Primary and secondary normal stress differences of a magnetorheological fluid (MRF) up to magnetic flux densities of 1 T

Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 148, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 47-56

  Laun, Hans Martin ^a   Gabriel, Claus ^a   Schmidt, Gerhard ^a  

^a BASF SE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cone plate geometry; Lateral force in concentric cylinder; Magnetorheological fluid (MRF); Normal forces; Plate plate geometry; Ratio of first and second normal stress difference

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC FLUX; RHEOLOGY; RHEOMETERS; SHEAR STRESS;

MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FLUID; NORMAL STRESS DIFFERENCES; PLATE-PLATE MAGNETO-RHEOMETER; RADIAL FLUX DENSITY;

MAGNETIC FLUIDS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC FLUIDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; RHEOLOGY; RHEOMETERS; SHEAR STRESS;

EID: 37449020188     PISSN: 03770257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Z.P. Schulman, W.I. Kordonski. Magnetorheological Effect (Russian). Publisher "Nauka i Tekhnika", Minsk, 1982.
2. Bossis G., and Lemaire E. Yield stresses in magnetic suspensions. J. Rheol. 35 (1991) 1345-1354
3. Felt D.M., Hagenbuchle M., and Liu J. Rheology of a magnetorheological fluid. J. Int. Mater. Syst. Struct. 7 (1996) 589-593
4. Ginder J.M., Davis L.C., and Elie L.D. Rheology of magnetorheological fluids: models and measurement. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10 (1996) 3293-3303
5. Kormann C., Laun H.M., and Richter H.J. MR fluids with nano-sized magnetic particles. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10 (1996) 3167-3172
6. Laun H.M., Kormann C., and Willenbacher N. Rheometry on magnetorheological (MR) fluids. I. Steady shear flow in stationary magnetic fields. Rheol. Acta 35 (1996) 417-432
7. Rabinow J. The magnetic fluid clutch. AIEE Trans. 67 (1948) 1308-1315
8. Jolly M.R., Bender J.W., and Carlson J.D. Properties and application of commercial magnetorheological fluids. Proceedings of the SPIE Fifth International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials. San Diego, CA (1996) 1998
9. Klingenberg D.J. Magnetorheology: Applications and Challenges. AIChE J. 47 (2001) 246-249
10. Kröger M., Ilg P., and Hess s. Magnetoviscous model fluids. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) 1403-1423
11. See H., and Tanner R. Shear rate dependence of the normal force of a magnetorheological suspension. Rheol. Acta 42 (2003) 166-170
12. Ilg P., Kröger M., and Hess S. Magnetoviscosity of simidilute ferrofluids and the role of dipolar interactions: comparison of molecular simulations and dynamic mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005) 031205
13. Meissner J., Garbella R.W., and Hostettler J. Measuring normal stress differences in polymer melt shear flow. J. Rheol. 33 (1989) 843-864
14. Schweizer T. Measurement of the first and second normal stress differences in a polystyrene melt with a cone and partitioned plate tool. Rheol. Acta 41 (2002) 337-344
15. Mall-Gleissle S., Gleissle W., McKinley G.H., and Buggisch H. The normal stress behavior of suspensions with viscoelastic matrix fluids. Rheol. Acta 41 (2002) 61-76
16. Laun H.M. Normal stresses in extremely shear thickening polymer dispersions. JNNFM 54 (1994) 87-108
17. Odenbach S., Rylewicz T., and Rath H. Investigation of the Weissenberg effect in suspensions of magnetic nanoparticles. Phys. Fluids 11 (1999) 2901-2905
18. De Vicente J., Gońzaöes-Caballero F., Bossis G., and Volkova O. Normals force study in concentrated carbonyl iron magnetorheological suspensions. J. Rheol. 46 (2002) 1295-1303
19. Bird R.B., Armstron R.C., and Hassager O. Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids: Fluid Mechanics. 2nd ed. vol. 1 (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York
20. H.M. Laun, G. Schmidt, 2007. FEM Simulations to improve the quality of radial flux density profiles in a magneto-rheometer. Appl. Rheol., in preparation.
21. Laeuger J., Wollny K., Stettin H., and Huck S. A new device for the full rheological characterization of magneto-rheological fluids. Proceedings of the ERMR2004. Beijing, China (2005) 370-376