NMR and the uncertainty principle: How to and how not to interpret homogeneous line broadening and pulse nonselectivity. I. The fundamentals

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A: Bridging Education and Research

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 309-348

  Szántay Jr , Csaba ^a  

^a GEDEON RICHTER LTD   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Excitation profile; Fourier transform; Harmonic phasor; NMR lineshape; Uncertainty principle

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549021873     PISSN: 15466086     EISSN: 15525023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20098     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Allchin D. 2001. Error types. Perspect Sci 9:38-59.
2. Allchin D. 2003. Scientific myth-conceptions. Sci Educ 87:329-351.
3. Hoult DI. 1989. The magnetic resonance myth of radio waves. Concepts Magn Reson 1:1-5.
4. Neuhaus D, Williamson MP. 2000. The Nuclear Overhauser Effect in Structural and Conformational Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley. pp 7-8.
5. Paniagua JC. 2006. On the physical interpretation of density operators at the atomic scale: a thorough analysis of some simple cases. Concepts Magn Reson 28A:384-409.
6. Ziessow D. 1990. NMR spectral analysis and modelling. Concepts Magn Reson 2:13-32.
7. Angelidis PA. 1996. Spectrum estimation and the Fourier transform in imaging and spectroscopy. Concepts Magn Reson 8:339-381.