, and J. Krüger. Analysis, classification, and coding of multielectrode spike trains with hidden Markov models. Biol Cybern, 71(4):359-373, 1994.
14. I. Gat, N. Tishby, and M. Abeles. Hidden Markov modelling of simultaneously recorded cells in the associative cortex of behaving monkeys. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 8(3):297-322, 1997.