Does maternal environmental condition during reproductive development induce genotypic selection in Picea abies?

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 109-109

  Besnard, Guillaume ^a,b   Acheré, Virginie ^b   Jeandroz, Sylvain ^b   Johnsen, Øystein ^c   Faivre Rampant, Patricia ^b   Baumann, Rüdiger ^d   Müller Starck, Gerhard ^d   Skrøppa, Torre ^c   Favre, Jean Michel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Parental effect; Picea abies; Post zygotic selection; Segregation distortion

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CONIFEROUS TREE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GENOTYPE; NATURAL SELECTION; PARENTAL CARE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTION; SEED PRODUCTION;

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 37449005970     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2007081     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Acheré V., Faivre Rampant P., Jeandroz S., Besnard G., Markussen T., Aragones A., Fladung M., Ritter E., Favre J.M., A saturated consensus linkage map of Picea abies including AFLP, SSR, STS, 5S rDNA and morphological markers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 108 (2004) 1602-1613.
2. Agrawal A.A., Herbivory and maternal effects: Mechanisms and consequences of transgenerational induced plant resistance, Ecology 83 (2002) 3408-3415.
3. Archaux F., Wolters V., Impact of summer drought on forest biodiversity: what do we know? Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 645-652.
4. Bernasconi G., Ashman T.L., Birkhead T.R., Bishop J.D.D., Grossniklaus U., Kubli E., Marshall D.L., Schmid B., Skogsmyr I., Snook R.R., Taylor D., Till-Bottraud I., Ward P.I., Zeh D.W., Hellriegel B., Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage, Science 303 (2004) 971-975.
5. Besnard G., Acheré V., Faivre Rampant P., Favre J.M., Jeandroz S., A set of cross-species amplifying microsatellite markers developed from DNA-sequence databanks in Picea (Pinaceae), Mol. Ecol. Notes 3 (2003) 380-383.
6. Bréda N., Huc R., Granier A., Dreyer E., Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences, Ann. For. Sci. 63. (2006) 625-644.
7. Buckler E.S. IV, Phelps-Durr T.L., Buckler C.S.K., Dawe R.K., Doebley J.F., Holtsford T.P., Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome, Genetics 153 (1999) 415-426.
8. Chagné D., Brown G., Lalanne C., Madur D., Plot D., Neale D., Plomion C., Comparative and QTL mapping between maritime and loblolly pines, Mol. Breed. 12 (2003) 185-195.
9. Chakraverti A., Lasher L.K., Reefer J.E., A maximum likelihood method for estimating genome length using genetic linkage data, Genetics 128 (1991) 175-182.
10. Collignon A.M., Van de Sype H., Favre J.M., Geographical variation in random amplified polymorphic DNA and quantitative traits in Norway spruce, Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 266-282.
11. Falconer D.S., Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd ed., Longman Scientific and Technical, John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1989, 438 pp.
12. Galloway L.F., Maternal effects provide phenotypic adaptation to local environmental conditions, New Phytol. 166 (2005) 93-100.
13. Grattapaglia D., Sederoff R., Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudo-testcross: mapping strategy and RAPD markers, Genetics 137 (1994) 1121-1137.
14. Grivet D., Jeandroz S., Favre J.M., Nad1 b/c intron polymorphism reveals maternal inheritance of the mitochondrial genome in Picea abies, Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 (1999) 346-349.
15. Hall M.C.,Willis J.H., Transmission ratio distortion in intraspecific hybrids of Mimulus guttatus: implications for genomic divergence, Genetics 170 (2005) 375-386.
16. Hamrick J.L., Response of forest trees to global environmental changes, For. Ecol. Manage. 197 (2004) 323-335.
17. Hodgetts R.B., Aleksiuk M.A., Brown A., Clarke C., Macdonald E., Nadeem S., Khasa D., Development of microsatellite markers for white spruce (Picea glauca) and related species, Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 (2001)1252-1258.
18. Hulbert S., Ilott T., Legg E.J., Lincoln S., Lander E., Michelmore R., Genetic analysis of the fungus Bremia lactucae, using restriction length polymorphism, Genetics 120 (1988) 947-958.
19. Jaramillo-Correa J.P., Beaulieu J., Bousquet J., Contrasting evolutionary forces driving population structure at expressed sequence tag polymorphisms, allozymes and quantitative traits in white spruce, Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 2729-2740.
20. Johnsen ∅., Skrøppa T., Junttila O., Dæhlen O.G., Influence of the female flowering environment on autumn frost-hardiness of Picea abies progenies, Theor. Appl. Genet. 92 (1996) 797-802.
21. Johnsen ∅., Dæhlen O.G., ∅streng G., Skrøppa T. Daylength and temperature during seed production interactively affect adaptive performance of Picea abies progenies, New Phytol. 168 (2005) 589-596.
22. Johnsen ∅., Fossdal C.G., Nagy N., Mølmann J., Dæhlen O.G., Skrøppa T., Climatic adaptation in Picea abies progenies is affected by the temperature during zygotic embryogenesis and seed maturation, Plant Cell Environ. 28 (2005) 1090-1102.
23. Karhu A., Hurme P., Karjalainen M., Karvonen P., Karkkainen K., Neale D., Savolainen O., Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits of conifers? Theor Appl Genet 93 (1996) 215-221.
24. Karl T.R., Trenberth K.E., Modern global climate change, Science 302 (2003) 1719-1723.
25. Kosambi D.D., The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 12 (1944) 172-175.
26. Kremer A., Genetic diversity and phenotypic variability of forest trees, Genet. Sel. Evol. 26 (1994) S105-S123.
