The proper place of values in the delivery of medicine

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 21-22

  Savulescu, Julian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; CONSCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; NOTE; PATIENT; PATIENT ABANDONMENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSCIENCE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PATIENTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIANS; REFUSAL TO TREAT; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 37549020358     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701709990     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Curlin, F. A., R. E. Lawrence, M. H. Chin, and J. D. Lantos. 2007. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. New England Journal of Medicine 356(6): 593-600.
2. Lawrence, R. E., and F. A. Curlin. 2007. Clash of definitions: Controversies about conscience in medicine. American Journal of Bioethics 7(12): 10-14.
3. Manasse, H. R. 2005. Conscientious objection and the pharmacist. Science 308:1558-1559.
4. Plato. 320 BCE. Euthyphro (trans. B. Jowett). Available at: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/euthyfro.html (accessed September 21, 2007).
5. Savulescu, J. 1995. Rational non-interventional paternalism: Why doctors ought to make judgements of what is best for their patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 21:327-31.
6. Savulescu, J. 1997. Liberal rationalism and medical decision-making. Bioethics 11: 115-129.
7. Savulescu, J. 2006. Autonomy, the good life and controversial choices. In The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics, ed. R. Rhodes, 17-37. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
8. Savulescu, J., and R.W. Momeyer. 1997. Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs? Journal of Medical Ethics 23(5): 282-288.