Status of Schoenoplectus hallii (Hall's bulrush) (Cyperaceae) in the United States

Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 457-481

  McKenzie, Paul M ^a   Smith, S Galen ^b   Smith, Marian ^c  

^a US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYPERACEAE; SCHOENOPLECTUS HALLII;

EID: 37349115983     PISSN: 19345259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. BARRETT, S.C.H. and J.R.K. KOHN. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: D.A. Falk and K. Holsinger eds. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. Pp. 3-31.
2. BASKIN, C.C., J.M. BASKIN, and E.W. CHESTER. 2000. Effect of flooding on the annual dormancy cycle and on germination of seeds of the summer annual Schoenoplectus purshianus (Cyperaceae). Aquatic Bot. 67:109-116.
3. BASKIN, C.C., J.M. BASKIN, E.W. CHESTER and M. SMITH. 2003. Ethylene as a possible cue for seed germination of Schoenoplectus hallii (Cyperaceae), a rare summer annual of occasionally flooded sites. Amer. J. of Bot. 90:620-627.
4. BEATTY, B.L., W.F. JENNINGS, and R.C. RAWLINSON. 2004. Schoenoplectus hallii (Gray) S.G. Sm. (Hall's bulrush): a technical conservation assessment. Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rock Mountain Region, Species Conservation Report. Peer review administered by Center for Plant Conservation, St. Louis, Missouri.
5. BEETLE, A.A. 1947. Scirpus. N. Amer. Flora 18(8):481-504.
6. BOWLES, M.L., M.M. DEMAURO, N. PAVLOVIC, and R.D. HIEBERT. 1990. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on endangered and threatened plants at the Indiana Dunes National Seashore. Nat. Areas J. 10:187-200.
7. BRODOWICZ, W. 1990. Noteworthy collections. Scirpus hallii A. Gray. Michigan Botanist 29:31.
8. BROWNING, J. 1992. Hypogynous bristles and scales in basal florets in amphicarpous Schoenoplectus species (Cyperaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 12:171-175.
9. BRUHL, J.J. 1994. Amphicarpy in the Cyperacae, with novel variation in the wetland sedge Eleocharis caespitosissma. Austral. J. Bot. 42:441-448.
10. CABIN, R.J., R.J. MITCHELL, and D.L. MITCHELL. 1998. Do surface plant and soil seed bank populations differ genetically? A multipopulation study of the desert mustard Lesquerella fendleri (Btasicaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85:1098-1109.
11. CHESTER, E.W. 1988. An unusual habitat type for three rare Kentucky plants. Abstract. Trans. Kentucky Acad. Sci. 49(102):56.
12. CORRELL, D.S. and M.C. JOHNSTON. 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation, Renner.
13. CRISPIN, S. and M. PENSKAR. 1990. Scirpus hallii Gray (Hall's bulrush). Unpubl. abstract, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, endangered species manual.
14. DAI, A., I.Y. FUNG, and A.D. DEL GENIO. 1996. Surface observed global land precipitation variations during 1900-1988. J. Climate 10:2943-2962.
15. DAVIDSON, R.S. 1959. The vascular flora of southeastern Iowa: Univ. Iowa Stud. Nat. Hist. 20(2):1-102.
16. DEVLAMING, V. and V.W. PROCTOR. 1968. Dispersal of aquatic organisms: viability of seeds recovered from the droppings of captive killdeer and mallard ducks. Amer. J. Bot. 55:20-26.
17. DUNN, D.B. and D.F. KNAUER. 1975. Plant introductions by waterfowl to Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Missouri. Trans. Missouri. Acad. Sci. 9:27-28.
18. ELIASSON, L. and K. PALEN. 1972. Effect of light on the response of pea seedling roots to 2,4-D. Physiol. Pl. 26:206-209.
19. ELSTRAND, N.C. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77-93.
20. ELLSTRAND, N. and D. ELAM. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:217-242.
21. FELBER, F. 1991. Establishment of a tetraploid cytotype in a diploid population: effect of the relative fitness of the cytotypes. J. Evol. Biol. 4:195-204.
22. FLORA OF NORTH AMERICA EDITORIAL COMMITTEE, eds. 2002. Vol. 2. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. FRANKEL, O.H. and M.E. SOULE. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
24. GLEASON, H.A. AND A. CRONQUIST. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, ed. 2. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.
