Neural regions essential for reading and spelling of words and pseudowords

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 481-492

  Philipose, Lisa E ^a   Gottesman, Rebecca F ^a   Newhart, Melissa ^a   Kleinman, Jonathan T ^a   Herskovits, Edward H ^b   Pawlak, Mikolaj A ^b   Marsh, Elisabeth B ^a   Davis, Cameron ^a   Heidler Gary, Jennifer ^a   Hillis, Argye E ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN REGION; BRODMANN AREA 37; BRODMANN AREA 40; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROANATOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SPELLING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROKE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; READING; STROKE;

EID: 37349125265     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.21182     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Hillis AE, Rapp BS. Cognitive and neural substrates of written language comprehension and production. In: Gazzaniga M, ed. The new cognitive neurosciences. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
2. Allport DA, Funneil E. Components of the mental lexicon Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1981;295:397-410.
3. Coltheart M, Funnell E, eds. Reading and writing: one lexicor. or two? London: Academic Press, 1987.
4. Behrmann M, Bub D. Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: dua, routes, single lexicon. Cogn Neuropsychol 1992:209-251.
5. Chialant D, Caramazza A. Perceptual and lexical factors in a case of letter-by-letter reading. Cogn Neuropsychol 1998;15 167-201.
6. Dejerine J. 'Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie, suiv d'autopsie.' Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances et Mémoires de la Société de Biologie. Ninth series. 1891;3:197-201.
7. Dejerine J. 'Contribution à l'étude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des différentes variétés de cécité verbale.' Memoires Societe Biologique 1892;4:61-90.
8. Benson DF, Geschwind N. The Alexias. 4 vols. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1969.
9. Lhermitte E, Beauvois MF. A visual-speech disconnexion syndrome: report of a case with optic aphasia, agnosic alexia and colour agnosia. Brain 1973;96:695-714.
10. Marsh EB, Hillis AE. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying reading and naming: evidence from letter-by-letter reading and optic aphasia. Neurocase 2005;11:318-325.
11. Beauvois M-F, Derouesne J. Lexical or orthographic agraphia. Brain 1981;104:21-49.
12. Benson DF. Aphasia, alexia, and agraphia. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1979.
13. Hillis AE, Rapp BC, Caramazza A. When a rose is a rose in speaking but a tulip in writing. Cortex 1999;35:337-356.
14. Hillis AE, Chang S, Breese E. The crucial role of the posterior frontal regions in modality specific components of the spelling process. Neurocase 2004;10:175-187.
15. Heim S, Opitz B, Muller K, Friederici AD. Phonological processing during language production: fMRI evidence for a shared production-comprehension nerwork. Cogn Brain Res 2003;16: 285-296.
16. Beauvois MF, Derouesne J. Phonological alexia: three dissociations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:115-124.
17. Funnell E. Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia. Br J Psychol 1983;74:159-180.
18. Bub D, Cancelliere A, Kertesz A. Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling to sound in a non-semantic reader. In: Patterson KE, Marshall JC, Coltheart M, eds. Surface dyslexia. London: LEA, 1985.
19. Patterson KE, Marshall JC, Coltheart M. Surface dyslexia. London: LEA, 1985.
20. Plaut D, Shallice T. Deep dyslexia: a case study in connectionist neuropsychology. Cogn Neuropsychol 1993;10:377-500.
21. Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol Rev 1989;96: 523-568.
22. Love T, Swinney D, Wong E, Buxton R. Perfusion imaging and stroke: a more sensitive measure of the brain bases of cognitive deficits. Aphasiology 2002;16:873-883.
23. Goodman RA, Caramazza A. Phonologically plausible errors: implications for a model of the phoneme-grapheme conversion mechanism in the spelling process. In Augst G, ed. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Graphemics and Orthography.
24. Henry ML, Beeson PM, Stark AJ, Rapcsak SZ. The role of left perisylvian cortical regions in spelling. Brain Lang 2007;100: 44-52.
25. Hillis AE, Wiryk RJ, Tuffiash E, et al. Hypoperfusion of Wernicke's area predicts severity of semantic deficit in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 2001;50:561-566.
26. Beeson PM, Rapcsak SZ, Plante E, et al. The neural substrates of writing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Aphasiology 2003;17:647-665.
27. Rapp BC, Hseih L. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the cognitive components of the spelling process. Paper presented at: Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting; 2001; San Francisco.
28. Patterson KE, Kay J. Letter-by-letter reading: psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Q J Exp Psychol 1982; 34A:411-441.
29. Rapcsak SZ, Rubens AB, Laguna JF. From letters to words: procedures for word recognition in letter-by-letter reading. Brain Lang 1990;38:504-514.
30. Rapcsak SZ, Beeson PM. The role of left posterior inferior temporal cortex in spelling. Neurology 2004;62:2221-2229.
31. Cohen L, Dehaene S. Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage 2004;22: 466-476.
32. Cohen L, Dehaene S, Naccache L, et al. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split brain patients. Brain 2000;123:291-307.
