Diagnosis of small-bowel pathology using paired capsule endoscopy with two different devices: A randomized study

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1041-1045

  Hartmann, D ^a   Eickhoff, A ^a   Damian, U ^a   Riemann, J F ^a  

^a Department of Gastroenterology   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIODYSPLASIA; ARTICLE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE TUMOR; INTESTINE ULCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUCOSAL BLEEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMALL INTESTINE HEMORRHAGE; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPES; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL DISEASES; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; INTESTINE, SMALL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 37449002481     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966943     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2407-2418
2. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R et al. Meta-analysis: capsule enteroscopy vs. conventional modalities in diagnosis of small bowel diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 595-604
3. Ell C, Remke S, May A et al. The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 685-689
4. Hartmann D, Schmidt H, Bolz G et al. A prospective two-center study comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with intraoperative enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 826-832
5. Hartmann D, Schilling D, Bolz G et al. Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Z Gastroenterol 2003; 41: 377-382
6. Rey JF, Gay G, Kruse A, Lambert R, ESGE Guidelines Committee. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline for video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 656-658
7. Rey JF, Ladas S, Alhassani A, Kuznetsov K, ESGE Guidelines Committee. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Video capsule endoscopy: update to guidelines (May 2006). Endoscopy 2006; 38: 1047-1053
8. Delvaux M, Friedman S, Keuchel M et al. Structured terminology for capsule endoscopy: results of retrospective testing and validation in 766 small-bowel investigations. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 945-950
9. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 576-584
10. Cave D, Fleischer C, Gostout C et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of the EndoCapsule: Olympus Inc and the PillCam SB: GivenImaging in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB125
11. Rondonotti E, Spada C, Cave D et al. Video capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1624-1631
12. Sturniolo GC, Di Leo V, Vettorato MG et al. Small bowel exploration by wireless capsule endoscopy: results from 314 procedures. Am J Med 2006; 119: 341-347
13. Bar-Meir S, Eliakim R, Nadler M et al. Second capsule endoscopy for patients with severe iron deficiency anemia. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 711-713
14. Jones BH, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK et al. Yield of repeat wireless video capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1058-1064