25. GRAY, A. 1863. Manual of botany of the northern United States. Third edition. New York.
26. GREAT PLAINS FLORA ASSOCIATION. 1977. Atlas of the flora of the Great Plains; R.L. McGregor, Coordinator; T.M. Barkley, ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
27. GREAT PLAINS FLORA ASSOCIATION. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains; R.L. McGregor, Coordinator; T.M. Barkley, R.E. Brooks, and E.K. Schofield, eds. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.
28. GULDNER, L.F. 1960. The vascular plants of Scott and Muscatine counties. Davenport Mus. Publ. Bot. No. 1.
29. HAMILTON, M.B. 1994. Ex situ conservation of wild plant species: time to reassess the genetic assumptions and implications of seed banks. Conserv. Biol. 8:39-49.
30. HANNAH, L., C.F. MIDGLEY, and D. MILLER. 2002. Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11:485-495.
31. HANSEN, J.E. 1989.The greenhouse effect: Impacts on current global temperature and regional precipitation. In: The challenge of global warming. Island Press, Washington, DC. Pp. 35-43.
32. HARRINGTON, H.D. 1954. Manual of the plants of Colorado. Sage Books, Denver, CO.
33. HARRISON, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42:73-88.
34. HERKERT, J.R. and J.E. EBINGER. 2002. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 1. Plants. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board, Springfield.
35. HICKMAN, J.C. 1993. Ed. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
36. HOLTSFORD, T.P. and N.C. ELLSTRAND. 1991. Inbreeding effects in Clarkia tembloriensis populations with different natural outcrossing rates. Evolution 44:2031-2046.
37. ILLINOIS ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION BOARD. 2007.2006 endangered and threatened species list. Springfield, http:// www.dnr.state.il.us/espb/datelist.htm. Accessed Jan 2007.
38. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2007a. Illinois Endangered Species Board.Wildlife- 520 Illinois Compiled Statute (ILCS) 10/Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act. Springfield. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID= 1730&ChapAct=520%26nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B10%2F&ChapterlD= 43&ChapterName=WILDLIFE&ActName= Illinois+Endangered+Species+Protection+Act%2E. Accessed Apr 2007.
39. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2007b. Consultation requirements associated with the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act. Springfield. http://dnr.state.il.us/orep/ nrrc/brief.htm. Accessed Apr 2007.
40. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2007. Endangered, threatened, rare and extirpated plants of Indiana. Indianapolis. http://www.in.gov/dnr/naturepr/endanger/etrplants.pdf. Accessed Jan 2007.
41. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2007. Threatened and endangered species. DesMonies. http://www.iowadnr. com/other/files/chapter77.pdf. Accessed Jan 2007.
42. KANTUD, H.A. 1996. The alkali (Scirpus maritimus L.) and saltmarsh (S. robustus Pursh) bulrushes: a literature review. National Biological Service, Information andTechnology Report 6. Jamestown, North Dakota. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center web database. Available at http://npwrclib.cr.usgs.gov/starweb/pubsearch/servlet.starweb. Accessed Sep 2006.
43. KEENEY, D. and M. MULLER. 2006. Water use by ethanol plants: potential challenges. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
44. KENTUCKY STATE NATURE PRESERVES COMMISSION. 2007. Kentucky rare plant database. http://eppcapps.ky.gov/ nprareplants/details.aspx?species=Schoenoplectus%20hallii. Accessed Jan 2007.
45. KLEISS, B.A., R.H. COUPE, G.J. GONTHIER, and B.G. JUSTUS. 2000. Water quality in the Mississippi embayment, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and Kentucky from 1995-1998. Circular 1208, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
46. KNUE, J. 1997. Nebraskaland magazine wildlife viewing guide. Nebraskaland Mag. 75(1):1-96. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln.
47. KOYAMA, T. 1962. The genus Scirpus Linn. Some North American aphylloid species. Canad. J. Bot. 40:913-937.
48. KOZLOWSKI, T.T. and S. SASAKI. 1968. Germination and morphology of red pine seeds and seedlings in contact with EPTC, CDEC, CDAA, 2,4-D and Picloram. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 193:655-662.