33. Cohen L, Henry C, Dehaene S, et al. The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:1768-1780.
34. Cohen L, Jobert A, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S. Distinct unimodal and multimodal regions for word processing in the left temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2004;4:1256-1270.
35. Cohen L, Lehericy S, Chochon F, et al. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain 2002;125:1054-1069.
36. Cohen L, Martinaud O, Lemer C, et al. Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cereb Cortex 2003;13: 1313-1333.
37. Puce A, Allison T, Asgari M, et al. Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 1996;16: 5205-5215.
38. Price CJ, Wise RJ, Warburton EA, et al. Hearing and saying: the functional neuroanatomy of auditory word processing. Brain 1996;119:919-931.
39. Joubert S, Beauregard M, Walter N, et al. Neural correlates of lexical and sublexical processes in reading. Brain Lang 2004;89: 9-20.
40. Pugh KR, Mencl WE, Jenner A, et al. Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. J Commun Disord 2001;34: 479-492.
41. Mesulam MM. From sensation to cognition. Brain 1998;121: 1031-1052.
42. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006;129:1371-1384.
43. Price CJ, Crinion J. The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasie stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2005;18:429-434.
44. Jobard G, Crivello F, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 2003;20:693-712.
45. Mechelli A, Gorno-Tempini ML, Price CJ. Neuroimaging studies of word and pseudoword reading: consistencies, inconsistencies, and limitations. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:260-271.
46. Chatterjee A. A madness to the methods in cognitive neuroscience? J Cogn Neurosci 2005;17:847-849.
47. Fellows LK, Heberlein AS, Morales DA, et al. Method matters: an empirical study of impact in cognitive neuroscience. J Cogn Neurosci 2005;17:850-858.
48. Price CJ, Mummery CJ, Moore CJ, et al. Delineating necessary and sufficient neural systems with functional imaging studies of neuropsychological patients. J Cogn Neurosci 1999;11:371-382..
49. Damasio H, Damasio A. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
50. Kabani NJ, Collins DL, Evans AC. A 3D neuroanatomical atlas. In: Evans AC, ed. Fourth Internarional Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, 1998. Quebec, Canada: Academic Press.
51. Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson W, Stamatakis EA. Dissociating neuro-cognitive processes: voxel-based correlational methodology. Neuropsychologia 2005;43:771-778.
52. Sobesky J, Zaro Weber O, Lehnhardt FG, et al. Which time-to-peak threshold best identifies penumbral flow? A comparison of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2004;35: 2843-2847.
53. Jenkinson M, Smith SM. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001; 5:143-156.
54. Hillis AE, Wiryk RJ, Barker PB, et al. Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain 2002;125:1094-1104.
55. Herskovits E. An architecture for a brain-image database. Methods Inf Med 2000;39:291-297.
56. Buchel C, Price CJ, Friston K. A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway. Nature 1998;394:274-277.
57. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, et al. The role of the "visual word form area" in reading. Neuroimage 2004;24:548-549.
58. Price CJ, Devlin JT. The myth of the visual word form area. Neuroimage 2003;19:473-481.
59. Price CJ, Thierry G, Griffiths T. Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it? Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:271-276.
60. Corina DP, San Jose Roberrson L, Guillemin A, et al. Language lateralization in a bimanual language. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:718-730.
61. Law I, Kannao I, Fujita H, et al. Left supramarginal/angular gyri activation during reading of syllabogram in the Japanese language. J Neurolinguist 1991;6:243-251.
62. Price CJ. The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production. Trends Cogn Sci 1998;2:281-288.
63. Booth JR, Burmann DD, Meyer JR, et al. Relation berween brain activation and lexical performance. Hum Brain Mapp 2003;19:155-169.
64. Xiao Z, Zhang JX, Wang X, et al. Differential activity in left inferior frontal gyrus for pseudowords and real words: an event related fMRI study on auditory lexical decision. Hum Brain Mapp 2005;25:212-221.
65. Demonet JF. A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks. Influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. Brain 1994; 117:671-682.
66. Demonet JF, Chollet F, Ramsay S, et al. The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain 1992;115:1753-1768.
67. Zatorre RJ, Evans AC, Meyer E, Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 1992;256:846-849.
68. Zatorre RJ, Meyer E, Gjedde A, Evans AC. PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: review, replication, and reanalysis. Cereb Cortex 1996;6:21-30.
69. Burton MW, Small SL, Blumstein SE. The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 2000;12:679-690.
70. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for ourput: evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit. Brain Lang 1991;40:106-144.
71. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. Converging evidence for the interaction of semantic and phonological information in accessing lexical information for spoken output. Cogn Neuropsychol 1995; 12:187-227.
72. Hillis AE, Kane A, Tuffiash E, et al. Neural substrates of the cognitive processes underlying spelling: evidence from MR diffusion and perfusion imaging. Aphasiology 2002;16: 425-438.