The influence of insects and hummingbirds on the geographical variation of the flower phenotype in Mimulus luteus

Ecography

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 812-818

  Medel, Rodrigo ^a   Valiente, Angela ^a   Botto Mahan, Carezza ^a   Carvallo, Gastón ^a   Pérez, Fernanda ^a   Pohl, Nélida ^b   Navarro, Luis ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; DIVERGENCE; FLOWER; FOOD SELECTION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HERB; INSECT; NECTAR; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATOR; TAXONOMY;

CHILE; SOUTH AMERICA;

APOIDEA; HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; MIMULUS (ANGIOSPERM); MIMULUS LUTEUS; PHRYMACEAE; TROCHILIDAE;

EID: 37349127460     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05175.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aigner, P. A. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness trade-offs: when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95 : 177 184.
2. Armbruster, W. S. 1985. Patterns of character divergence and the evolution of reproductive ecotypes in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae) Evolution 39 : 733 752.
3. Beardsley, P. M. Olmstead, R. G. 2002. Redefining Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma Am. J. Bot. 89 : 1093 1102.
4. Beardsley, P. M. et al. 2003. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination Evolution 57 : 1397 1410.
5. Beardsley, P. M. et al. 2004. Patterns of evolution in western North American Mimulus (Phrymaceae) Am. J. Bot. 91 : 474 489.
6. Bené, F. 1941. Experiments on the color preference of black-chinned hummingbirds Condor 43 : 237 323.
7. Bleiweiss, R. 2001. Mimicry on the QT(L): genetics of speciation in Mimulus Evolution 55 : 1706 1709.
8. Bolwig, N. 1954. The role of scent as a nectar guide for honeybees on flowers and an observation on the effects of colour on recruits Br. J. Anim. Behav. 2 : 81 83.
9. Botto-Mahan, C. et al. 2004. Nectar guide fluctuating asymmetry does not relate to female fitness in Mimulus luteus Plant Ecol. 174 : 347 352.
10. Bradshaw, H. D. Schemske, D. W. 2003. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers Nature 426 : 176 178.
11. Bradshaw, H. D. et al. 1995. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus) Nature 376 : 762 765.
12. Bradshaw, H. D. et al. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus) Genetics 149 : 367 382.
13. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in a male and female pollination success Evolution 43 : 318 334.
14. Campbell, D. R. et al. 1996. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata Ecology 77 : 1463 1472.
15. Campbell, D. R. et al. 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybird zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales Am. Nat. 149 : 295 315.
16. Caruso, C. M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata Evolution 54 : 1546 1557.
17. Chittka, L. Waser, N. M. 1997. Why red flowers are not invisible to bees Isr. J. Plant Sci. 45 : 169 183.
18. Darwin, C. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects. John Murray.
19. Dudash, M. R. Carr, D. E. 1998. Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems Nature 393 : 682 684.
20. Endress, P. K. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution Int. J. Plant Sci. 160 : S3 S23.
21. Faegri, K. van der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press.
22. Fenster, C. B. et al. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 : 375 403.
23. Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot Polemonium viscosum Evolution 43 : 882 890.
24. Gomulkiewicz, R. et al. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution Am. Nat. 156 : 156 174.
25. Herrera, C. M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35 : 95 125.
26. Herrera, C. M. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawkmoth-pollinated violet Ecol. Monogr. 63 : 251 275.
27. Herrera, C. M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb Ecology 81 : 2170 2176.
28. Herrera, C. M. et al. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism-and antagonism-related traits Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 16823 16828.
29. Horvitz, C. C. Schemske, D. W. 1990. Spatiotemporal variation in insect mutualists of a Neotropical herb Ecology 71 : 1085 1097.
30. Johnson, S. D. 1997. Pollination ecotypes of Satyrium hallackii (Orchidaceae) in South Africa Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 123 : 225 235.
31. Macnair, M. R. 1983. The genetic control of copper tolerance in the yellow monkey flower, Mimulus guttatus Heredity 50 : 283 293.
32. Medel, R. et al. 2003. Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean monkey flower, Mimulus luteus Ecology 84 : 1721 1732.
33. Miller, R. S. Miller, R. E. 1971. Feeding activity and color preference of ruby-throated hummingbirds Condor 73 : 309 313.
34. Nagy, E. S. 1997. Selection for native characters in hybrids between two locally adapted plant subspecies Evolution 51 : 1469 1480.
35. Nuismer, S. L. et al. 2003. Coevolution in temporally variable environments Am. Nat. 162 : 195 204.
36. Pohl, N. et al. 2006. Non-additive effects of flower damage and hummingbird pollination on the fecundity of Mimulus luteus Oecologia 149 : 648 655.
37. Price, M. V. et al. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study Ecology 86 : 2106 2116.
38. Ramsey, J. et al. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkey-flowers Mimulus lewisii and Mimulus cardinalis (Phrymaceae) Evolution 57 : 1520 1534.
39. Robertson, J. L. Wyatt, R. 1990. Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliaris Evolution 44 : 121 133.
40. Rudgers, J. A. Strauss, S. Y. 2004. A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 271 : 2481 2488.
41. Schemske, D. W. Bradshaw, H. D. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 11910 11915.
42. Schiestl, F. P. et al. 2003. The chemistry of sexual deception in an orchid-wasp pollination system Science 302 : 437 438.
43. Sokal, R. R. Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman.
44. Stebbins, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. I: pollination mechanisms Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1 : 307 326.
45. Sutherland, S. D. Vickery, R. K. 1993. On the relative importance of floral color, shape, and nectar rewards in attracting pollinators to Mimulus Great Basin Nat. 53 : 107 117.
46. Thompson, J. N. 1988. Variation in interspecific interactions Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19 : 65 87.
47. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. Univ. of Chicago Press.
48. Vickery, R. K. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus Evol. Biol. 11 : 405 507.
49. Vickery, R. K. 1990. Pollination experiments in the Mimulus cardinalis-M. lewisii complex Great Basin Nat. 50 : 155 159.
50. Vickery, R. K. 1992. Pollinator preferences for yellow, orange, and flowers of Mimulus verbenaceus and M. cardinalis Great Basin Nat. 52 : 145 148.
51. Vickery, R. K. 1995. Speciation in Mimulus, or, can a flower color mutant lead to species divergence? Great Basin Nat. 55 : 177 180.
52. von Bohlen, C. V. 1995. The genus Mimulus L. (Scrophulariaceae) in Chile Gayana Bot. 52 : 7 28.
53. Waser, N. M. 1983. The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence Real, L. A. Pollination biology. Academic Press 241 285.
54. Waser, N. M. Price, M. V. 1985. The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with a montane herb Oecologia 67 : 121 126.
55. Waser, N. M. Campbell, D. R. 2004. Ecological speciation in flowering plants Dieckmann, U. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge Univ. Press 264 277.
56. Waser, N. M. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems and why it matters Ecology 77 : 1043 1060.
57. Willis, J. H. 1993. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on fitness components in Mimulus guttatus Evolution 47 : 864 876.