49. LEVIN, D.A. 1990. The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. Amer. Nat. 135:563-572.
50. LEVIN, D.A., J. FRANCISCO-ORTEGA, and R.K. JANSEN. 1996. Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv. Biol. 10:10-16.
51. MAGRATH, L.K. 2002. Schoenoplectus hallii and S. saximontanus. 2000 Wichita Mountain Wildlife Refuge survey. Oklahoma Native Pl. Rec. 2(1):54-62.
52. MARTIN, A.C., H.S. ZIM, and A.L. NELSON. 1951. American wildlife & plants: A guide to wildlife food habits. Dover Publ., New York.
53. MASCHINSKI, J., J.E. BAGGS, P.F. QUINTANA- ASCENCIO, and E.S. MENGES. 2006. Using population viability analysis to predict the effects of climate change on the extinction risk of an endangered limestone endemic shrub, Arizona cliffrose. Conserv. Biol. 20:218-228.
54. MCCLAIN, W.E., R.D. MCCLAIN, and J.E. EBINGER. 1997. Flora of temporary sand ponds in Cass and Mason counties, Illinois. Castanea 62:65-73.
55. MCCUE, K.A. and T.P. HOLTSFORD. 1998. Seed bank influences on genetic diversity in the rare annual Clarkiaspringvil- lensis (Onagraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85:30-36.
56. MCKENZIE, P.M. 1998. Hall's bulrush (Schoenoplectus hallii) status assessment. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Columbia, MO.
57. MENGES, E.S. 1992. Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In: Fiedler and Jain, eds. Conservation Biology Chapman and Hall, New York. Pp. 253-275.
58. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2007. Wildlife Division- endangered and threatened species. Rule 99.1028. Plants. Lansing. http://www.state.mi.us/orr/emi/admincode.asp? AdminCode=Single&Admin_Num=29901021&Dpt=NR&RngHigh. Accessed Apr 2007.
59. MICHIGAN LEGISLATURE. 2007. Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act 451 of 1994. Part 365. Endangered species protection. Sections 324.36501-36507. Lansing, http://www.legislature.mi.gov/ (S(jppkk3m3hgmug345wl1pedq5))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectname= mcl-451-1994-iii-1-endangered-species-365. Accessed Apr 2007.
60. MICHIGAN NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY. 2007. Michigan's special plants. Lansing, http://web4.msue.msu.edu/mnfi/data/ specialplants.cfm. Accessed Apr 2007.
61. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. 2007. Animal Legal & Historical Web Center. Statutes and Laws. East Lansing, MI. http://www.animallaw.info/statutes/stusmi324_365.htm. Accessed Apr 2007.
62. MISSOURI NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2006a. Missouri species and communities of conservation concern database. Missouri Department of Conservation. Jefferson City.
63. MISSOURI NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2006b. Missouri species and communities of conservation concern checklist. Missouri Department of Conservation. Jefferson City.
64. MOHLENBROCK, R.H. 1976.The illustrated flora of Illinois: Sedges-Cyperus to Scleria. Southern Illinois University Pres., Carbondale and Edwardsville.
65. MOHLENBROCK, R.H. and D.M. LADD. 1978. Distribution of Illinois vascular plants. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
66. MURATA, M., T. TSUCHIYA, and E.E. ROOS. 1982. Chromosomal damage induced by artificial seed aging in barley. II. Types of chromosomal aberrations at first mitosis. Bot. Gaz. 1413:111-116.
67. MURATA, M., T. TSUCHIYA, and E.E. ROOS. 1984. Chromosomal damage induced by artificial seed aging in barley behavior of chromosomal aberrations during plant growth. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67:161-170.
68. MUSARRAT, J. and A. HASEEB. 2000. Agrichemicals as antagonist of lectin-mediated Rhizobium-legume symbiosis: paradigms and prospects. Current Sci. 78:793-797.
69. NARTVARANANT, P.S. HAMILL, J. LEONARDI, A.W. WHILEY AND S. SUBHADRABANDHU. 2004. Seasonal effects of foliar application of phosphonate on phosphonate translocation, in vitro pollen viability and pollen germination in Hass avocado (Persea americana Mill.). J. Hort. Sei. Biotech. 79:91-96.
70. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. 1995. Science and the endangered species act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
71. NATURESERVE. 2006. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 5.0 NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available at: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. Accessed Sep 2006.
72. NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION. 2007a. The Natural Legacy Project: a blueprint for conserving wildlife and their habitats. Appendix 8: Tier 1 At-Risk Species. Lincoln. http://www.ngpcstate.ne. us/wildlife/programs/legacy/pdfs/appendix8.pdf. Accessed Jan 2007.
73. NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION. 2007b. The Natural Legacy Project: a blueprint for conserving wildlife and their habitats. Lincoln. http://www.ngpc.state.ne.us/wildlife/programs/legacy/about. asp. Accessed Jan 2007.
74. NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION. 2007c. The Natural Legacy Project: a blueprint for conserving wildlife and their habitats. Chapter 3: Methodology: identifying ecological communities, at-risk species and biologically unique landscapes. Lincoln. http://www.ngpc.state.ne. us/wildlife/programs/legacy/pdfs/chpater3.pdf. Accessed Jan 2007.
75. NEWMAN, D. and D. PILSON. 1997. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution 51:354-362.
76. O'KENNON, R.J. and C. MCLEMORE. 2004. Schoenoplectus hallii (Cyperaceae), a globally threatened species new for Texas. Sida 21:1201-1204.
77. OKLAHOMA BIOLOGICAL SURVEY. 2007. Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory: Rare and vulnerable plant species of Oklahoma. Norman. http://www.oknaturalheritage.ou.edu/scirpus_hal.htm#distribution. Accessed Jan 2007.
78. OSTLIE, W.R. 1990. The Nature Conservancy's element stewardship abstract for Scirpus hallii - Hall's bulrush. Arlington, Virginia.
79. OSTLIE, W.R. and S. GOTTLIEB. 1992. The Nature Conservancy's element global ranking form for Scirpus hallii.
80. PEARSON, R.G. and T.P. DAWSON. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope modes useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12:361-371.
81. PENSKAR, M.R. and P.J. HIGMAN. 2003. Hall's bulrush habitat characterization and monitoring project: 1999-2002 Report. Region 3 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Section 6 Endangered Species Grant Report No. 2003-26. Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Lansing, MI.
82. POLANS, N.O. and R.W. ALLARD. 1989. An experimental evaluation of the recovery potential of ryegrass populations from genetic stress resulting from restriction of population size. Evolution 43:1320-1323.
83. POWERS, K.D., R.E. NOBLE, and R.H. CHABRECK. 1978. Seed distribution by waterfowl in southwestern Louisiana. J. Wildlife Managem. 42:598-605.
84. RADFORD, A.E., H.E. AHLES, and C.R. BELL. 1964. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
85. RAYNAL, J. 1976. Notes Cyperologiques: 26. Le Genre Schoenoplectus II. L'amphicarpie et la sect. L'amphicarie et la sect. Supini. Adansonia, ser. 2, 16:119-155.
86. REED, P.E. JR. 1988. National list of plants that occur in wetlands: national summary. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biol. Rep. 88(24):1-244. Washington, D.C.
87. RHYMER, J.M. and D. SIMBERLOFF. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:83-109.
88. RIESEBERG, L.H. 1991. Hybridization in rare plants: insights from case studies in Cerocarpus and Helianthus. In: Genetics and conservation of rare plants. D.A. Falk and K.E. Holsinger, eds. Oxford University Press, NY. Pp. 171-181.
89. RIESEBERG, L.H. and C.R. LINDER. 1999. Hybrid classification: insights from genetic map-based studies of experimental hybrids. Ecology 80:361-370.
90. RIESEBERG, L.H., B. SINERVO, C.R. LINDER, M.C. UNGERER, and D.M. ARIAS. 1996. Role of gene interations in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272:741-745.
91. ROBERTS, E.H. 1973. Loss of seed viability: chromosomal and genetical aspects. Seed Sci. Tech. 1:515-527.
92. ROBERTSON, K.R., L.R. PHILLIPPE, and S.M. GEHLHAUSEN. 1994. The current status of Scirpus hallii A. Gray, Hall's bulrush, in Illinois. Illinois Dept. of Conservation Report, Springfield.
93. ROJAS-GARCIDUENAS, M., M.A. RUIZ, and J. CARILLO. 1962. Effect of 2,4-D and MCPA on germination and early growth. Weed Sci. 10:69-71.
