Shock Wave Lithotripsy Success for Renal Stones Based on Patient and Stone Computed Tomography Characteristics

Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1043-1046

  Weld, Kyle J ^a   Montiglio, Claudio ^a   Morris, Michael S ^a   Bush, Anneke C ^a   Cespedes, R Duane ^a  

^a WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEMOGRAPHY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; HUMAN; KIDNEY CALCIFICATION; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37349125536     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.074     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Sampaio F.J., D'Anunciacao A.L., and Silva E.C. Comparative follow-up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum-pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: preliminary report and proposed study design. J Endourol 11 (1997) 157-161
2. Gupta N.P., Singh D.V., Hemal A.K., et al. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 163 (2000) 24-27
3. Elbahnasy A.M., Clayman R.V., Shalhav A.L., et al. Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: Impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 12 (1998) 113-119
4. Sakkas G.B.P. Electroconductive lithotripsy (ECL), for lower renal pole lithiasis: results with reference in spatial anatomy. J Endourol 14 Suppl 1 (2000) A83
5. Pacik D.H.T. Prediction of the effect in lower calyx nephrolithiasis SWL treatment. J Endourol 14 Suppl 1 (2000) A84
6. Gupta N.P., Ansari M.S., Kesarvani P., et al. Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. BJU Int 95 (2005) 1285-1288
7. Pareek G., Armenakas N.A., Panagopoulos G., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units. Urology 65 (2005) 33-36
8. Pareek G., Hedican S.P., Lee F.T., et al. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66 (2005) 941-944
9. Nakada S.Y., Hoff D.G., Attai S., et al. Determination of stone composition by non-contrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55 (2000) 816-819
10. Mobley T.B., Myers D.A., Grine W.B., et al. Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: Treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 149 (1993) 1419-1424
11. Psihramis K.E., Jewett M.A.S., Bonbardier C., et al. Lithostar extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 1,000 patients. J Urol 147 (1992) 1006-1009
12. Lingeman J.E., Coury T.A., Newman D.M., et al. Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138 (1987) 485-490
13. Cass A.S. Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 153 (1995) 588-592
14. Drach G.W., Dretler S., Fair W., et al. Report of the United States Cooperative Study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135 (1986) 1127-1133
15. Mays N., Challah S., Patel S., et al. Clinical comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi. BMJ 297 (1988) 253-258
16. Rigatti P., Francesca F., Montorsi F., et al. Extracorporeal lithotripsy and combined surgical procedures in the treatment of renoureteral stone disease: our experience with 2,955 patients. World J Surg 13 (1989) 765-774
17. El-Damanhoury H.J., Scharfe T., Ruth J., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi: experience in treatment of 3,278 patients using the Siemens Lithostar and Lithostar Plus. J Urol 145 (1991) 484-488
18. Politis G., and Griffith D. ESWL: stone-free rates based upon stone size and location. World J Surg 5 (1987) 255-258
19. Rassweiler J., Gumpinger R., Bub P., et al. Wolf Peizolith 2200 versus the modified Dornier HM3: efficacy and range of indications. Eur Urol 16 (1989) 1-6
20. Tan E.C., Tung K.H., and Foo K.T. Comparative studies of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy by Dornier HM3, EDAP LT 01 and sonolith 2000 devices. J Urol 146 (1991) 294-297
21. Johnson D.B., Lowry P.S., Schluckebier J.A., et al. University of Wisconsin experience using the Doli S lithotriptor. Urology 62 (2003) 410-414
22. Hoag C.C., Taylor W.N., and Rowley V.A. The efficacy of the Dornier Doli S lithotripter for renal stones. Can J Urol 13 (2006) 3358-3363
23. Chacko J., Moore M., Sankey N., et al. Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?. J Urol 175 (2006) 1370-1373
24. Yilmaz E., Batislam E., Basar M., et al. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study. Urol 66 (2006) 1160-1164
25. Abe T., Akakura K., Kawaguchi M., et al. Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution. J Endourol 19 (2005) 768-773
26. Streem S.B., Yost A., and Mascha E. Clinical implications of clinically insignificant stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 155 (1996) 1186-1190
27. El-Nahas A.R., El-Assmy A.M., Madbouly K., et al. Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. J Endourol 20 (2006) 870-874