Joint 3D inversion of marine CSEM and MT data

SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 574-578

  Mackie, Randall ^a   Watts, M Donald ^a   Rodi, William ^b  

^a Geosystem srl

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549022318     PISSN: 10523812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2792486     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Constable, S., and C. J. Weiss, 2006, Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling: Geophysics, 71, no. 2, G43-G51.
2. Cox, C. S., S. C. Constable, A. D. Chave, and S. C. Webb, 1986, Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding of the oceanic lithosphere: Nature, 320, 52-54.
3. Eidesmo, T., S. Ellingsrud, L. M. MacGregor, S. Constable, M. C. Sinha, S. Johanson, F. N. Kong, and H. Westerdahl, 2002, Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct indentification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas: First Break, 20, 144-152.
4. Ellingsrud, S., T. Eidesmo, S. Johansen, M. C. Sinha, L. M. MacGregor, and S. Constable, 2002, Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers by seabed logging (SBL): Results from a cruise offshore Angola: The Leading Edge, 21, 972-982.
5. Ellis, R. G., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1994, The pole-pole 3-D DC-resistivity inverse problem: A conjugate gradient approach: Geophysical Journal International, 119, 187-194.
6. Farquharson, C. G., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1996, Approximate sensitivities for the electromagnetic inverse problem: Geophysical Journal International, 126, 235-252.
7. Fletcher, R., and C. M. Reeves, 1959, Function minimization by conjugate gradients: The Computer Journal, 7, 149-154.
8. MacGregor, L., and S. Sinha, 2000, Use of marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding for sub-basalt exploration: Geophysics, 146, 217-236.
9. Mackie, R. L., J. T. Smith, and T. R. Madden, 1994, Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equations: The magnetotelluric example: Radio Science, 29, 923-935.
10. Polak, E., 1971, Computational methods in optimization: A unified approach: Academic Press.
11. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, 1992, Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: The art of scientific computing, 2nd Edition: Cambridge University Press.
12. Rodi, W., and R. L. Mackie, 2001, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion: Geophysics, 66, 174-187.
13. Tikhonov, A. N., and V. Y. Arsenin, 1977, Solutions of ill-posed problems: V. H. Winston and Sons.
14. Weaver, J. T., A. K. Agarwal, and X. H. Pu, 1995, Recent developments in three-dimensional finite difference modelling of the magnetic field in geo-electromagnetic induction, in M. Oristaglio and B. Spies, eds, International Symposium on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics.