Sufficiency, justice, and the pursuit of health extension

Rejuvenation Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 513-519

  Farrelly, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; JUSTICE; LIFESPAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENESCENCE; STANDARD; WELLBEING;

AGING; HUMANS; LONGEVITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 37549053590     PISSN: 15491684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/rej.2007.0557     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. de Grey A. Life extension, human rights, and the rational refinement of repugnance. J Med Ethics 2005;31: 659-663.
2. Frankfurt H. Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics 1987;98:21-43; Crisp R. Equality, priority, and compassion. Ethics 2003;113:745-763.
3. Casal P. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics 2007; 117:296-326.
4. Resnick D. The moral significance of the therapy-enhancement distinction. Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics 2000;9:365-377.
5. Hekimi S. How genetic analysis tests theories of animal aging. Nat Genet 2006; 38:985-991,986.
6. Seer Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2002. Available online at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2002/ results_merged/topic_lifetime_risk.pdf
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004, p. 234. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/hus/hus04.pdf
8. Greaves M. Darwinian medicine: a case for cancer. Nature Rev Cancer 2007;7:213-221.
9. Olshansky SJ, Perry D, Miller RA, Butler RN. The longevity dividend. The Scientist 2006;20:28-36.
10. Broome J. Discounting the future. Philosophy Public Affairs 1994;23:128-156.
11. De Grey A. Three self-evident life-extension truths. Rej Res 2004;7:165-167.