27. Lacy E.P.,What is an adaptive environmentally induced parental effect? in: Mousseau T.A., Fox C.W. (Eds.), Maternal effects as adaptations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
28. Lenormand T., Dutheil J., Recombination difference between sexes: a role for haploid selection, PLoS Biol. 3 (2005) 396-403.
29. Maron J.L., Vila M., Bommarco R., Elmendorf S., Beardsley P., Rapid evolution of an invasive plant, Ecol. Monogr. 74 (2004) 261-280.
30. Owens J.N., Blake M.D., Forest tree seed production, Information Report PI-X-53 Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Chalk River, Ontario, 1985, 161 p.
31. Owens J.N., Johnsen ∅., Dæhlen O.G., Skrøppa T., Potential effects of temperature on early reproductive development and progeny performance in Picea abies (L.) Karst., Scand. J. Forest Res. 16 (2001) 221-237.
32. Paglia G.P., Olivieri A.M., Morgante M., Towards secondgeneration STS (sequence-tagged sites) linkage maps in conifers: a genetic map of Norway spruce (Picea abies K.), Mol. Gen. Genet. 258 (1998) 466-478.
33. Pardo-Manuel de Villena F., de la Casa-Esperón E., Sapienza C. Natural selection and the function of genome imprinting: beyond the silenced minority, Trends Genet. 16 (2000) 573-579.
34. Pasonen H.L., Pulkkinen P., Kärkkäinen K., Genotype-environment interactions in pollen competitive ability in an anemophilous tree, Betula pendula Roth., Theor. Appl. Genet. 105 (2002) 465-473.
35. Perry D.J., Bousquet J., Sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers of arbitrary genes: the utility of black spruce-derived STS primers in other conifers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 97 (1998) 735-743.
36. Pfeiffer A., Olivieri A.M., Morgante M., Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K.), Genome 40 (1997) 411-419.
37. Rajora O.P., Rahman M.H., Dayanandan S., Mosseler A., Isolation, characterization, inheritance and linkage of microsatellite DNA markers in white spruce (Picea glauca) and their usefulness in other spruce species, Mol. Gen. Genet. 264 (2001) 871-882.
38. Rapp R.A., Wendel J.F., Epigenetics and plant evolution, New Phytol. 168 (2005) 81-91.
39. Sarvas R., Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Picea abies, Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 67 (1968) 1-84.
40. Saxe H., Cannell M.G.R., Johnsen ∅., RyanM.G.,Vourlitis G., Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming, New Phytol. 149 (2001) 369-399.
41. Schmidtling R.C., Hipkins V., The after-effects of reproductive environment in shortleaf pine, Forestry 77 (2004) 287-295.
42. Schubert R., Sperisen C., Müller-Starck G., La Scala S., Ernst D., Sandermann H., Häger K.P., The cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene structure in Picea abies (L.) Karst.: genomic sequences, southern hybridization, genetic analysis and phylogenetic relationships, Trees Struct. Funct.12 (1998) 453-463.
43. Schubert R., Müller-Starck G., Riegel R., Development of ESTPCR markers and monitoring their intrapopulational genetic variation in Picea abies (L.) Karst., Theor. Appl. Genet. 103 (2001) 1223-1231.
44. Scotti I., Magni F., Fink R., Powell W., Binelli G., Hedley P.E., Microsatellite repeats are not randomly distributed within Norway spruce (Picea abies K.) expressed sequences, Genome 43 (2000) 41-46.
45. Scotti I., Magni F., Paglia G.P., Morgante M., Trinucleotide microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies): their features and the development of molecular markers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 106 (2002) 46-50.
46. Scotti I., Paglia G.P.,Magni F., Morgante M., Efficient development of dinucleotide microsatellite markers in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) through dot-blot selection, Theor. Appl. Genet. 104 (2002) 1035-1041.
47. Scotti I., Burelli A., Cattonaro F., Chagné D., Fuller J., Hedley P.E., Jansson G., Lalanne C., Madur D., Neale D., Plomion C., Powell W., Troggio M., Morgante M., Analysis of the distribution of marker classes in a genetic linkage map: a case study in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.), Tree Genet. Genomes 1 (2005) 93-102.
48. Skrøppa T., Kohmann K., Adaptation to local conditions after one generation in Norway spruce, For. Genet. 4 (1997) 165-180.
49. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., Biometry, 4th ed., WH Freeman, New York, 1998.
50. Taylor D.R., Ingvarsson P.K., Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals, Genetica 117 (2003) 27-35.
51. Temesgen B., Brown G.R., Harry D.E., Kinlaw C.S., Sewell M.M., Neale D.B., Genetic mapping of expressed sequence tag polymorphism (ESTP) markers in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 (2001) 664-675.
52. Trontin J.F., Grandemange C., Favre J.M., Two highly divergent 5S rDNA unit size classes occur in composite tandem array in European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) and Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carr.), Genome 42 (1999) 837-848.
53. Van Ooijen J.W., Voorrips R.E., JoinMap 3.0, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps, Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2001, and website: http://www.plant.wageningen-ur.nl.
54. Vogl C., Xu S., Multiple point mapping of viability and segregation distorting loci using molecular marker, Genetics 155 (2000) 1439-1447.
55. Webber J., Ott P., Owens J., Binder W., Elevated temperature during reproductive devlopment affects traits and progeny performance in Picea glauca x engelmannii complex, Tree Physiol. 25 (2005) 1219-1227.
56. Young W.P., Schupp J.M., Keim P.D.N.A., methylation and AFLP distribution in the soybean genome, Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 (1999) 785-790.