94. ROLFSMEIER, S.B. 1995. Keys and distributional maps for Nebraska Cyperaceae, Part 1: Bulbostylis, Cyperus, Dulichium, Eleocharis, Eriophorum, Fimbristylis, Fuirena, Lipocarpha, and Scirpus. Trans. Nebraska Acad. Sci. 22:27-42.
95. ROLFSMEIER, S.B. and R.R. WEEDON. 2005. A survey of potential habitat for western prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara) along U.S. Highway 20 from Long Pine to Ewing, NE. High Plains Herbarium unpub. Rep., Chadron, NE.
96. ROOSA, D.M., M.J. LEOSCHKE, and L.J. EILERS. 1989. Distribution of Iowa's endangered and threatened vascular plants. Iowa Dept. of Nat. Res., Des Moines.
97. ROSENZWEIG, C., A. IGLESIAS, X.B. YANG, P.R. EPSTEIN, and E. CHIVIAN. 2000. Climate change and U.S. Agriculture: the impacts of warming and extreme weather events on productivity, plant diseases and pests. Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
98. SCHOEN, D.J. 1983. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in Gilia achilleifolia (Polemoniaceae). Evolution 37:292-301.
99. SCHUYLER, A.E. 1969. Three new species of Scirpus (Cyperaceae) in the southern United States. Notul. Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 423:1-12.
100. SEEHAUSEN, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:198-207.
101. SMALL, J.K. 1972. Manual of the southeastern flora. Hafner Publ. Co., New York.
102. SMITH, M. 2001. An assessment of the biological and ecological requirements of Schoenoplectus hallii (Hall's bulrush) population in Scott County, Missouri. Region 3 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Section 6 Endangered Species Grant. First Year Progress Report. Submitted to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
103. SMITH, M. 2002a. An assessment of the biological and ecological requirements of Schoenoplectus hallii (Hall's bulrush) population in Scott County, Missouri. Region 3 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Section 6 Endangered Species Grant Second Year Progress Report. Submitted to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
104. SMITH, M. 2003. An assessment of the biological and ecological requirements ofSchoenoplectus hallii (Hall's bulrush) population in Scott County, Missouri. Region 3 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Section 6 Endangered Species Grant. Final Report. Submitted to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
105. SMITH, M. and J.L.J. HOUPIS. 2004. Gas exchange responses of the wetland plant Schoenoplectus hallii to irradiance and vapor pressure deficit. Aquat. Bot. 79:267-275.
106. SMITH, M., S. AMMANN, N. PARKER, and P. METTLER-CHERRY. 2006. A quantitative study of styles and achenes of terminal and basal flowers of Schoenoplectus hallii, a rare plant species of transient wetland habitats. Sida 22:1159-1173.
107. SMITH, M., P. MCKENZIE, P. METTLER-CHERRY, and G. SMITH. 2004. A putative hybrid of Schoenoplectus saximontanus and S. hallii (Cyperaceae) from Oklahoma. Sida 21:475-479.
108. SMITH, S.G. 1995. New combinations in North American Schoenoplectus, Bolboshoenus, lsolepis and Trichophorum (Cyperaceae). Novon 5:97-102.
109. SMITH, S.G. 2002b. Schoenoplectus. Vol. 2. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. Oxford University Press, New York. Pp. 44-60.
110. SMITH, S.G. and G. YATSKIEVYCH. 1996. Notes on the genus Scirpus sensu lato in Missouri. Rhodora 98:168-179.
111. SMITH, S.G. and E. HAYASAKA. 2001. Delineation of Schoenoplectus sect. Malacogeton (Cyperaceae) new combination and distinction of species. J. Jap. Bot. 76:339-343.
112. SMITH, S.G. and E. HAYASAKA. 2002. New combinations within Schoenoplectus smithii and S. purshianus (sect. Actaeogoton, Cyperaceae) and comparison with eastern Asian relatives. Novon 12:106-111.
113. SORRIE, B.A. 1987. Notes on the rare flora of Massachusetts. Rhodora 89(858):139.
114. STEINAUER, R.F. 2001a. 2000 Survey for Schoenoplectus hallii (Gray) S.G. Sm. in the eastern sandhills of Nebraska. Final report to the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln.
