Requirements for QoS-based web service description and discovery

Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 467-472

  Kritikos, Kyriakos ^a   Plexousakis, Dimitris ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SEMANTIC WEB;

BUSINESS APPLICATIONS; FUNCTIONALLY-EQUIVALENT WS; WS DESCRIPTION MODELS (WSDM);

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 37349122424     PISSN: 07303157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2007.181     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. F. et. al. Web Service Modelling Ontology. ESSIWSMO working group, http://www.wsmo.org, 2004.
2. L. Jin, V. Machiraju, and A. Sahai. Analysis on service level agreement of web services. Technical Report HPL-2002-180, Software Technology Laboratories, HP Laboratories, 2002.
3. A. Keller and H. Ludwig. The wsla framework: Specifying and monitoring service level agreements for web services. Technical Report RC22456 (W0205-171), IBM, 2002.
4. K. Kritikos and D. Plexousakis. Semantic qos metric matching. In ECOWS, pages 265-274. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
5. O. Martín-Díaz, A. R. Cortés, D. Benavides, A. Durán, and M. Toro. A quality-aware approach to web services procurement. In B. Benatallah and M.-C. Shan, editors, Technologies for E-Services (TES), volume 2819 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 42-53. Springer, 2003.
6. E. M. Maximilien and M. P. Singh. Conceptual model of web service reputation. SIGMOD Rec., 31(4):36-41, 2002.
7. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. R. Payne, and K. P. Sycara. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In ISWC '02: Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web, pages 333-347, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
8. A. A. Patil, S. A. Oundhakar, A. P. Sheth, and K. Verma. Meteor-s web service annotation framework. In S. I. Feldman, M. Uretsky, M. Najork, and C. E. Wills, editors, WWW, pages 553-562. ACM, 2004.
9. S. Ran. A model for web services discovery with qos. SIGecom Exch., 4(1):1-10, 2003.
10. F. Rossi. Preference reasoning. In P. van Beek, editor, CP, volume 3709 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 9-12. Springer, 2005.
11. K. Sivashanmugam, K. Verma, A. P. Sheth, and J. A. Miller. Adding semantics to web services standards. In Zhang [18], pages 395-401.
12. K. Sycara et al. OWL-S 1.0 Release. OWL-S Coalition, http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/, 2003.
13. M. Tian, A. Gramm, M. Nabulsi, H. Ritter, J. Schiller, and T. Voigt. Qos integration in web services. Gesellschaft fur Informatik DWS 2003, Doktoranden workshop Technologien und Anwendungen von XML (Ph.D. students workshop Technologies and Applications of XML), October 2003.
14. V. Tosic, B. Esfandiari, B. Pagurek, and K. Patel. On requirements for ontologies in management of web services. In CAiSE '02/ WES '02: Revised Papers from the International Workshop on Web Services, E-Business, and the Semantic Web, pages 237-247, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
15. V. Tosic, B. Pagurek, and K. Patel. Wsol - a language for the formal specification of classes of service for web services. In Zhang [18], pages 375-381.
16. P. Van Hentenryck and V. Saraswat. Strategic directions in constraint programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4):701-726, 1996.
17. T. Yu and K.-J. Lin. Service selection algorithms for composing complex services with multiple qos constraints. In B. Benatallah, F. Casati, and P. Traverso, editors, ICSOC, volume 3826 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 130-143. Springer, 2005.
18. L.-J. Zhang, editor. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Services, ICWS '03, June 23 - 26, 2003, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. CSREA Press, 2003.
19. C. Zhou, L.-T. Chia, and B.-S. Lee. Daml-qos ontology for web services. In ICWS '04: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), page 472, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.