Synthesis of a stimulus-responsive processing device and its application to a nucleocytoplasmic shuttle peptide

ChemBioChem

Volumn 8, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 1929-1931

  Shigenaga, Akira ^a   Tsuji, Daisuke ^a,b   Nishioka, Naomi ^a   Tsuda, Shugo ^a   Itoh, Kohji ^a,b   Otaka, Akira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hydrolysis; Peptides; Photoreaction; Stimulus responsive; Trimethyl lock

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BENZYL DERIVATIVE; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DI TERT BUTYL AZODICARBOXYLATE; HYDROXYL GROUP; O NITROBENZYL; PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; PYRROLIDINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PHOTOREACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEOMICS; SYNTHESIS; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; FLUORESCENT DYES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PEPTIDES; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 37549060038     PISSN: 14394227     EISSN: 14397633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200700442     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. a) M. Toebes, M. Coccoris, A. Bins, B. Rodenko, R. Gomez, N. J. Nieuwkoop, W. v. d. Kasteele, G. F. Rimmelzwaan, J. B. A. G. Haanen, T. N. M. Schumacher, Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 246;
2. b) L. L. Parker, J. W. Kurutz, S. B. H. Kent, S. J. Kron, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6470;
3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6322;
4. c) Y. Sohma, Y. Kiso, ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 1549;
5. d) J.-P. Pellois, T. W. Muir, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5859;
6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5713;
7. e) S. Dos Santos, A. Chandravarkar, B. Mandal, R. Mimna, K. Murat, L. Saucede, P. Tella, G. Tuchscherer, M. Mutter, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11 888;
8. f) M. Endo, K. Nakayama, Y. Kaida, T. Majima, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 5761;
9. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5643;
10. g) C. J. Bosques, B. Imperiali, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7530;
11. h) P. M. England, H. A. Lester, N. Davidson, D. A. Dougherty, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11025;
12. i) C. Renner, L. Moroder, ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 868.
13. K. L. Amsberry, R. T. Borchardt, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5867.
14. M. Caswell, G. L. Schmir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4815;
15. S. Milstien, L. A. Cohen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 9158;
16. R. T. Borchardt, L. A. Cohen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 9166.
17. [7] that is adjacent to the photo-responsive residue with a Gly enhanced the reaction rate, presumably due to the reduced steric hindrance of Gly compared to Tyr (half-life: 5 min).
18. S. Futaki, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005, 57, 547.
19. A. Chestukhin, L. Litovchick, K. Rudich, J. A. DeCaprio, Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 453.
20. D. Engelsma, R. Bernad, J. Calafat, M. Fornerod, EMBO J. 2004, 23, 3643.
21. The retention time of processing product 17 was identical to that of an authentic sample, which was synthesized separately.
22. a) Generation of singlet oxygen by FTC sensitization: S. Beck, T. Sakurai, B. K. Eustace, G. Beste, R. Schier, F. Rudert, D. G. Jay, Proteomics 2002, 2, 247;
23. b) Reaction of singlet oxygen with thiocarbonyl group: N. Ramnath, V. Ramesh, V. Ramamurthy, J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 214.
24. Y. Yashiroda, M. Yoshida, Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 741.