115. STEINAUER, R.F. 2001b. 2001 Survey for Platanthera praeclara Sheviah & Bowles in Nebraska & Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis (Rydb.) Raven & Gregory, Lodgepole Creek, Kimball & Cheyenne County, Nebraska. Final report to the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln.
116. STEYERMARK, J.A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Iowa State University, Ames.
117. STRONG, M. 1994. Taxonomy of Scirpus, Trichophorum, and Schoenoplectus (Cyperaceae) in Virginia. Bartonia 58:29-68.
118. SWINK, F. and G. WILHELM. 1994. Plants of the Chicago region. 4th Ed. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis.
119. TAKAGAWA, S., I. WASHITANI, R. UESUGI, and Y. TSUMURA. 2006. Influence of inbreeding depression on a lake population of Nymphoides peltata after restoration from the soil seed bank. Conserv. Gen. 7:705-716.
120. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS. 2007. An annotated list of rare plants of Texas. Austin.
121. THOMAS, C.D., A. CAMERON, R.E. GREEN, M. BAKKENES, L.J. BEAUMONT, Y.C. COLLINGHAM, B.F.N. ERASMUS, M.F. DE SIQUEIRA, A. GRAINGER, L. HANNAH, L. HUGHES, B. HUNTLEY, A.S. VAN JAARSVOID, G.F. MIDGLEY, L. MILES, M.A. ORTEGA-HUERTA, A.T. PETERSON, O.L. PHILLIPS, and S.E. WILLIAMS. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Lett. Nature 427:145-148.
122. TUCKER, G.C. 1987. The genera of Cyperaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 68:361-445.
123. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 2007. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Prospective plantings. Washington, D.C. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Newsroom/2007/03_30_2007.asp. Accessed Apr 2007.
124. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1993. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of plant taxa for listing as endangered or threatened species. Notice of review; 50 CFR Part 17. Federal Register Vol. 58. No. 188, Sep 30, 1993. Pp. 51143-51190.
125. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1996. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; notice of final decision on identification of candidates for listing as endangered or threatened. Notice of review; 50 CFR Part 17. Federal Register Vol. 61. No. 188, Dec 5, 1996. Pp. 64481-64485.
126. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. 2007. America's National Wildlife Refuge System- refuge planning- by Region. Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/refuges/refugePlanning/. Accessed Jan 2007.
127. VENABLE, D.L. and L. LAWLOR. 1980. Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia 46:272-282.
128. VITOUSEK, P.M. 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861-1876.
129. VOSS, E.G. 1967. The status of some reports of vascular plants from Michigan. Michigan Bot. 6:13-24.
130. WATSON, L.E. 1993. Monitoring of plant candidate species in Oklahoma-year two. Unpubl. Report to U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Oklahoma Biological Survey, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman.
131. WEBER, W.A. and R.C. WITTMANN. 1992. Catalog of the Colorado flora: A biodiversity baseline. Univ. of Colorado Press, Niwot.
132. WIENHOLD, C.E. and A.G. VAN DER VALK. 1989. The impact of duration of drainage on the seed banks of northern prairie wetlands. Canad. J. Bot. 67:1878-1884.
133. WILCOVE, D.S., D. ROTHSTEIN, J. DUBOW, A. PHILLIPS, and E. LOSOS. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioSci. 48:607-615.
134. WILSON, K.L. 1981. A synopsis of the genus Scirpus (Cyperaceae) in Australia. Telopea 2:153-172.
135. WINTERRINGER, G.S. 1959. Notes on Cyperaceae from Illinois. Rhodora 61:290-292.
136. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2007. Working list: vascular plants. Madison. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/wlist/index.asp?mode=detail&Grp=20. Accessed Jan 2007.
137. WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE. 2007a. Department of Natural Resources. Statute 29.604. Endangered and threatened species protected. Madison. http://nxt.legis.state.wi.us/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=default. htm&vid=WI:Default&d=stats&jd=29.604. Accessed Apr 2007.
138. WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE. 2007b. Department of Natural Resources. Statute NR 27 (03-07). Endangered and threatened species. Madison. http://www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/code/nr/nr027.pdf. Accessed Apr 2007.
139. YATSKIEVYCH, G. 1999. Steyermark's flora of Missouri.Vol 1. Revised Ed. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
140. YATSKIEVYCH, G. and J. TURNER. 1990. Catalogue of the flora of Missouri. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 37:1-345.