ACOG Committee Opinion No. 395: Surgery and patient choice

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 243-247

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; JUSTICE; MEDICAL ETHICS; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 37549036650     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291581.16747.24     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Code of professional ethics of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2008. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from_home/acogcode.pdf. Retrieved January 2, 2008.
2. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000.
3. The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110;1203-8.
4. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physicianpatient relationship. JAMA 1992;267:2221-6.
5. Mahowald MB. On the treatment of myopia: feminist standpoint theory and bioethics. In: Wolf S, editor. Feminism and bioethics: beyond reproduction. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 95-115.
6. Myers ER, Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby T, Couchman G, Matchar DB, McCrory DC. Management of uterine leiomyomata: what do we really know? Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:8-17.
7. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1501-4.
8. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:946-50.
9. Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1386-97.
10. Bewley S, Cockburn J. Responding to fear of childbirth. Lancet 2002;359:2128-9.
11. Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Kononen T, Halmesmaki E. A randomized controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:820-6.
12. Morrison J, MacKenzie IZ. Cesarean section on demand. Semin Perinatol 2003;27:20-33.
13. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:302-5.
14. Maternal decision making, ethics, and the law. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 321. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1127-37.